Anonymous ID: 8268d4 Feb. 19, 2021, 4:33 a.m. No.60002   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0012

>>59930 (lb)

The attack actually circumvents captcha entirely. It was known they were able to get around that over a year ago. I still think you could implement logins and keep it anonymous.

Anonymous ID: 8268d4 Feb. 19, 2021, 5:31 a.m. No.60020   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0021

>>60007

Love that man. So thankful for him with each day that passes, and this movement; which will carry on no matter how many boards they attack.

 

>>60012

Yep; they are talking about it in the current bread.

/sigh

It's not unfair to say many people have become attached the idea of Qresearch. But letting it go isn't losing. Letting it go is shedding an attachment to a board that the idea represents. That idea is something that is happening on a regular basis outside of qresearch. Mission accomplished, and missions forward.

 

>>>/qresearch/12999193

>>>/qresearch/12999339

>It's clearly the BO/8bit and that group.

>>>/qresearch/12999439

>>>/qresearch/12999977

>What's funny is that they're pushing for the post per captcha like FJ suggested

Anonymous ID: 8268d4 Feb. 19, 2021, 6:05 a.m. No.60028   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>60021

>anons weren't paying attention

Ain't that the truth.

 

I'm genuinely curious about a few things:

  1. How many actual unique IDs visited (not actively posting, mind you ,just hits) during the highest traffic days of /qresearch/?

  2. Did Ron ever sit next to Jason Miller on TrumpForce1?

  3. Was Dan the "Thundercats" anon?

  4. Does the Forbidden City have a gift shop?

  5. How long is OnlyFans going to last? @LailaMickelwait is going to have a difficult time suing individual content creators, one at a time.

  6. Speaking of @LailaMickelwait, why not just go directly after the shit on the DW instead of PH and others? They've said that they are the same content hosts, but completely ignore the filth as it sits, plain as day, on a plethora of sites on the DW.

 

>>60023

>>60024

>>60025

>>60026

FF here. DNS settings in SS. Sometimes I get errors, but usually get through just fine.

Anonymous ID: 8268d4 Feb. 19, 2021, 6:12 a.m. No.60032   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>60018

>Doubt we will be getting anything else from Q at this point. the purpose has been served.

I agree, generally. The methodology of gathering information, digging on it, meme'ing things from it, and spreading truth is something that doesn't require a singular dedicated board. Though I still think it would've been neato to see a "Citizen Journalism" official gov webpage with some controls in place to mirror qresearch before he "left" office.

 

>patriots may very well be in control, but no plan is full proof.

I think this plan might actually be. The reason I say that is theorizing how it's made it this far. Made a post yesterday with the theory that PDJT is still absolutely in control, and a majority of people are controlled because the know the US Mil thread is real, and PDJT has dirt on them all; enough to scare the shit out of them, and make them do what he wants them to do.

Anonymous ID: 8268d4 Feb. 19, 2021, 8:47 a.m. No.60106   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>60104

Someone most definitely getting tired of tor posting to get around other issues on qresearch. They tanked it pretty hard. Clearnet's fine, though.