Anonymous ID: 27aaa1 [REQUEST] Guillaume Faye: Truths and Tributes Jan. 29, 2021, 10:54 p.m. No.13878   🗄️.is đź”—kun

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Guillaume-Faye-Tributes-Pierre-Krebs-ebook/dp/B08PMYXZTM/

>Guillaume Faye was a visionary and a prophet. Like the damned poets for which romantic France is famous, he saw what others refused to see, and he named what others pretended did not even exist.

 

>He was certainly no saint and like a true artist liked to imbibe and paint imposing mental images of the future with a brushstroke unmistakably his own. His character was consistently rebellious in the service of a higher ideal: the defense of his race and culture against the onslaught of self-imposed ethnomasochism, forced multiculturalism and aggressive Islamization.

 

>In this book, important personages from the Right pay tribute to Faye's outstanding career as a speaker, writer and pro-European activist. With all its ups and downs and in its lyrical grandeur, Faye's life truly inspires all of us who strive to make a difference in our motherland - Eurosiberia. Faye was an awakener, who paved the way on which we must march to final victory and liberation.

Anonymous ID: 27aaa1 [REQUEST] Human Sin or Social Sin: Evolutionary Psychology, Plato and the Christian Logic of Sociolo Feb. 12, 2021, 10:41 p.m. No.13929   🗄️.is đź”—kun

https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B01GQSN56A/

>Is the West today a unified or diverse culture? The orthodox position is that we should be strictly unified around the ideal of diversity. The idealistic vision is that we achieve redemption by angrily rejecting our immoral, fallen history, and lovingly embrace the sunny future of diversity. Heaven is Nature and the perfectly loving and diverse future; Hell is the disdainful and divisive past. Today, ethical and scientific facts that imply hellish disdain, and not love, are experienced as domineering or a “hegemonic discourse” and are worthy of attack: “Subvert the Dominant Paradigm!”—Walter Burkert, the eminent historian of religion said of this model, “Many thanks for the startlingly insights.”

 

>The nineteenth century was unified by exalting high culture and disliking nature and diversity. We today have inverted this; we are unified by disdain for high culture, and love for nature and diversity: so joyful, altruistic feelings exist between those in the group who embrace the new unity—but they direct antagonism toward outsiders. Today’s new unity, as described in Human Sin or Social Sin, inspired evolutionary psychologists to reconsider the theory of group selection for altruism.