My screenshots to discuss why I did what I did.
For clarification on the confusion yesterday, I wasn't getting the error so when I asked if the dough was ok it was because when I arrived mid bread 11081 the baker had ghosted, no notes from 11080, I asked anons to collect '80 while I collected '81, conitued 81, 82 and 83. On '82 or '83 (going off memory) I asked Anons to check the dough to make sure it all looked ok. I was unaware of the revisions, (I had just woke up when the '81 debacle happened) and was not getting any errors in the dough, but being the newest baker I was deferring to GYB expertise. He posted a new dough and I used it moving forward.
Here is a clear concise explanation of today and why I did what I did.
I had just arrived (woke up) and finished checking notes at >>>/qresearch/8662680 the first thing I do now that I have started baking generally is check the dough to see if I know the baker. Immediately I see the private pastebin. I call out to baker about private pastebin, but receive no respone. The board is running terrible, major lag, huge spikes in between updates. I repost my call out all in red text to notify all anons and baker again about the private pastebin >>>/qresearch/8662736 still receive no response. Anons on shouting about notables not be added and there are no notables posted that I see. Again I make a call out >>>/qresearch/8662786 and announce that if I don't hear from baker about the private pastebin I will assume bake and get things fixed. Due to the LAG I was inclined to move fast so we didn't hit the EOB without any notes collected, no baker, and no pastebin.
Post 300 (125 posts from first call) I make red text about assuming bake and ask anons to collect notes while I go back and look for the last good pastebin >>>/qresearch/8662861 Still no one responds so I start to collect notes and clone pastebin from 11091. Baker responds with >>>/qresearch/8662872 which is now not private but is under guest, as I said board is being hammered, private pastebin, no response until I step. Baker says >>>/qresearch/8662882 chill it's doc. I ask why if it is Doc is the pastebin private and why he isn't using his actual pastebin account.
I post my notes that I have collected >>>/qresearch/86622986 Doc then post his notes >>>/qresearch/8663020 keep in mind the board lag is causing this all to happen basically at the same time since I am trying to create a new bake, collect notes and verify why baker has no pastebin account but says he is doc >>>/qresearch/8663051 he responds with >>>/qresearch/8663066 I again ask him to verify it's him and not a shill claiming to be him >>>/qresearch/8663084 anons are jumping in confusing the situation even further >>>/qresearch/8663075
I respond again asking for Doc to verify >>>/qresearch/8663100 I again post collected notes @500 >>>/qresearch/8663110 Doc responds again posting another private pastebin >>>/qresearch/8663139 I respond with my reasoning >>>/qresearch/8663169 while still collecting notes and dealing with a board delay of 20+ posts per update. Due to the exteme lag I bake early >>>/qresearch/8663210 Doc responds again with another private pastebin >>>/qresearch/8663211 https://pastebin.com/pVh0zH62 I post my final notes for the bread >>>/qresearch/8663253 and then post dough for the bread I baked >>>/qresearch/8663342
In the following bread doc bakes he finally verifies that it is him and not someone else baking and I proceed to tell Anons in the bread I baked to migrate to his >>>/qresearch/866342 For clarification further, I didn't want to bake this morning, I had just woke up. No coffee, no food, irl work to do but I was making sure the board was maintained.
>you jumped the gun anon
The span of posts from initial notification was over 500 to when I baked the 2nd bread, wouldn't exactly call that jumping the gun. Doc logged into his pastebin account (would have taken 2 seconds to do and verify) only after baking new bread. I gave ample notification, I waited, and for the sanctity of the board and notables I don't think verifying who was actually baking and setting pastebins to private which would have seriously fucked everyone with the condition the board was in(lag) was to much to ask for. It amazes me, the person who stepped up to help when it appeared fuckery was afoot is the one everyone jumped on. My bakes are clean, my pastesbins are open and I never bake without my pastebin logged in so everyone can hold me accountable for my actions. That in my opinion comes with the territory of baking, if I fuck up call me, don't call me out when I am doing the right thing, and no amount of spin will convince me what I did this morning or yesterday was not the right thing.
Baking, will respond later
>why was it so important for you to know if that was Doc or an impostor?
Add what happened this morning with what happened yesterday and the fact that I have seen AFLB claim to be multiple bakers many times.
No one was accusing Doc of anything, shit happens, but this morning was 2 days in a row shit happened and I erred on the side of the board over some non existing bakers code.
o7, stepping away for a bit
Anyone here, I've tried tor and clearnet, neither will create a new bake
Yea, I baked for 7 1/2 hours yesterday and on 11154 my 7 year old was talking to me while I was baking and I didn't remember to add a title to my pre-baked setup, if that's your argument for me not baking well it's laughable.
At least I know for sure now you're one of the little bitches shilling along with Rainman, funny how he only does it to certain bakers. Funny how you went to sleep right away when I came over here and called you out.
Literally agreeing with the second biggest spammer on the board and piling on whiel I was baking and then standing behind
>implying "rainman" has zero valid points
Let's be honest, this all comes done to me not taking your little gay baking class and teaching myself. Get used to me faggot, I'm not going anywhere.
>>>/qresearch/8681236 Your post, which was used in the graphic, that Rainman and crew have been using to try and gasslight me. Why would you just randomly post my pastebin tag? And then it Randomly shows up in the graphic Rainman uses, coincidence I guess, right?
>you sperging on Doc the other day still rankles
I didn't sperg out on Doc, Doc made a mistake, I called him on it, he didn't respond, I called him on it again more vocally, he didn't respond, I called it a third time and said if I don't receive a response I'll grab the bake. After I grabbed the bake, you told me to hold off thinking you are somehow kingshit of baking. Once Doc verified and fixed the private pastebin I stood down.
>don't fly while baking
My style is perfectly fine, if I want to banter with the retards that attack (which I do for a specific reason, pic related) that's none of your concern, except for the fact that you've now exposed exactly what I thought, you're part of the Rainman crew attacking bakers not in your little gay club.
>why do you bake anyway?
Because I was tired of watching bakers leave out important info constantly, why are you trying to dissuade good bakers from baking? Oh because you want to control the control the flow of information, wonder why?
You exposed yourself with the OSS1 post that you then screenshotted and used to gaslight a fellow baker.
>please answer why it's such a big deal to you
>
>do you not want anons to know who bakes?
It's a big deal because you've only done it to me, I post my symbol when I bake and the only time you've done it it was used in a rainman graphic.
You glow nigga.
Still waiting for an answer of why the guy that teaches the baking class is working with Rainman to gaslight fellow bakers. Seems like a fair question
I'm not fighting with anyone, just want an answer as to why Rusty is working with Rainman to gas light and attack fellow baker
-
Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can't do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how 'sensitive they are to criticism.'
>98e720
-
Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary 'attack the messenger' ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as 'kooks', 'right-wing', 'liberal', 'left-wing', 'terrorists', 'conspiracy buffs', 'radicals', 'militia', 'racists', 'religious fanatics', 'sexual deviates', and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.
-
Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can't do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how 'sensitive they are to criticism.'