I guess this chart is a good starting point, but ultimately we just have to accept the teleological nature of constructing a book chart. There is a place we want the consumer to go, so I guess presenting multiple open ends is the best way of "counteracting" this. It depends on how parsimonious and practical we want to be, ultimately I believe we should place a heavy emphasis on accepting cognitive dissonance (i.e. being against the highly autistic world-of-forms of lolbergism) and genetics (which would, ironically, place emphasis on being agrarian and reactionary traditionalists as opposed to modern statists).
We should start with what man is and how to keep his race pure and healthy.
>Mass immigration and multiculturalism vs the human need for racial separation
a Jared Taylor book would cover this pretty quickly
>Feminism, LGBT and the destruction of sex vs traditional family values
I don't know a book offhand but this is on a "higher level", here you need to apply what you learned reading about genetics and the fertility rates of different ideological groups to infer and correctly understand that these anti-natural doctrines filter out because they can't successfully reproduce.
>The global finance system and banking families vs a sustainable economic system
I'm not a big economist, I understand enough to know that jewish wealth extraction via man-in-the-middle central banking is bad. This should be split into theory and then naming names. All central banking is dubious.
>Post-modern art and music, and money laundering vs traditional arts and aesthetics
I believe the appeal to aesthetics should come after the "waking up" to how gross the modern world is. Aesthetics are the link into the subconscious to which we have to appeal in order to enlighten the reader. We consider things beautiful based on what we "know" them to be ideally, genetically speaking.
> Jews, communism, frankfurt school and colleges vs a proper home-school education
This is another multilevel problem, first we must introduce the knowledge on jews, second we must introduce why raising and educating children at home makes them very proof to manipulation, jewish and non-jewish.
>Xenoestrogens, water contamination and psychiatry vs home cooking skills
This can fit on one of the lower tiers but shouldn't be over represented, perhaps this is even an offshoot in its own right. Presenting that modern food is bad is in our interests, but ultimately this is part of making this political self-reeducation whole.
>Military /k/ stuff, some /tech/ material, some /co/ and /art/ just to be safe
Of course.
Mein Kampf is roughly halfway to where I see the end goal of this being.
>Really, how comprehensive do you want this to be?
It should mimic 4 years of education that would've been given to an SS officer to make him a functional middle-tier politician/bureaucrat. This is IQ120+ stuff.