>>53712

TYB

Raheem Kassam

@RaheemKassam

WOW!

Evidence that the powers that be KNEW in advance that certain groups were planning to make the MAGA rally on January 6th violent.

…they did nothing to stop it.

https://twitter.com/RaheemKassam/status/1358078845929332744

‘Inconsistent, Conflicting’ And Ignored Threat Assessments Ahead of Jan 6 Capitol Attack.

A New York Times report has let the cat out of the bag: that law enforcement either knew and did nothing about the potential for violence on January 6th, or issued conflicting and inconsistent threat assessments ahead of the events at the U.S. Capitol.

The news will raise questions as to why authorities allowed a predominantly peaceful Trump speech and rally in Washington, D.C. to be infiltrated and overtaken by forces who had planned for violence in advance.

Questions will also be asked about why authorities immediately claimed President Donald Trump had “incited” the riot with his speech at the Ellipse outside the White House when we now know much of the violent behavior was pre-meditated.

The New York Times reported on Friday afternoon:

On Jan. 4, the intelligence division of the U.S. Capitol Police issued a report listing all the groups known to be descending on the city… The documents show how the police and federal law enforcement agencies produced inconsistent and sometimes conflicting assessments of the threat from American citizens marching on the Capitol.

The article called intelligence “muddled,” saying almost every code word for “institutional failures” without using the term itself.

Biden donor and new Capitol Hill Police Chief Yogananda Pittman admitted last week: “We knew that there was a strong potential for violence and that Congress was the target… but we did not do enough.”

And the New York Times also makes clear of another FBI failure on January 6th, making this the bureau’s more recent in a long, recent history of intelligence and operational flubs.

“The FBI was aware of violent online posts before the rally, with the bureau’s field office in Norfolk, Virginia, issuing a report that flagged one anonymous thread that warned of a looming war at the Capitol.”

They also make clear in the report that the groups at fault are entities that Donald Trump has – a number of times – denounced:

Still, the mob that stormed the Capitol was filled with members of groups that the FBI had identified as domestic terrorism threats, like militias, white supremacists and adherents of the QAnon conspiracy.

President Trump is on the record condemning white supremacy, and said in August last year: “I don’t know much about [QAnon].”

The news will raise further questions about why intelligence and law enforcement agencies – and the political leaders they respond to – did nothing in advance of the events.

You can read the full New York Times report here.

https://news.yahoo.com/muddled-intelligence-hampered-response-capitol-194600524.html

https://thenationalpulse.com/news/inconsistent-conflicting-and-ignored-threat-assessments-ahead-of-jan-6-capitol-attack/

>>53744

Absolute Proof Documentary with Mike Lindell

All links checked and good (2.6.20)

https://michaeljlindell.com/

https://rumble.com/vdkz6j-absolute-proof-with-mike-lindell.html?mref=5z34n&mrefc=2

https://rumble.com/vdlebn-mike-lindell-absolute-proof-exposing-election-fraud-and-the-theft-of-americ.html

https://www.bitchute.com/video/WNP5InC3q6Q0/

https://www.brighteon.com/e8e60473-1452-4a81-8cb5-836baa42936b

https://tv.gab.com/channel/realmikelindell/view/absolute-proof-601d73a5a5ca1b4ef4f0e602

Downloads

https://zb10-7gsop1v78.bitchute.com/IIC6VbV69ioF/WNP5InC3q6Q0.mp4

https://anonfiles.com/j4u1RaF1p5/Mike_Lindell_-_Absolute_Proof.mp4_720p_torrent

Jim Hoft / Gateway Pundit has been suspended from twitter.

@gatewaypundit

https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit

Brad Parscale

@parscale

Statement to Trump:

“If they only impeached you twice, you need to run again. Because to change the system you have to kick it in the a#$. I would love to be the only President to be impeached three times. Because history remembers those that didn’t conform.

I’m in, are you?”

https://twitter.com/parscale/status/1358096468398202880

Rasmussen Reports

@Rasmussen_Poll

"Absolute Proof" Summary

-2hr runtime

-All 3 Navarro Repts evidence revisited.

-Starting on Nov 1st, 'White Hat' U.S. hackers captured terabytes of data indicating foreign electronic intrusions into 2995 county election systems in real-time.

-Dominion denies any of this happened.

https://twitter.com/Rasmussen_Poll/status/1357812364243042310

>>53761

Mike's saying -

• he's going to invite the Dominion guys to a public meeting to go through all the evidence in Absolute Proof

• IF they don't, he's ready to sue Dominion so the truth can be told in court

Exclusive – Adviser: Trump Considers Launching His Own Social Media Platform

Jason Miller, a senior adviser to former President Donald Trump, revealed on Saturday that the former president is considering launching his own social media platform in the not-too-distant future.

The news, which comes after Trump was banned permanently from Twitter and indefinitely from Facebook, came during Miller’s appearance on Breitbart News Saturday on SiriusXM 125 the Patriot Channel.

“I would expect that we will see the president reemerge on social media,” Miller said when asked what Trump plans to do next. “Whether that’s joining an existing platform or creating his new platform, there are a number of different options and a number of different meetings that they’ve been having on that front. Nothing is imminent on that.”

Asked about what a Trump social network—called something like “Trumper” or something similar—would look like, Miller was circumspect but said the former president is considering both joining existing new platforms or launching his own competitor to the tech giants in Silicon Valley.

“All options are on the table,” Miller said. “A number of things are being discussed. Stay tuned there because you know he’s going to be back on social media. We’re just kind of figuring out which avenue makes the most sense.”

As of mid-January before Democrat President Joe Biden’s inauguration, Facebook’s Chief Operating Officer (COO) Sheryl Sandberg told NBC News that the social network has “no plans” to lift Trump’s indefinite ban anytime soon.

Twitter, meanwhile, has made its ban of the former president’s account permanent. “I do not celebrate or feel pride in our having to ban @realDonaldTrump from Twitter,“ Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey wrote in a thread explaining his company’s move, adding, ”I believe this was the right decision for Twitter.”

Potential existing alternatives that Trump could join include Parler, who the then-president’s campaign officials reportedly met with last summer to discuss Trump joining the platform, or Gab, another platform that has successfully battled blacklisting by Silicon Valley and financial institutions. If Trump seeks to build his own platform, that would be a massive undertaking and require lots of investment and technological infrastructure. But with his personality and supporters—75 million Americans voted for him in 2020, the most votes a sitting president has ever gotten in history—fueling it, it could end up being successful.

Trump has long battled big tech, and told Breitbart News in an exclusive interview in the Oval Office in August last year that “100 percent” the big tech companies like Twitter, Facebook, and Google, are trying to control information that Americans see. “Do you have a doubt?” Trump said when asked if they are trying to control the information flow to the public.

“The tech companies are very dishonest about that and about free speech,” Trump told Breitbart News. “It could be a big problem for them at the appropriate time.”

LISTEN TO JASON MILLER ON BREITBART NEWS SATURDAY:

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/02/06/exclusive-adviser-trump-considers-launching-his-own-social-media-platform/

Greenwalkd on starting a rival media org

Glenn Greenwald

@ggreenwald

There have been a lot of discussions about this and a lot of progress made toward it. As is turns out, super-rich people are not extremely fond of parting with their money even for projects they support - that's one reason they're super-rich I suppose - but this seems inevitable:

Kaveh Shahrooz

@kshahrooz

Serious question: why are investors not stepping up, gathering all the excellent journalists who are driven out of mainstream publications, and starting a rival media org? I think there's a real hunger for good journalism/opinions that are not run through ideological filters.

https://twitter.com/kshahrooz/status/1358061240745144320

Something like this would work, and would only be valuable, if it included real reporting teams. Lots of focus is on the way repressive and illiberal climates restrict opinion writing - and of course it's done that - but first & foremost it's contaminated reporting.

It's true that new digital media outlets have failed to succeed financially, hence part of the reluctance. But the subscription model works, and there is a huge hunger for reporting, writing & content liberated from repressive chains. It will work journalistically & financially.

https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1358200330316570625