Ruh roh, Raggy.

https://twitter.com/EmeraldRobinson/status/1324778604245504000

@EmeraldRobinson

Lots of my followers have been asking me to check into a story that DHS put a watermark on election ballots to verify them.

So I checked.

Would you like to hear what I found out?

This also ties into a post in /qresearch/ from earlier:

>>>/qresearch/11499960

>>7624

Seems quite notable.

Hmmm intensifies…

https://twitter.com/CISAKrebs/status/1324799793709928449

@CISAKrebs

Police cars revolving light

Rumor Control Update

Police cars revolving light

Contrary to #disinfo floating around, @CISAgov

doesn't print or audit ballots! We offer @cyber

support to state & local elex officials. Don't fall for these efforts to confuse & undermine confidence in the election! http://cisa.gov/rumorcontrol#rumor19

#Protect2020

(See first screenshot).

But then, there's this:

https://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/471577-dhs-cyber-agency-invests-in-election-auditing-tool-to-secure-2020?amp&__twitter_impression=true

DHS cyber agency invests in election auditing tool to secure 2020 elections

And this:

https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/mail-in-voting-election-integrity-safeguards_508.pdf?fbclid=IwAR2JVr7eHgYdyMq1s7fohrGYKzE4oBgZI9FmHq5avGsbulJDls0qdzvBvpE

(Second screenshot)

And a nifty summary from Emerald:

https://twitter.com/EmeraldRobinson/status/1324834714004455424

Regardless of the truth, we're being gaslit about the hardest we've ever been.

>>7655

>>7726

I laughed harder at this than I should've. Then I appreciated the fact that I did.

Thank you, anon. Thank you.

>>7729