Hive-Mind General #40: The 'SKYKING Rises Again' Edition

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here.

"We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."

VINCIT OMNIA VERITAS | SEMPER FIDELIS | WWG1WGA | HIVEMIND

Q's Private Board

>>>/projectdcomms/ & Q's Trip-code: Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6

100+ Q Proof Graphics

QProofs.com ————————————–——– Website dedicated to Q Proofs

Find Q drops here

>>88

https://qposts.online/

Ultimate Tripcode Summary

>>24283

Q's Latest Posts

Tuesday 06.28.2022

>>>/qresearch/16551514 –––––––––––––––––– SEC TEST

>>>/qresearch/16551531 –––––––––––––––––– Failed to load sec encryption

>>>/qresearch/16551546 –––––––––––––––––– Are you ready to finish what we started?

>>>/qresearch/16551558 –––––––––––––––––– BOOMS EN_ROUTE TOMORROW.

>>>/qresearch/16551590 –––––––––––––––––– Site under attack.

>>>/qresearch/16551632 –––––––––––––––––– West Virginia v EPA - The END

>>>/qresearch/16551639 –––––––––––––––––– rt >>>/qresearch/16551602

>>>/qresearch/16551674 –––––––––––––––––– Think (...) dEPArtures.

>>>/qresearch/16551708 –––––––––––––––––– rt >>>/qresearch/16551674 Think what you now KNOW. [0] Delta (CAP: >>22374)

Wednesday 06.29.2022

>>>/qresearch/16551765 –––––––––––––––––– "A ruling in favor of West Virginia would reverse a decades-long trend (...)" (CAP: >>23599)

>>>/qresearch/16551922 –––––––––––––––––– TRIP compromised

>>>/qresearch/16551927 –––––––––––––––––– rt >>>/qresearch/16551922 Remember 5/4

>>>/qresearch/16551945 –––––––––––––––––– rt >>>/qresearch/16551943 What makes a good movie?

>>>/qresearch/16551956 –––––––––––––––––– rt >>>/qresearch/16551930 Future Proves Past

>>>/qresearch/16552035 –––––––––––––––––– 23:54:46 - LB

>>>/qresearch/16552143 –––––––––––––––––– rt >>>/qresearch/16552109, >>>/qresearch/16552069, >>>/qresearch/16552098 Confirmed.

>>22376 rt >>22373, >>22374 ———————- This TRIP will never be used again. (CAP: >>23607)

Tuesday 12.08.2020

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/11709084.html#11953143 ————————————–——– We're Not Gonna Take It (CAP: >>11953295)

>>2518,NOTABLES BREAD #1

Evidence Of Treason

The Plot Against The President

https://patpmovie.com/

2000 Mules

https://www.2000mules.com/

NOTABLES ARE NOT ENDORSEMENTS

>>25292 Updated SKYKING Day proof

>>25297, >>25298, >>25323 US Naval Institute COMMS

>>25325, >>25340 National Guard Retweeted

>>25331 GRASSLEY Corn COMMS

>>25349 Russia orders Jewish Agency to stop all operations in country

>>25351, >>25387, >>25704, >>25714, >>25869 UK Resignations (now 36 and counting)

>>25358, >>25359, >>25491, >>25458, >>25438, >>25439, >>25465, >>25495, >>25705, >>25706 More digs on Cicadafags

>>25365, >>25405, >>25371, >>25494, >>25698, >>25700, >>25796 Baron of A/ cicada fags meme farming /hm/ breads

>>25390, >>25417 Police say that the Highland Park shooter was wearing women's clothing at the time of the attack.

>>25395 JEAN-PIERRE: "I am not going to talk about alleged materials from the laptop."

>>25400 Highland Park parade shooting suspect Robert Crimo was kicked out of synagogue

>>25403, >>25404 Question: how many other operations took place in a "highland" context?

>>25411 No evidence the shooter is a Trump supporter.

>>25437 Notable Jim dismisses FJ's concerns (8kun history lesson)

>>25462, >>25464, >>25470, >>25466, >>25471, >>25475 Pepe patch?

>>25468, >>25473 Cats in the Navy: Book Explores the Secret Life of Sea Cats

>>25485, >>25488, >>25489, >>25633, >>25614, >>25492, >>25625, >>25642, >>25648, >>25686, >>25771 US Naval Institute: Incomming Cyber Attack Predicted?

>>25498 Highland shooter painting on home wall

>>25536, >>25592, >>25550, >>25551, >>25552 DJT ReTruthing acct's discussing Rachel Chandler?!?!?!

>>25559, >>25562, >>25564, >>25565, >>25573, >>25575, >>25580, >>25584, >>25588, >>25594, >>25601, >>25602, >>25617, >>25620, >>25630 What the fuck just happened on QR? (Jim attacks himself) (misappropriated (You)'s cookie fuckery)

>>25599 Babyfist is retarded

>>25582, >>25607,>>25612 17 mminute Delta (last post on /hm/ before board placed in read-only mode)

>>25623, >>25641, >>25647 Freddy dunks on Jim

>>25652, >>25657, >>25660, >>25663, >>25664, Jim tries to explain, fails bigly with self own (wordpress/ IsItWetYet)

>>25670, >>25673 Why the fuck did Devin Nunes ReTruth Video of man getting bug in mouth (cicada in mouth?)

>>25694, >>25702 The bots are back on QR. (Jim "attack" resumes for AM shift)

>>25729 Joe Biden inadvertently helped Hunter pay Russia-linked escorts: report

>>25732 Heinz bottle - comms to Kerry?

>>25735, >>25737, >>25738, >>25841 Trump 757 circa 2016: coming back to the skies in the Fall of 2022, or maybe sooner. Get ready!

>>25752, >>25777 Jim on Project Odin: Odin is still waiting for that zero delta

>>25756, >>25757 This article talks about an AI chatbot that was released on /pol/

>>25762, >>25819, >>25836, >>25823, >>25827, >>25829, >>25833, >>25832, >>25837 SKYKING: Infamous plane heist at Sea-Tac caught on camera (Why NOW?!?)

>>25783, >>25804, >>25835, >>25915 Freddy appears (AMA maybe later? Thread Created)

>>25856, >>25860, >>25861, >>25871 Use Ghidara to analyze 8kun source code?

>>25877, >>25884, >>25889, >>25893, >>25896, >>25898, >>25901, >>25902, >>25904, >>25922 8kun Server Time is fucky

>>25891, >>25895, >>26008 Georgia Guidstones Shoah'd (win)

>>25923 US Navy: The more eyes on this the better. It seems like they are giving us very obvious comms.

>>25925, >>25927, >>25932, >>25933, >>25940, >>25946, >>26002 Even MSM is dunkin on Jim

>>25974, >>25989, >>26003 Trump doesnt endorese Ron Watkins for Arizona Senate (Sad.)

>>25982 US Naval Institute: Blood Moon COMMS?

>>26016 #39

Previous Hivemind Notables

>>25472 #38

>>24509 #37, >>23771 #36/1, >>23772 #36/2

>>23052 #35, >>22318 #34, >>21505 #33

>>20426 #32/1, >>20427 #32/2, >>20429 #32/3

>>20818 #32/4, >>19941 #31/1, >>19943 #31/2

>>18627 #30/1, >>18628 #30/2, >>18629 #30/3

>>18950 #30/4, >>18989 #30/5, >>18990 #30/6

>>18204 #29/1, >>18205 #29/2, >>18206 #29/3

>>17468 #28/1, >>17470 #28/2, >>17472 #28/3

Thuper Noteth of The B Gayness

>>23674

>>23076 Barron arizona and babyfist reply to 8bit on TS

>>23194 Video of jim and babyfist explaining B dcomms incident >>23204 Transcripted

>>23209, >>23212, >>23213, >>23215 Babyfist "Trial Run"

>>23220 Stupidity in action

>>23234 Babyfist talking about working with sgt b, running psops

>>23427, >>23429 Jim-crew talk about torturing Fred Brennan >>23431, >>23435

>>23441 Baron Arizona and Babyfist acting like B is real and should be listened to.

>>23444, >>23445 Barron Arizona op_basltoff activated

>>23449 Could Broderick be B? >>23452, >>23453, >>23454, >>23455, >>23456

>>23478 BV Called out babyfist VPS back then

>>23480 Babyfist on gab, wont tell who sgt b is

>>23513 B Admitting they used LaughingMan/Babyfists account to post on dcomms

>>23527 babyfist discusses the lies being told by qresearch

>>23544 babyfist saying that sgt b ruined his name it better be worth it

>>23550 babyfist talks about division

>>23564, >>23567 deepdigs claims babyfist chaos made up by oss even though admitted in video

>>23462, >>23463, >>23466 MR Red/Orlando

>>23476, >>23505, >>23523 Tony, Ron(cm) and James

>>23548 babyfist admins he is fren of Thomas Schoenberger

>>23547 he will try to blow it off

>>24699, >>24752 CivAnon >>>/abcu/64

>>24752 Civanon Sgt. b posts aggregated by qrb

>>25037, >>25038 Covfefe/QPatriot Digs

Dough

https://controlc.com/8022a3a6

Baker Seeking Handoff

>>26024

>Dough

spacing error in notables fix'd

https://controlc.com/7ac3c4f0

>>26076

>Confirm handoff

Handoff Confirmed

thanks 'bees

godspeed

o7

>>26064

>Thursday's Sun: You'll have to dip your hands in blood to get rid of me

US Naval Institute Blood Moon COMMS...?

>>25982 (pb) US Naval Institute: Blood Moon COMMS?

>>26100

HAS ANYONE ELSE NOTICED THE TIMESTAMP?

blast goes off at 00:00:33 on the fucking DOT

>>26129

thos niggers still kvetching over there?

seems fairly comfy in here

>>26146

...nice...

>>26165

whoa

very interesting

godamnit

after being pretty merciless in my trolling of TS

I am rather enjoying it >.<

>>26182

I was more meaning to just reference the seconds

but yeah

04:03:33

333

tips of tres, kek

4 am is a huge fail

should have been 3:33:33

but I digress

>>26331

>Q used TOR tonight, which means we can't track by ID.

agreed

>We have to track by tripcode.

okay

so

discussion

are the ONE TIME USE tripcodes going to "book-end"

sing-out with a brand new trip

Q just did this

sign-in with the OLD tripPLUSZERO Delta

OLD trip +ZERO Delta "grants" permission( trust?) to generate a NEW Trip

This NEW trip

that is generated after SIGNING IN with that last OLD trip +confirming IDEN with 0 delta

is now that days sign-off trip

so they are one time use /

but they roll over, or book-end

sign in with the last trip +0 delta

sign out with a brand new trip

>>26331

>I am guessing Q will come in, make one post with previous tripcode, confirm tripcode change is happening. Then get a zero delta with the next tripcode

I am thinking EXACTLY THIS

-except-

I think Q confirms sign-in with the last tripcode used, and zero delta confirms using the last tripcode used

once zero-delta proof in built and confirmed by tagging the post with the OLD tripcode

a NEW tripcode gets generated

>>26348

>I think Q confirms sign-in with the last tripcode used, and zero delta confirms using the last tripcode used

>once zero-delta proof in built and confirmed by tagging the post with the OLD tripcode

>a NEW tripcode gets generated

^^^ that JUST happened

>>26341

>1958 Domaine de la Romanee-Conti La Tache Grand Cru Monopole

classy

>>26345

>another Shadilay please, this time no ice

its one of those nights

kek

>>26350

>I will have rum. Neet, double. Arrr.

commin up!

>>26350

>I will have rum. Neet, double. Arrr.

enjoi matey!

>>26352

>if Q came back with that trip tomorrow and no ZD, I ignore it.

100000000000000000000% agree

ifANYtripcode "returns"

I absolutely ignore until it 0 deltas with POTUS ONLY

>>26369

>q's posts have all been clearnet. these, are not

do you want to strip the rest of the TOR posts out of the headpost?

everything last week on /qr/ was TOR

the only clearnet post was the trip post here on /hm/

>>26389

>everything last week on /qr/ was TOR

of course

the 0 delta post that confirmed the whole shebang was a TOR post on /qr/

>>26252

>Confirmed

this is the post that confirms the ZERO DELTA proofs

Q always tagged a "correct" zero delta proof before

this is that post

so

ergo

in my opinion it goes in

>>26392

>none of the drops from 6.28 or 6.29 over there or in here were torposts.

YES THEY ARE

they are ALL TOR posts

click the links and go to the breads

yes they are

>>26381

yeah

I cant answer that one

if Q isnt using trip over on /qr/

why the fuck is there a namefield text "trip"

I get what you are pointing at here

that could just be some anon pointing out the delta

while larping as Q for keks cause everyone was doing it

>>26399

>give me fucking paste

5:5

RELEVENT LINKS FOR SORTING FROM /QR/

UID: 75a063

>>>/qresearch/16653451 same UID as 0 delta poster...

>NEW Q

>>>/qresearch/16653483 0 delta

>This is not a game

>>>/qresearch/16653509 what the fuck is this

>Actually, it was EtheFriend that wrote that post.

UID: 000000

>>>/qresearch/16653653 tripcode in namefield

>>>/qresearch/16653707 tripcode in namefield

>>>/qresearch/16653803 tripcode in namefield

>>>/qresearch/16653931 no Q signiture

>>26409

okay

I already have a problem with this

UID: 75a063

3 posts in bread

is the 0 delta poster

so like

what about those other two posts tho

>>26410

>How does this post relate?

it doesnt and should probably be sorted out

its one of the 4 TOR posts that bread

just putting them all in for eyes

>>26419

>i think they figured out how to game it.

it smells fishy

work it back

this whole fucking proof revolves around poster UID:75a063being the zero delta poster ergo, being Q

that poster has 3 posts in the bread

yeah, the all caps redtext self promo is damning

but so is this shit:

>>>/qresearch/16653509 what the fuck is this

>Actually, it was EtheFriend that wrote that post.

does that sound like Q to anyone here?

here is the full reply chain for that supposed "Q zero delta" poster; 75a063

>>>/qresearch/16653387 OP of reply chain

>>>/qresearch/16653479

>please stop trying to sound like Q, can you people just write ur theories in plain english.

>>>/qresearch/16653495

>>>/qresearch/16653498

>Hivemind?

>OSS?

>LOW IQ?

>>>/qresearch/16653509

>75a063

>Actually, it was EtheFriend that wrote that post.

>>26422

> I don't see how someone could game getting a zero delta

there are like 10 anons in that bread that are on the right minute stamp to 0 delta

there are 2 other anons in that minute stamps that are ALSObeforePOTUS

so thats 3 options right there

last time

the /hm/ tripcoded Q posted screenshots of their (You)'s over on /qr/

(specifically the post that went zero delta)

that is what sealed the deal on IDEN tracking

this75a063poster doesnt really pass the sniff test imo

>>26427

>so thats 3 options right there

>>26429

>If the above is true, then they lied tonight.

I really have to agree with this

never really seems to mean NEVER

>>26429

>I won't bake it with the bullshit from today in

it ALL revolves around thatUID: 75a063being the 0 delta post

and I cant reconcile the other two posts that came from that ID

>>26438

>Who's they?

the /hm/ Q from last week that said that tripcode would NEVER be used again

!!PEY.v0n7rU

that is suppsoed to be a dead canary

one-time-use

never to be used again

not trying to burst any bubbles

or convince anyone of anything

just walking the path as I see it

can anyone reconcile the other posts from75a063???

what the arg?

either we have to expain the content of those posts as having come from Q

or

we have to explain why that anon had the same ip hash as Q in that bread

neither seem legitimately explainable to me

but I dont know everything

>>26447

>Explain what?

This TRIP will never be used again.

>>22376 /pb Q

^^^ THAT trip

!!PEY.v0n7rU

its not supposed to be used ever again...???

so like

the fact that it was used tonight

seems to violate the definition of "never"

>>26450

>This TRIP will never be used again.

now I am open to explainations

I am the anon that proposed the possible book-ending of the one-time-use tripcode

that seems explainable to me

the zero delta poster having the same IP hash as some rando anon in the /qr/ bread is not as easy for me to reconcile

like

at all

>>26451

>the zero delta

yeah

thats whay I need help reconciling now that I have checked all the posts fromUID: 75a063

UID: 75a063

>>>/qresearch/16653451 same UID as 0 delta poster...

>NEW Q

>>>/qresearch/16653483 0 delta

>This is not a game

>>>/qresearch/16653509 what the fuck is this

>Actually, it was EtheFriend that wrote that post.

all 3 of those are Q?

>>26455

>Q has been known to post as a regular anon from the same IP, former BVs have screenshots.

you make a good point anon

this is actually a true data point

>>26455

>Q has been known to post as a regular anon from the same IP, former BVs have screenshots.

okay

I'll bite on that

theNEW Qcould be Q as anon pointing the retards to the 0 delta

possible

how about the other post

I am on the fence

check the full reply chain

>>26426

and

ffs

Q comes in hot to let eveyone know it was EtherFriend that wrote some post...???

really?

thats Q posting as anon?

>>26462

>Show me how that happens.

Jims faggot crew got themselves a 0 delta with Q last week

but it took over 50 posts in the bread to do it

so everyone thought it was gamed

this "anon" only has 3 posts

but

there are 2 other anons that are potential 0 delta candidates for that exact minute stamp

check it out

obviously only one of them signed the post Q

but, still

>>26465

>0 delta with Q last week

0 delta with POTUS truth

again

it took 50 posts from that UID in the bread to do it

>>26467

>I saw a Q same-ip post of Q calling a twitter influencer a fat whore or something along those lines.

.......

and now I am being swayed

I mean

I can still see it being possible

the poster that I am 'fency' on

they still only have 3 posts in that bread

so thats a remarkably small post count number to magically go 0 delta with POTUS

on top of that

theONEof their posts that did end up being the 0 delta

is theONEof their posts that they signed with a Q

that would be a remarkable coincidence

there is no way Jcrew could plan on being able to do that at will

I will give you that

>>26470

>they use it again on 7.6?

yeah

honestly

I would have preffered to get the TAG on the delta proofs from aBRAND NEWtripcode

I have already posted by "book-end" theory that potentially explains it

but I agree you bring up a good criticism

and I dont have concrete refutation for that criticism

>>26461

>the ZD while also claiming to be Q.

the ZD while signing as Q

with only 3 posts in bread

I am sperging on the other 2 posts

but perhaps unreasonably

there is no way in hell you could plan on doing that at will by gaming

they tried

it took 50 posts

3 posts in bread

only the Q signed post went zero delta

mathematically....

>>26470

>The 3 post uid with the zero delta has a higher probability of being q than the torposter in here.

I can understand that reasoning

still gaming out all the possible logic in my head

>>26475

>At this point it throws ALL tripcodes into a completely unconfirmable status.

which is why I appreciated the LAST /hm/ tripcode Q posting the screenshots with the (You)'s on the zero delta post

and for the record I do think being HYPER CRITICAL is the right move here

I appreciate everyone keeping it tactful and on point

UID: 75a063

>>>/qresearch/16653451

>>>/qresearch/16653483 0 delta

>>>/qresearch/16653509

0 delta with signiture, low post count in bread, posting behavior matches "past Q"

I can buy it

UID: 000000

>>>/qresearch/16653653 tripcode in namefield

>>>/qresearch/16653707 tripcode in namefield

>>>/qresearch/16653803 tripcode in namefield

IDEAS?

>>26490

>Why are you addin the non-signed posts. Q specifically said not to do that.

I was unaware of that

I would like to have the drop for reference

but I'll take your word on it

it sounds right to me

>>26491

>Then dart banned the TORposter.

yea

we are already missing some posts

there are at least 2 posts deleted that were referenced by the anons in that bread attempting to track the 0 delta

we dont know what those posts were or what UID they were posted under

although

the board log doesnt show any individual deletes

the board log shows a SINGLE entry of "deleted all posts by IP address in bread"

ergo

our 3 post 0 delta anon should not have lost any posts

right/??

>>26502

thank you anon

>Q specifically said to not list posts they make without being signed as Q

so

if theyARE SIGNED AS Q

they should be listed

>>26501

>technically none of the untripped ones should be up there at all.

I disagree on the principle that tripcodes are not necessary based on the principle that the first drops have no trip

but agree that tripcode does NOT = verification

and

the connection between the /qr/ 0 delta poster tonight and the /hm/ tripcoded posts is not as strong as it was last week

but

to be honest I havent even gotten that far yet

I got spooked by the unsigned posts from the zero delta poster and went right back to the beginning again

I havent deeply analyzed the tripcoded posts here yet really, kek

>>26488

>One of the posts from the UID was pointing at a TOR post calling it new Q.

AHHA

thank YOU anon

I was trying to connect the green links in that bread with our posts screencaps here to figure that out

okay

thats what was being pointed too with theNEW Qpost

>>26509

>This was the only one I saw.

this one

>>26512

5:5 'bees

>>26514

dart deleted all posts in the bread by ONE IP

so, an entire tranche of posts from one UID got nuked

>>26518

>Which would explain the jump to clearnet.

boom

indeed anon

good point

I'm gonna be here a little while longer pondering

going to attempt to stitch together a coherent timeline

just going to go chronologically point by point

First thing that happened

this post shows up

its a TOR post

its signed by Q

it has the old trip in the namefield

you can see as of the time of the screencap, there were five TOR posts in that bread

(not my CAP, its posted in the bread)

the BANS log shows that it is THE post that got the banhammer

Dart did BAN +delete all by that IP in bread

so, when Dart did that;

it nuked every other TOR post in that bread up to that moment

it was a 1 minute BAN

so it only nuked TOR posting for 60 seconds

and I havent even gotten to the 0 delta yet

kek

>>26523

>>>/qresearch/16653755 anon

this anon is attempting to track chronology of events

>>>/qresearch/16653443 It has begun. - Deleted

>>>/qresearch/16653483 OPERATORS are ACTIVE - Zero Delta

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/108603818430722219

>>>/qresearch/16653628 Confirmed - also Deleted

>>>/qresearch/16653707 POST DELETED

>>26524

I am referecing this anons post to point out how they labelled a now deleted post that we do NOT have a screen shot of

post: >>>/qresearch/16653628

it is labelled in series with the Q/ zero delta posts

and it has the label

CONFIRMED

I am going to go way out on a strong limb

and assume that as a Q signed TOR post that was confirming anons poiting out the zero delta

>>26523

>it nuked every other TOR post in that bread up to that moment

this is every single TOR post I can find evidence for having been nuked in that bread

I.E. an anon linked to the post

and now its green

>you can see as of the time of the screencap, there were five TOR posts in that bread

so there should be AT LEAST five

>>>/qresearch/16653417 (deleted TOR post - unkown content)

>>>/qresearch/16653442 It has begun. (deleted TOR post)

>>>/qresearch/16653451 (deleted TOR post - unkown content)

>>>/qresearch/16653469 (deleted TOR post - unkown content)

>>>/qresearch/16653483 This is not a game OPERATORS are ACTIVE. (clearnet 0 delta)

>>>/qresearch/16653628 Confirmed. (deleted TOR post)

>>26527

kek

a few of those links were green because of impropert formatting apparently

fixing

>>26527

>this is every single TOR post I can find evidence for having been nuked in that bread

revised

>>>/qresearch/16653417 (deleted TOR post - unkown content)

>>>/qresearch/16653442 It has begun. (deleted TOR post)

>>>/qresearch/16653483 This is not a game OPERATORS are ACTIVE. (clearnet 0 delta)

>>>/qresearch/16653628 Confirmed. (deleted TOR post)

>>26523

okay

Ban/Delete timing/ chronology

Dart deleted/banned the TOR posts @23:17:56 EST

(thank you ban logs)

>>26525

>assume that was a Q signed TOR post that was confirming anons poiting out the zero delta

confirmed

>>>/qresearch/16653628 Confirmed - also Deleted

CAP related

>>26532

>They've proven they can fake trips. Why would faking IDs be different?

kek

keep reading anon

I actually think those other posts were Q posting unsigned as anon

obviously use your own discernment

but thats where I am at

Deleted TOR post CAP

>>>/qresearch/16653628

>>>/qresearch/16653628

>>>/qresearch/16653628

Deleted TOR post CAP

>>>/qresearch/16653442

>>>/qresearch/16653442

>>>/qresearch/16653442

Surviving TOR post CAP

>>>/qresearch/16653653

>>>/qresearch/16653653

>>>/qresearch/16653653

Surviving TOR post CAP

>>>/qresearch/16653803

>>>/qresearch/16653803

>>>/qresearch/16653803

reply to: >>>/qresearch/16653795

qresearch bread #21035

>>>/qresearch/16653442 –––––––––––––––––– It has begun. (CAP: >>26535)

>>>/qresearch/16653483 –––––––––––––––––– Operators ACTIVE [0]Delta (CAPS: >>26207, >>26184)

>>>/qresearch/16653628 –––––––––––––––––– Confirmed. (CAP: >>26534)

>>>/qresearch/16653653 –––––––––––––––––– Confirmed. This board is compromised. (CAP: >>26536)

>>>/qresearch/16653707 –––––––––––––––––– Post deleted Zero Delta Confirmed x2 (CAP: >>26209)

>>>/qresearch/16653803 –––––––––––––––––– rt >>>/qresearch/16653795 o7 (CAP: >>26537)

this is what I got from /qr/

https://controlc.com/c1c33226

Q's Latest Posts

Wednesday 07.06.2022

>>>/qresearch/16653442 –––––––––––––––––– It has begun. (CAP: >>26535)

>>>/qresearch/16653483 –––––––––––––––––– Operators ACTIVE [0]Delta (CAPS: >>26207, >>26184)

>>>/qresearch/16653628 –––––––––––––––––– Confirmed. (CAP: >>26534)

>>>/qresearch/16653653 –––––––––––––––––– Confirmed. This board is compromised. (CAP: >>26536)

>>>/qresearch/16653707 –––––––––––––––––– Post deleted Zero Delta Confirmed x2 (CAP: >>26209)

>>>/qresearch/16653803 –––––––––––––––––– rt >>>/qresearch/16653795 o7 (CAP: >>26537)

>>>/hivemind/26252 –––––––––––––––––––––– rt >>26227, >>26222, >>26234, >>26250, >>26251 Confirmed

>>>/hivemind/26255 –––––––––––––––––––––– No Further Posts on QR Ever.

>>>/hivemind/26279 –––––––––––––––––––––– All future COMMS will be verified With POTUS & ONLY POTUS.

Wednesday 06.29.2022

>>>/qresearch/16551765 –––––––––––––––––– "A ruling in favor of West Virginia would reverse a decades-long trend (...)" (CAP: >>23599)

>>>/qresearch/16551922 –––––––––––––––––– TRIP compromised

>>>/qresearch/16551927 –––––––––––––––––– rt >>>/qresearch/16551922 Remember 5/4

>>>/qresearch/16551945 –––––––––––––––––– rt >>>/qresearch/16551943 What makes a good movie?

>>>/qresearch/16551956 –––––––––––––––––– rt >>>/qresearch/16551930 Future Proves Past

>>>/qresearch/16552035 –––––––––––––––––– 23:54:46 - LB

>>>/qresearch/16552143 –––––––––––––––––– rt >>>/qresearch/16552109, >>>/qresearch/16552069, >>>/qresearch/16552098 Confirmed.

>>>/hivemind/22376 –––––––––––––––––––––– rt >>22373, >>22374 This TRIP will never be used again.

Tuesday 06.28.2022

>>>/qresearch/16551514 –––––––––––––––––– SEC TEST

>>>/qresearch/16551531 –––––––––––––––––– Failed to load sec encryption

>>>/qresearch/16551546 –––––––––––––––––– Are you ready to finish what we started?

>>>/qresearch/16551558 –––––––––––––––––– BOOMS EN_ROUTE TOMORROW.

>>>/qresearch/16551590 –––––––––––––––––– Site under attack.

>>>/qresearch/16551632 –––––––––––––––––– West Virginia v EPA - The END

>>>/qresearch/16551639 –––––––––––––––––– rt >>>/qresearch/16551602

>>>/qresearch/16551674 –––––––––––––––––– Think (...) dEPArtures.

>>>/qresearch/16551708 –––––––––––––––––– rt >>>/qresearch/16551674 Think what you now KNOW. [0] Delta (CAP: >>22374)

Tuesday 12.08.2020

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/11709084.html#11953143 ————————————–——– We're Not Gonna Take It (CAP: >>11953295)

and now I take rest

think for yourself out there folks

o7

>>26549

astute

>>26565

THIS IS THE WAY

exactly this

have learned the same through trial and error

shadilay anon

>>26583

kek

headposts are not endorsements?

https://controlc.com/c1c33226

Q's Latest Posts

Wednesday 07.06.2022

>>>/qresearch/16653442 –––––––––––––––––– It has begun. (CAP: >>26535)

>>>/qresearch/16653483 –––––––––––––––––– Operators ACTIVE [0]Delta (CAPS: >>26207, >>26184)

>>>/qresearch/16653628 –––––––––––––––––– Confirmed. (CAP: >>26534)

>>>/qresearch/16653653 –––––––––––––––––– Confirmed. This board is compromised. (CAP: >>26536)

>>>/qresearch/16653707 –––––––––––––––––– Post deleted Zero Delta Confirmed x2 (CAP: >>26209)

>>>/qresearch/16653803 –––––––––––––––––– rt >>>/qresearch/16653795 o7 (CAP: >>26537)

>>>/hivemind/26252 –––––––––––––––––––––– rt >>26227, >>26222, >>26234, >>26250, >>26251 Confirmed

>>>/hivemind/26255 –––––––––––––––––––––– No Further Posts on QR Ever.

>>>/hivemind/26279 –––––––––––––––––––––– All future COMMS will be verified With POTUS & ONLY POTUS.

Wednesday 06.29.2022

>>>/qresearch/16551765 –––––––––––––––––– "A ruling in favor of West Virginia would reverse a decades-long trend (...)" (CAP: >>23599)

>>>/qresearch/16551922 –––––––––––––––––– TRIP compromised

>>>/qresearch/16551927 –––––––––––––––––– rt >>>/qresearch/16551922 Remember 5/4

>>>/qresearch/16551945 –––––––––––––––––– rt >>>/qresearch/16551943 What makes a good movie?

>>>/qresearch/16551956 –––––––––––––––––– rt >>>/qresearch/16551930 Future Proves Past

>>>/qresearch/16552035 –––––––––––––––––– 23:54:46 - LB

>>>/qresearch/16552143 –––––––––––––––––– rt >>>/qresearch/16552109, >>>/qresearch/16552069, >>>/qresearch/16552098 Confirmed.

>>>/hivemind/22376 –––––––––––––––––––––– rt >>22373, >>22374 This TRIP will never be used again.

Tuesday 06.28.2022

>>>/qresearch/16551514 –––––––––––––––––– SEC TEST

>>>/qresearch/16551531 –––––––––––––––––– Failed to load sec encryption

>>>/qresearch/16551546 –––––––––––––––––– Are you ready to finish what we started?

>>>/qresearch/16551558 –––––––––––––––––– BOOMS EN_ROUTE TOMORROW.

>>>/qresearch/16551590 –––––––––––––––––– Site under attack.

>>>/qresearch/16551632 –––––––––––––––––– West Virginia v EPA - The END

>>>/qresearch/16551639 –––––––––––––––––– rt >>>/qresearch/16551602

>>>/qresearch/16551674 –––––––––––––––––– Think (...) dEPArtures.

>>>/qresearch/16551708 –––––––––––––––––– rt >>>/qresearch/16551674 Think what you now KNOW. [0] Delta (CAP: >>22374)

Tuesday 12.08.2020

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/11709084.html#11953143 ————————————–——– We're Not Gonna Take It (CAP: >>11953295)

>>26568

>Literally doing exactly what we need you too with every deletion.

this

Steisand Effect turned up to 11

thank you Dart

>>26569

>Is it possible Qagg is comped and they put a delay on when they posted Trumps truth?

no

>>26544

>To destroy our credibility

kek

we have credibility?

thats not how this shit works

our information does not spread on the basis ofOURcredibility as mongolian basket weavers

that would be

retarded

our information spreads on the basis of its content

and the merits therin

credibility fagging is like complaining about what story the MSM is going to run about next because we are discussing "X" topic

>>26588

you can all call me a faggot for pushing "fake Q" if it all ends up turning out fake and ghey

kek

o7

>>26593

>Block that nigger.

naahhhhh

would be a feather in his CAP

>>26601

thank you for your service to the kitchen

>>26609

>How bad is GraveyardBaker going to shit herself

a colostomy bag will be required

>>26607

looks good here bakes

all links are linky

the board jews are currenly in furious debate

point the spam bots at /hm/ to slide our discussion

or

keep them pointed at /qr/ to maintain the appearnace of traffic

>>26615

>So you are telling me Qagg can't spoof the truth timestamps on their own website? I don't believe that for a moment.

NOT WHEN THE TIMESTAMP IS THE SAME ON TRUTH SOCIAL

if qagg.news spoofed the timestamp

it would beDIFFERENTthan the one currenly reported for the post ON TRUTH SOCIAL RIGHT NOW

qagg.news and Truth Social are reporting the SAME timestamp

ergo

qagg.news is not spoofing the timestamp

If we ever CATCH qagg.new reporting a DIFFERENT timestamp than Truth Social

then we can talk about that

but that has never happened before

and you always have the Truth Social post to check

the qagg.news screenshot was used because it has seconds stamps

if we are going to walk down the road of:

all 0 detla's are comp'd becuase timestamps on 8kun are fucky

then make THAT claim

because that is a REASONABLE claim

>>26615

>It is totally possible to generate a fake zero delta with a POTUS account.

did twitter ever report the seconds on the timestamp?

>>26623

okay okay

I see what your saying

you are addressing specifically the seconds place

I missed your point, kek

>>26627

>everything originating from here is in question.

true that

>>26622

>I mean it appears that Q posted, then DJT. But I am saying it could happen the other way around

true

it would require one of two things (or perhaps both working together)

JCrew has comped qagg.news

(I dont consider this likely because of how well qagg.news works -JCrew did not code that, kek)

JCrew has comp'd the "timeserver" function for 8kun so royally that 8kun somehow exists some number of second "in the future" relative the rest of the internet (with regards to timestamp reporting)

I.E.

the world GPS clock reports time is

12:00:00

8kun timeserver at that SAME moment reports time as:

12:00:30

so start with the premise that 8kun is 30 seconds ahead of everyone else on the internet

no, Jcrew inserts some standard amount of post lag

so even though the timeserver is "living in the furutre"

when we "attempt" to test it

normal posting het "held in a que" and then gets posted with a "more correct" timestamp

and anytime Jim wants to

he can fire off posts that BYPASS this cue

and look like they are 30 seoonds in the future

ergo

he could have a fake Q post all lined up

finger on the reply button

POTUS Truth social post hits the screen

click the reply button

post on 8kun comes in 30 seconds "in the future"

BOOM

proof Jcrew just got a 0 delta with a signed Q post that was posted "some number of seconds" before POTUS

>>26630

>First Truth Social doesn't display posts down to the second, we are trusting Qagg

did twitter ever report second stamps?

>>26635

looks like no

here is an old 0 delta Q proof (this one actually being a [-1] delta)

check the CAP

twitter

no seconds stamp

>>26635

>>26630

>If there is an automated system in place to make a Q post a pre-generated fake Q post, the moment PDJT truths, a Zero delta can be easily faked.

and if 8kun timeservers are being fucky with the timestamps

the 8kun server could bake up a special "future" timestamp for the planned fake Q post

>>26639

>the 8kun server could bake up a special "future" timestamp

FREDDY!

I demand an answer

kek

is this feasable in code?

I dont "think" so

timestamps are usualy locked in at the kernel level

and tied pretty hard to the timeserver that has been selected

>>26638

kek

looks at this old proof

this proof is from the first time we confirmed Q on 8kun after it went live

check the timestamp

its only a -1 delta instead of a 0 delta because Q got a 09:55:59 timestamp

we have already proven you can "wait" for a given timestamp on the clock

hit the reply button

and you will get a timestamp that is BEFORE you clicked the reply button

so image

for that proof

Q is sitting there

waiting for 09:56:00 to post

so POTUS can also post @09:56:00 +some number of seconds

09:56:00 exactly strikes the clock

Q hits "reply"

timestamp comes back as:

09:55:59

I have a strong suspicion that is what happened

kek

>>26641

>assuming you're not putting fake information into the DB directly like what happened earlier that very day wherein replay attack with user (you)'s preserved

very

good

point

>>26642

agree with all stated

>>26644

>For this to work you would have to ignore that the ZD poster had 2 other posts in the bread last night that were in response to other posts.

ding ding ding

not only do you have to have this script set up to autofire

it would have had to be running constantly, acting like an "organic" 'maybe Q' anon

or Jim had to be sitting at the controlsat the right moment for it to happen

just waiting for that POTUS TS post

its a HUGE stretch

>>26649

>then fake Q posts at 12:00:13 but with a delay of 4-5 seconds

clicked @12:00:13 with a DELAY of 4-5 seconds would = 12:00:17

but yeah

I had it backwards

8kun would need to be living some number os seconds "in the past"

so when something happensNOW

like a POTUS Truth post

a post can be made that isNOW+4-5 seconds

and that post will getBACK DATEDlike 10-20 seonds INTO THE PAST

so that it looks like the post that was madeNOW+4-5 seconds

acrually happened BEFORENOW

yes

this is incredibly difficult to keep straight in my head

thinking about mutiple non-synchronous timelines makes my brain screach

>>26651

>if dart deleted a real qpost, (which considering the reaction that happened, is not unlikely).. the reaction makes sense.

this

last night

after everyone went to bed

I went through the bread from start to finish just to see how it all played out chronologically

when I did that

99.9% of my doubt evaporated

>>26650

kek

>>26655

>one shit posting

Jim was shitposting when he red text all caps called out the new Q post?

NEW Q

and it was Jim shitposting here?

(not disputing, just running through the logic)

>>>/qresearch/16653509

>75a063

>Actually, it was EtheFriend that wrote that post.

here is the full reply chain that "Q" post is a replying too

>>26426

>>26662

>We could also check the metadata from Truth Social, though

I will look into that

>>26662

>We could also check the metadata from Truth Social

this is from inspecting the timestamp element on the html page source

"...

<span class="text-sm text-gray-500 dark:text-gray-300 font-normal tracking-normal font-sans normal-case">Jul 06, 2022, 22:59</span>

..."

>>26673

nice anon

fucking nice

>>26675

>How would you backdate the post number though?

I cant explain it

I can only report what I have witnessed

all links (pb)

>>25877, >>25884, >>25889, >>25893, >>25896, >>25898, >>25901, >>25902, >>25904, >>25922 8kun Server Time is fucky

>>26677

>while true, it is known that he's handed off the keys to his admins, who are cicada fags.

>so it is completely unknown what state the codebase is even in, now

this

I agree Jim is no 1337 haxxor

but we have no idea who he has given the keys of the kingdom too

Thomas Schoenberger is a literal CIA asset handler

there is no telling what kind of glowfag cybertools could be in play here

>>26685

Kash is directly replying to anon

anon sharing .gif meme in celebration of new TS feature

Kash actually replied to that anon who is posting in this bread

fuck hashtags

anons just got a Kashtag

kek

>>26688

>anons just got a Kashtag

its fun having fun

>>26699

>nothing to indicate that any of these timestamps have been rolled backwards 8 seconds.

I have shared plenty of screenshot proof

but I will do it right now just to re-iterate the point

I bet I can get one in less than 5 tries

1:12:40

1:13:05

1:13:20

1:13:35

1:13:55

>>26705

2 seconds back timed

>>26708

2 seconds back timed

>>25884

3 seconds back timed

>>25901

2 seconds back timed

an example from almost a month ago

4 seconds back-timed

>>26712

3 seconds back timed

>>26714

>2 seconds is not 14 seconds and 8 seconds

agreed

how do we know this is the worst it can get?

how do we know the root acct cant accomplish an ever greater disparity?

I am postulating a possibility:

the 8kun timeserver exists "some number of seconds" in the past

every "normal" users post gets the gap added back

(I have no idea how this would be accomplished)

so its does look like this is the case

but it doesnt aways work perfectly

and we can see variances as high as 4 seconds on our side

anytime the root account wants to

it can make posts without adding the gap back

and they could potentially look like there is an even larger variance

this is all supposition based on brainstorming

>>26721

>For what you are claiming you would have to see something like

ohh

you mean like this?

>>26721

>Every single post in chronological order.

the timestamp back-dating is only half of what I have been tracking re-post chronology errors

they DO end up OUT OF CHRONOLOGICAL order TOO

see: >>26724

test>>26727

>No, because that was one person spamming 10x posts at the same time.

ahhkchually

thats just that example

I have MANY MANY other examples of this happening

>>26727

-->>26728

>>26728

>I have MANY MANY other examples of this happening

>>26731

anon

I dont think you understand whay I am communicating

I am not invalidating the Q proof

I am sharing what I have been tracking re: timestamp fuckery and post chronology errors for the past MONTHS

I am sharing how this could POSSIBLY effect the "gaming" of a zero delta

in an effort to DISPROVE the likelyhood that the zero delta was gamed

I am in the "I think the zero deltas are Q camp"

but I am going to ananyze this situation as critically as I know how

becuase I think it deserves the scrutiny

I keep throwing up these arguments SO THAT WE CAN KNOCK THEM DOWN USING LOGIC

if all the arguments AGAINST are refuted using LOGIC

then the 0 delta proof of Q's IDEN stands

and again

this is a thinking for yourself situation

I am not disctating that anyone else uphold my opinion on the subject

>>26735

>I understand completely, and I am saying if that happened it would be obvious as fuck because the 0 delta would be completely out of sync with the posts around it by a large margin.

okay

I see the point you are making

if all the "normal posters" exist in onetime delta

and then JCrew slips in a "0 delta" post that exits in a DIFFERENTtime deltathan "normal posters"

there would be amuch largervariance for the Jcrew post

relative to the "normal anon posts

okay

that logic stands

>>26735

>Normal post :14

>Normal post :17

>Normal post :19

>Normal post :03 < Zero Delta (large timestamp variance indicating Jcrew post)

>Normal post :21

>Normal post :25

5:5

I will agree

if they are gaming the timestamps like I am braintorming about

it would look more like the above with a much larger variance for the "gamed" 0 delta post

>>26739

I have noticed a much higher captcha frequency as well

I think it may be per-post now

and set to something like 20-30 posts

>>26743

bahahahahahahahahahahahaah

every single anon witnessing /comms/ crew ban/deleteing Q from /qresearch/ is really close to making it "worth it" to have "lost the board" to those absolute faggots

>>26749

wew lads

things are slowly crystalizing as I accept the likelyhood of everything last night being legit

Q said no more posts on /qr/

EVER

so that would mean we dont have to scrape those faggot breads for 0 delta's

yaaaaaay

okay

first implication I see

given the (currently) still rather low PPM average on this board

gaming a zero dela over here on /hm/ would be astronomically more difficult than /qr/

especially if Q was a bro and did it during a posting dead zone when no other anons had posted in a while

>>26758

I have a strong suspicion the [two] 0 delta POTUS truths we have seen so far both contain Easter eggs that directly connect to Q drops they 0 delta'd with

Just no one has found them yet

Although, I will always share your desire for a more "obvious" connection

>>26770

interesting

based kash