>>2902
Baking seminar:
>>2902
whoops let's try the whole thing again....
Baking Seminar #38 Th 7pm ET
Continuation of discussion on Q #4938
from last week. See the recap below for a catch-up.
Recap of last week's discussion in #37 on Q asking for cleanup
PLEASE FIX THE BREAD AND TIDY UP THE SHIP. -Q
>>>/comms/38451 Why was a Q drop necessary?
Bakers respond - big picture
>>>/comms/38628, >>>/comms/38630, >>>/comms/38633, >>>/comms/38641, >>>/comms/38642, >>>/comms/38647, >>>/comms/38660, >>>/comms/38679, >>>/comms/38693, >>>/comms/38701 Baker 1's take (April: WR problem & bin system made to deal with it)
>>>/comms/38634, >>>/comms/38664, >>>/comms/38688 Baker 2's take (what kind of cleanup? FJ role - see below also)
>>>/comms/38676, >>>/comms/38676, >>>/comms/38681, >>>/comms/38683 If OSS is the problem, why did ya'll let him bake? (Hard to stop - but see >>>/comms/38681)
>>>/comms/38646, >>>/comms/38663 Bakers on OSS name and avatar (image) - looked hinky
>>>/comms/38695, >>>/comms/38696, >>>/comms/38697 Other anon/baker comments on the situation
Was there a two-pronged attack by OSS and /comms/ bakers?
>>>/comms/38643 Anon asks about this
>>>/comms/38674, >>>/comms/38707, >>>/comms/38647 (at the bottom) Bakers say there was NEVER two-pronged attack
FJack's potential role in all this
>>>/comms/38688, >>>/comms/38709, >>>/comms/38709 Baker comments
>>>/comms/38700 Why can't BO delete the dup breads? (He can - but up til now, he hasn't)
OSS response & rebuttal
>>>/comms/39197, >>>/comms/39202, >>>/comms/39219 OSS responds
>>>/comms/39245 Rebuttal
Also:
>>>/comms/38626, >>>/comms/38627, >>>/comms/38644 , >>>/comms/38680 Comments on the dough and how to improve it
Candace Owens
@RealCandaceO
Twitter LOCKED my account until I removed the screenshot of Hunter Biden’s text convo with his mother about sexual allegations with a minor.
The REAL texts violate their “child sexual exploitation” policy.
@JoeBiden
you & Hunter are guilty as sin &
@jack
can’t cover that up!
https://twitter.com/RealCandaceO/status/1321509976628731904
yes saw it
then someone said they needed an anon handoff
part of the new "non baker" newspeak
confusing
yes they need a baker @440
but bread faggots still saying comms is comp'd
so mebbe those faggots can ebake
o7
indeed.
anons as a whole have to figure out what really matters to them
and how to sort out a confusing situation
(make it a priority to really find out 'sup)
some still think OSS and /comms/ are doing a two-pronged attack on the board
see >>>/comms/38643
also think it's warroom
distinctive signature
Wish it were easier to explain what is really going on. It's crystal clear from my pov but i honestly think a lot of anons still don't know what to think
And there are shills every bread reinforcing the narrative that /comms/ is comp'd
OR
that troubles are due to a "bread war" in the kitchen betweening dueling 'factions'
OR
that it's the "famefag" ("non-anon") bakers who are behind the problems (even after OSS went back to a named pbin - and there are several bakers using names: DaAnon, sine_nomine = barkeep baker)
That is understandable anon.
There's a handful of us who are intimately acquainted with the current situation, having been early targets of the current OP - i am the one OSS calls "comms Karen".
Is you have q's, please ask. But respect your pov - trust yourself, Q+ and Q - as well.
>drama
No ordinary anons or bakers want more drama. There's more than enough in real life right now. Having a stable, fact-oriented board is a relief.
o7
kekking…..
o7
Last night, anon on /qr/ was defending the idea that anons should all be checking up on one another.
I was wracking my brain trying to think of a reply that would convey the problem i saw with that idea. That would actually cut through the shit.
Something about the value of being mindful but not suspicious. MIndfulness means being situationally aware of what's unfolding around you - being alert wo/ too easily jumping to conclusions. Suspiciousness by contrast is grounded in fear - and promotes a reactive response. It's only SHILLS that benefit from that.
my 2cents.
>WR as bad as OSS/animefag
Kind of sad. Gerbil not malicious in my experience but does a lot of damage even so. Never bends or changes. Kek.
>no nuance
uh…yeah you could say that! (kekking in spite of myself)
>fruits
of course - but not many really track this. used to post my bakes when called out by fj - highly effective in the moment. but anon pool is constantly turning over, so the collective memory of bakes/bakers fades pretty quick. why it's important for the group of 'core anons' who never leave to be as aware of board trends as possible.
Qresear.ch
Anyone having trouble accessing it?
Haven't been able to reach on either Chrome or Firefox since at least last night.
isitupordown.net says UP.
Finally got to it thru on Tor, but it took multiple tries and over a minute to finally open.
you could well be right - always hard to discern motives based on partial info. and about gerbil barging in at the right time - convenient isn't it?
WR taken out yesterday, back today…..