Truth Seeker ID: 5131e4 Dec. 28, 2021, 4:44 p.m. No.8231   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8233 >>8374 >>8388

Does P really equal PRUSSIA? More than one of Q's CUEs leads us to this. For instance, it was the Prussian nobility who financed the Nazi party's rise to power.

The Prussian Origins of Modern Education

 

https://prussiagate.substack.com/p/the-prussian-origins-of-modern-education

 

There were 6 key outcomes for the Prussian education system:

‣ Obedient soldiers to the army,

‣ Obedient workers for mines, factories, and farms,

‣ Well-subordinated civil servants, trained in their function,

‣Well-subordinated clerks for industry,

‣ Citizens who thought alike on most issues,

‣ National uniformity in thought, word, and deed.

 

Many believe Lenin and Trotsky’s Bolshevik revolution was the result of a grass roots movement, but that is completely false. Instead, in order to get the revolution off the ground, Lenin needed money; and lots of it. He found that money from Kaiser Wilhelm II, the Kaiser of Germany and King of Prussia.

 

As we shall also discover in another dig, Karl Marx was most likely a Prussian agent operating for and on behalf of the King of Prussia and to use Marxism as a means to destabilize nations ripe for the raping of its resources.

 

https://postflaviana.org/wolfgang-waldner-marx/

 

Dig deeply because Prussia is a key to many things. And going back to the time of the Crusades, there is a link to the Prut River separating Moldova and Romania as the origin of the Pruteni who became Prussia and some of whom later dominated Britain. In other words, Prussian origins are found in the Phoenician/Komnenes Byzantine empire.

Truth Seeker ID: 5131e4 Dec. 28, 2021, 4:46 p.m. No.8233   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8247

>>8231

The Underground History of American Education: An Intimate Investigation Into the Prison of Modern Schooling

 

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1099085.The_Underground_History_of_American_Education

 

"The World's Most Courageous Teacher" reveals the inner circle secrets of the American school system. The legendary schoolteacher, John Taylor Gatto, invested over 10 years of dedicated research to uncover some of the most alarming ideas and writings by the creators and advocates of mandatory attendance schooling, which show where the system came from and why it was created. He combined these facts with his personal experience as a teacher for 30 years in New York public schools, where he won many awards, including being named State Teacher of the Year twice, and has authored an all-time classic.

 

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2010/09/john-taylor-gatto/the-prussian-connection/#ref

 

The Long Reach Of The Teutonic Knights

In 1876, before setting off from America to Germany to study, William H. Welch, an ambitious young Bostonian, told his sister: “If by absorbing German lore I can get a little start of a few thousand rivals and thereby reduce my competition to a few hundred more or less it is a good point to tally.” Welch did go off to Germany for the coveted Ph.D., a degree which at the time had its actual existence in any practical sense only there, and in due course his ambition was satisfied. Welch became first dean of Johns Hopkins Medical School and, later, chief advisor to the Rockefeller Foundation on medical projects. Welch was one of thousands who found the German Ph.D. a blessing without parallel in late-nineteenth-century America. German Ph.D.’s ruled the academic scene by then.

 

For an ironic reflection on the success of Prussian educational ideals, take a look at Martin Van Creveld’s Fighting Power (Greenwood Press, 1982). Creveld, the world’s finest military historian, undertakes to explain why German armies in 1914—1918 and 1939—1945, although heavily outnumbered in the major battles of both wars, consistently inflicted 30 percent more casualties than they suffered, whether they were winning or losing, on defense or on offense, no matter who they fought. They were better led, we might suspect, but the actual training of those field commanders comes as a shock. While American officer selection was right out of Frederick Taylor, complete with psychological dossiers and standardized tests, German officer training emphasized individual apprenticeships, week-long field evaluations, extended discursive written evaluations by senior officers who personally knew the candidates. The surprise is, while German state management was rigid and regulated with its common citizens, it was liberal and adventuresome with its elites. After WWII, and particularly after Vietnam, American elite military practice began to follow this German model. Ironically enough, America’s elite private boarding schools like Groton had followed the Prussian lead from their inception as well as the British models of Eton and Harrow.

 

German elite war doctrine cut straight to the heart of the difference between the truly educated and the merely schooled. For the German High Command war was seen as an art, a creative activity, grounded in science. War made the highest demands on an officer’s entire personality and the role of the individual in Germany was decisive. American emphasis, on the other hand, was doctrinal, fixated on cookbook rules. The U.S. officer’s manual said: “Doctrines of combat operation are neither numerous nor complex. Knowledge of these doctrines provides a firm basis for action in a particular situation.” This reliance on automatic procedure rather than on creative individual decisions got a lot of Americans killed by the book. The irony, of course, was that American, British, and French officers got the same lockstep conditioning in dependence that German foot soldiers did. There are some obvious lessons here which can be applied directly to public schooling.