Anonymous ID: da3ca4 Sept. 10, 2018, 1:08 a.m. No.10093   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0103

>>10052

I might, we'll see. Whatever I'm in the mood for. It's definitely going in the queue at least.

 

Anyway, I finished "Hitler's Second Book". He was an articulate man - sometimes hard to decipher, not because of vagueness, but because of exactness. I'll be listening back to this recording to better my own understanding, but I did get value out of it my first time through. It's an excellent read. I hope you guys enjoy hearing it.

Anonymous ID: da3ca4 Sept. 14, 2018, 4:01 a.m. No.10135   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0136

>>10134

Thank you. Are there any books you think need an audio version? My queue is quite short right now. After I finish Into the Darkness, which shouldn't take long, I might just focus on finishing up my second run through "Hitlers War", and then maybe get started on "Churchill's War".

Anonymous ID: da3ca4 Sept. 14, 2018, 5:23 a.m. No.10141   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0145 >>0205

>>10136

>200 Years Together

>pronunciations

Yes, that's one I've been meaning to read, but you're right, the slav-speak is difficult. I'll have to do some prep.

>Culture of Critique

I almost started that one a while back. It definitely needs to be accessed more easily. It's a good idea to get these high profile books converted to audio, because more people are likely to listen to them simply because of their fame/notoriety. I think books like this are the best use of my time even though there's other stuff I'd like to read.

 

The main 4 or 5 David Irving works, "Culture of Critique", "200 Years Together", anything written by Hitler. I think a lot of folks, who will never sit down to read, fantasize about these books being part of their repertoire of knowledge. Anything else you guys can think of that fall into this category of "Books we know people already want to read, but probably won't", be sure to list them here and I'll read them as time allows.

Anonymous ID: da3ca4 Sept. 14, 2018, 2:15 p.m. No.10148   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Do you mean evolutionary psychology when you say to "pseudo-science"? I haven't read the book, but I seem to recall that being a factor in his analysis.