>>12519

>writings from Aleksander Dugin

http://libgen.rs/book/index.php?md5=3B6048CBD986B5EC26F068264BEF05D4

>Putin vs Putin: Vladimir Putin Viewed from the Right

http://libgen.rs/book/index.php?md5=CD9A5388EF81662A415E02400B16E832

>Ethnosociology: The Foundations

http://libgen.rs/book/index.php?md5=B6F4E2F6B66F65C21F9E2B7E7007B848

>Political Platonism: The Philosophy of Politics

https://archive.org/details/adventuresdiscov00coon

>Adventures and Discoveries: The Autobiography of Carleton S. Coon

https://archive.org/details/racialadaptation0000coon

>Racial Adaptations

https://archive.org/details/livingracesofman00coon

>The Living Races of Man

https://archive.org/details/isbn_9781125153611

>The Hunting Peoples

https://archive.org/details/sevencavesarchae00coon/

>The Seven Caves: Archaeological Explorations in the Middle East

https://archive.org/details/caravanstoryofmi00coon/

>Caravan: The Story of the Middle East

This was requested awhile back:

http://libgen.rs/book/index.php?md5=86958D15AC2035D1E1A3DD817D82D227

>When wish replaces thought: why so much of what you believe is false

https://archive.org/details/inevitabilityofp00gold

>Goldberg reviews literature, gathering evidence from expert witnesses (both primary and secondary sources) to demonstrate that each of three distinct patterns of recognised human social behaviour (institutions) has been observed in every known society. He proposes that these three universal institutions, attested as they are across independent cultures, suggest a simple psychophysiological cause, since physiology remains constant, as do the institutions, even across variable cultures—a universal phenomenon suggests a universal explanation.

>The institutions Goldberg examines and claims to be universal among all known societies are patriarchy (men dominating higher hierarchical positions), male attainment (activities which provide higher status are related to male physiology) and male dominance (cultural expectation of male leadership and control). The hypothetical psychophysiological phenomenon he proposes to explain them, he denotes by the expression differentiation of dominance tendency. He explains this refers to dominance behaviour being more easily elicited from men on average than from women on average. In other words, he theorises a biologically mediated difference in preferences.

>Goldberg next provides expert witnesses from several disciplines regarding correlations between behaviour and the hormone testosterone, which are known to be causative in several cases, including dominance preference. He concludes with the hypothesis that testosterone is a necessary (but not sufficient) condition for the development of the institutions he examined. In other words, without testosterone, the institutions would not develop—it must be part (but not all) of an explanation for their universality.

>Finally, Goldberg proposes that if patriarchy is indeed biologically based, it will prove to be inevitable; unless a society is willing to intervene biologically on the male physiology.

>>12581

>share a book of the kabbalah.

Do you mean the Zohar? Hard to tell, as your English is barely comprehensible.

http://libgen.rs/book/index.php?md5=2B6DB36F911F7831D7F4C73F3B1A6026

>Original Aramaic & Hebrew translation

http://libgen.rs/book/index.php?md5=43B2223F01B09E4BB8C3A6BB24107E5D

>English translation

https://archive.org/details/questionofintell00seli

>Why do some people have higher IQs than others? Why do some groups score higher average than others? Why do some countries seem to have higher average than others? Are the tests culturally biased? Are the tests worthwhile at all, or should they be abolished? These are all highly charged questions, and these days we often get extremely emotional about them. To dispel the confusion, Daniel Seligman offers us this bracing defense of IQ testing. Many Americans, however, may be troubled by this book's controversial and unavoidable message: that people are in fact born with unequal mental abilities. Carefully researched and powerfully argued, A Question of Intelligence reports that in weighing nature vs. nurture, it is mostly nature that accounts for differences in intelligence. What we inherit translates later into career and financial successes - and inequalities. And since America is in critical respects a meritocracy, IQ scores explain a lot about why some people gravitate to the top, while others go through life with limited opportunities. Threading his way through a cluster of quarrels about IQ, Seligman tells us why most experts (psychologists, educators, researchers) believe the tests do measure "intelligence" and are not culturally biased. In the midst of a social and political minefield, he addresses the sensitive but inescapable subject of ethnic and national differences in IQ and outlines the connection between IQ levels and economic achievement. He proposes that banning the tests will work against the interests of school children: we must still make decisions about our kids - which ones need remedial reading courses, for example, and which ones qualify for advanced programs - and those decisions will be better if informed by IQ testing. Seligman even takes an IQ test himself along the way, and sends back a lively account of the experience. The realities of the entire IQ controversy have almost always been at odds with the media's reports. Now A Question of Intelligence sets the record straight, putting this fiery debate to the test in crystal-clear, comprehensible terms. It is a bold and crucial book for every American who wants to understand what is at stake - and why intelligence matters.