Strelok ID: 714888 May 22, 2019, 8:50 p.m. No.674806   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0854 >>9242

>>674118

Is that even a legitimate Army Technical Manual? I've tried researching this in the past since a lot of the shit seems kind of fishy and the writing style seems inconsistent with the style of verified legitimate technical manuals that I've read, and just intuitively it seems like material that would be more well-suited to a field-manual rather than a technical manual. The Library of Congress doesn't have it indexed in field manuals or technical manuals, and I don't think it's because the information is deemed dangerous as there is plenty of "dangerous" material cataloged, indexed, and in the public domain that are indexed here.

 

https://www.loc.gov/rr/scitech/SciRefGuides/technicalmanuals4.html

https://www.loc.gov/rr/scitech/SciRefGuides/fieldmanuals.html

 

Is there literally any proof that TM 31-210 isn't some Anarchist Cookbook tier LARP?