>>58930 Thank you Baker!

>>59039 PDJT's Executive Order 13768 of January 25, 2017 cites the relevant US code that is used to bolster his orders. Section 9 regarding withholding sanctuary cities' federal funding was successfully challenged in court and there are civil cases still outstanding. However, since there are laws already on the books to back up PDJT's EO, does rescinding them then break US law? Seems to me that if Biden is rescinding orders to follow the law, he is knowingly breaking the law.

Keep hoping that the small-b biden EOs are a tripwire.

From PDJT's order: …Sec. 5. Enforcement Priorities. In executing faithfully the immigration laws of the United States, the Secretary of Homeland Security (Secretary) shall prioritize for removal those aliens described by the Congress in sections 212(a)(2), (a)(3), and (a)(6)(C), 235, and 237(a)(2) and (4) of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(2), (a)(3), and (a)(6)(C), 1225, and 1227(a)(2) and (4)), as well as removable aliens who: …(moar @ link)

PDJT's EO: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/01/30/2017-02102/enhancing-public-safety-in-the-interior-of-the-united-states

small-b biden's: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/01/25/2021-01768/revision-of-civil-immigration-enforcement-policies-and-priorities