Anonymous ID: addaad Dec. 11, 2020, 9:24 p.m. No.22438   🗄️.is 🔗kun

hey wakes

Good stuff!

Generally, sounds like what you're trying to do is create better, more directly relevant notables and discourage glittering generalities, 'headline news', breaking but unsauced reports, and anything else that doesn't really contribute much to our work.

 

My version of something similar with various tweaks and suggestions. Not so much a critique as a slightly different perspective but with many similarities:

 

Mission:

The mission of /MidnightRiders/ is to research, aggregate, and disseminate evidenced-based information for the use of Q patriots the world around. The information must be relevant, related to Q, Q++, and the effort to provide accurate, uncensored information to people of the global community. Information should encourage the reader to continue independent research as necessary.

>changed the info warfare part bc we are also engaged in info warfare - but with the goal of cutting thru the MSM lies.

 

With this in mind, the best notables would be:

  • well-sauced (perhaps citing multiple sources or posts with previous digs)

  • well-reasoned (carefully presently analyses that cite sauce whenever possible)

  • likely to be useful to anons (not stuff most already know)

  • directly relevant to Q drops or other issues highlighted by Q or POTUS

  • __particularly good for redpilling: (short vids, extra- clear charts, etc. - with the 'punch' to change peoples' minds)

 

Examples of stuff that would NOT be as 'on point'

  • material already known to most anons

  • repetitions of same material previously noted (try not to include the same story over and over)

  • idle speculation w/little or no sauce

  • trendy stuff that's not really relevant (the stupid oblique comes to mind….)

  • sensational articles like many by UK-Sun & other rags (unless they really have a worthwhile scoop)

 

I for one still support FOR KEKS material if it's really good!

 

Bun examples can be as follows:

#100

>>0007 LawFare: 300K sealed indictments as of 12/15/2021

>>0006 Euro News: Protests result in a free French nation.

>>0005 Diggz: Hunter Biden is only half as bad as his dad

>>0004 Social Media: Fagbook outted as a CIA spy op. Certain individuals in the crosshairs.

>>0003 Politics: The following states have these corrupt pols

>>0002 Business: POTUS approves chapter 7 bankruptcy for the Federal Reserve

>>0001 Military: Troops activated across the United States to detain and arrest rogue politicians

 

>Comment: Anons like categories but it can be tricky, have done it on /qrb/ a little. Bakers vary in both their interest in such an approach and also the way they categorize things; would need to let this be fluid i think for best results. Also, many things can be in more than one category….a keyword approach might be of interest (pick several keywords or keycodes for posts)

 

It also allows aggregators to move content to certains areas on their websites for maximum expoure for public consumption.

>Could be useful. Need more info from aggregators?

 

>Bakers will need to adjust the pastebin to ensure typical research links are present:

Federal Court filing url, Federal Sealed Indictments url, etc.

<can't quite envision how this would work, i'm not particularly well-versed in gov't research. Could anons simply be asked to be consciencious about providing sauce?

 

-frb

Anonymous ID: addaad Dec. 11, 2020, 9:28 p.m. No.22439   🗄️.is 🔗kun

hey wakes

Good stuff!

Generally, sounds like what you're trying to do is create better, more directly relevant notables and discourage glittering generalities, 'headline news', breaking but unsauced reports, and anything else that doesn't really contribute much to our work.

 

My version of something similar with various tweaks and suggestions. Not so much a critique as a slightly different perspective but with many similarities:

 

Mission:

The mission of /MidnightRiders/ is to research, aggregate, and disseminate evidenced-based information for the use of Q patriots the world around. The information must be relevant, related to Q, Q++, and the effort to provide accurate, uncensored information to people of the global community. Information should encourage the reader to continue independent research as necessary.

>changed the info warfare part bc we are also engaged in info warfare - but with the goal of cutting thru the MSM lies.

 

With this in mind, the best notables would be:

  • well-sauced (perhaps citing multiple sources or posts with previous digs)

  • well-reasoned (carefully presently analyses that cite sauce whenever possible)

  • likely to be useful to anons (not stuff most already know)

  • directly relevant to Q drops or other issues highlighted by Q or POTUS

  • particularly good for redpilling: (short vids, extra- clear charts, etc. - with the 'punch' to change peoples' minds)

 

Examples of stuff that would NOT be as 'on point'

  • material already known to most anons

  • repetitions of same material previously noted (try not to include the same story over and over)

  • idle speculation w/little or no sauce

  • trendy stuff that's not really relevant (the stupid oblique comes to mind….)

  • sensational articles like many by UK-Sun & other rags (unless they really have a worthwhile scoop)

 

I for one still support FOR KEKS material if it's really good!

 

Bun examples can be as follows:

#100

>>0007 LawFare: 300K sealed indictments as of 12/15/2021

>>0006 Euro News: Protests result in a free French nation.

>>0005 Diggz: Hunter Biden is only half as bad as his dad

>>0004 Social Media: Fagbook outted as a CIA spy op. Certain individuals in the crosshairs.

>>0003 Politics: The following states have these corrupt pols

>>0002 Business: POTUS approves chapter 7 bankruptcy for the Federal Reserve

>>0001 Military: Troops activated across the United States to detain and arrest rogue politicians

 

Comment on categorizing: Anons like categories but it can be tricky, have done it on /qrb/ a little. Bakers vary in both their interest in such an approach and also the way they categorize things; would need to let this be fluid i think for best results. Also, many things can be in more than one category….a keyword approach might be of interest (pick several keywords or keycodes for posts). Can get complex fast so….not advocating, just mentioning.

 

It also allows aggregators to move content to certains areas on their websites for maximum expoure for public consumption.

>Could be useful. Need more info from aggregators?

 

Bakers will need to adjust the pastebin to ensure typical research links are present:

Federal Court filing url, Federal Sealed Indictments url, etc.

<can't quite envision how this would work, i'm not particularly well-versed in gov't research. Could anons simply be asked to be consciencious about providing sauce?

 

-frb

Anonymous ID: addaad Dec. 11, 2020, 9:30 p.m. No.22441   🗄️.is 🔗kun

hey wakes

Good stuff!

Generally, sounds like what you're trying to do is create better, more directly relevant notables and discourage glittering generalities, 'headline news', breaking but unsauced reports, and anything else that doesn't really contribute much to our work.

 

My version of something similar with various tweaks and suggestions. Not so much a critique as a slightly different perspective but with many similarities:

 

Mission:

The mission of /MidnightRiders/ is to research, aggregate, and disseminate evidenced-based information for the use of Q patriots the world around. The information must be relevant, related to Q, Q++, and the effort to provide accurate, uncensored information to people of the global community. Information should encourage the reader to continue independent research as necessary.

>changed the info warfare part bc we are also engaged in info warfare - but with the goal of cutting thru the MSM lies.

 

With this in mind, the best notables would be:

  • well-sauced (perhaps citing multiple sources or posts with previous digs)

  • well-reasoned (carefully presently analyses that cite sauce whenever possible)

  • likely to be useful to anons (not stuff most already know)

  • directly relevant to Q drops or other issues highlighted by Q or POTUS

  • particularly good for redpilling: (short vids, extra- clear charts, etc. - with the 'punch' to change peoples' minds)

 

Examples of stuff that would NOT be as 'on point'

  • material already known to most anons

  • repetitions of same material previously noted (try not to include the same story over and over)

  • idle speculation w/little or no sauce

  • trendy stuff that's not really relevant (the stupid oblique comes to mind….)

  • sensational articles like many by UK-Sun & other rags (unless they really have a worthwhile scoop)

 

I for one still support FOR KEKS material if it's really good!

 

Bun examples can be as follows:

#100

>>0007 LawFare: 300K sealed indictments as of 12/15/2021

>>0006 Euro News: Protests result in a free French nation.

>>0005 Diggz: Hunter Biden is only half as bad as his dad

>>0004 Social Media: Fagbook outted as a CIA spy op. Certain individuals in the crosshairs.

>>0003 Politics: The following states have these corrupt pols

>>0002 Business: POTUS approves chapter 7 bankruptcy for the Federal Reserve

>>0001 Military: Troops activated across the United States to detain and arrest rogue politicians

 

Comment on categorizing:

>Anons like categories but it can be tricky, have done it on /qrb/ a little. Bakers vary in both their interest in such an approach and also the way they categorize things; would need to let this be fluid i think for best results. Also, many things can be in more than one category….a keyword approach might be of interest (pick several keywords or keycodes for posts). Can get complex fast so….not advocating, just mentioning.

 

It also allows aggregators to move content to certains areas on their websites for maximum expoure for public consumption.

>Could be useful. Need more info from aggregators?

 

Bakers will need to adjust the pastebin to ensure typical research links are present:

Federal Court filing url, Federal Sealed Indictments url, etc.

>can't quite envision how this would work, i'm not particularly well-versed in gov't research. Could anons simply be asked to be consciencious about providing sauce?

 

-frb

https://qanonbin.com/paste/cTititdVm