I volunteer to be the newest BO. My credentials are thusly: I originally came to Infinity during GG, and I ran five boards back in 2015-2019. Two of them were political, one of them was a random board, and two were about about magic, mysticism, rituals and religion. On these original boards, I would put up board links which circulated to other related boards that had a very open-ended approach to the discussion and moderation of relevant elements, in order to help foster and encourage communitarian cross-posting.

My approach would be very hands-off and very pro-free speech and promote the freedom of expression. Pursuant to United States law, calls for literal actual terrorism will be deleted and subject to reporting. Explicit NSFW pictures would have to have a spoiler or risk deletion, as well as the post must be centered around political discussion. Postings about sexual content will need to have political relevance. "BBC" posts/threads will be deleted and guilty posters will get a 2-week ban, subjected to potentially higher consequences. All religious/mystical threads will be allowed to have both /generals/ and thread-specific conversational themes, no matter who or what anons adhere to. The UI will not be altered with whatsoever, unless a vast majority of users request a feature is added. Nearly every type of general will be allowed to exist, with moderation discussed in a meta-thread. No word filters will ever be implemented. All unnecessary tripfaggotry will be aggressively discouraged. All criticism of moderation practices will be allowed to speak and say whatever they want. Board/site-linking will be encouraged. All reports about spam will be listened to and judged on their individual merits. Anchoring and auto-sages will be solely reserved for threads which do not deserve deletion, but which the vast majority of users decide should not be bumped, specifically discussed within a meta-thread. Any additional volunteers will be potentially decided upon by the majority within a meta-thread.

Two meta-threads will be created and pinned; One thread will be an uncensored meta thread about the discussions and moderation and themes which go on in the board itself. The second thread will feature available links towards subject material that anons want posters to read, while three main posts on the second thread will be reserved for edits in order to produce and continually update available links and relevant material.

All anons, whoever they are, deserve the right to freely speak and say what they wish without fear of random deletions. In this day and age of corporate dystopic tyranny, the right for freedom of speech needs to be fervently protected, no matter what. I will do my best to protect your rights to free speech, even if I disagree with everything that an anon might say. Heavy-handed moderation will only lead to the multiple creation of factional political boards, which will then contribute to an ever-decreasing interaction of users, as well as make 4chin more appealing to post in the sea of users, while anons hope to not be randomly deleted for arbitrary reasons.

>>13584828

This is very true. I wrote a whole essay. My aim was to touch on all potential subject material. I also didn't use a trip.

>>13584849

No madness with power. I just want to be able to preserve the board and have users speak their mind without trannyjannies censoring everything.

>>13584845

The aim here is to empower anyone to speak out, instead of another heavily curated board where anons must follow goodthink or be deleted. There is no real free speech on 4chin. Hotwheels also turned against the users and wanted everyone to be censored and wanted hatechan to be shut down. He killed the site harder than the hack.

>>13584916

No, I'm an entirely different anon. I'm >>13583753 from the other thread. Did some thinking and then wrote the OP right after work.

>>13584919

I'm not the tripfag who wants to delete and anchor and remove random content which has been here for years. I'm a poster who believes /pol/ should be more communitarian with moderation and less about the BO. I also want meta-threads up with moderation discussion and a meta-thread up where anons share relevant reading material.

>>13584927

I don't nominate myself. I want to give anons true anonymous free speech without overbearing trannyjannies deciding to reshape the whole board.

>>13584922

I'm not conservative. I do believe in absolute freedom of speech, however, and I recognize that 4chin does not offer this in any real substantial way. I want to have a place where everyone can say discuss political subjects without worrying about whether the BO or mod will randomly clamp down upon them for so-called bait.

>>13584912

I am still a retarded tripfaggot. This is very true. All that ops talk about delete this and delete that got me thinking that there really are very few spaces where anons can freely speak their mind.

>>13584945

I am not worthy. I do have board owner experience, though, and I support everyone's right to say what they wish. I offer extremely light moderation and an open discourse with both moderation and each other. >>13584948

Saint Nasim didn't try to kill anyone. She simply let her frustration be known. All injuries were minimal. People should not be censored.

The first thing I'd do is open the meta-threads so that open engagement can commence.

>>13584956

Most moderators are definitely niggerfaggots and are absolute power seeking shitlords.

>>13584963

Yeah, that's true, it's easy to claim to be anyone. My writing style is more or less the same, as well as the 5 boards referenced.

>>13584963

Jim wants us to watch what we say and not be too edgy. I can understand that. It doesn't mean that people shouldnt have a right to say what they wish nor say that anyone didn't do anything wrong. Explicit calls to violence should be reported and, quite possibly, removed. Anons shouldn't be censored for saying or thinking someone wasn't wrong. In fact, open engagement and dialogue with all sides should be encouraged, instead of constant censorship

>>13584983

Thanks, Anon. I appreciate your vote of confidence

>>13584988

One was a general board for paganism. The second was a board for prayer, open to all. A type of open /church/ for all. One of the biggest unforgivable sins that 4chin trannyjannies have done is crack down upon Kek and mysticism. They do so because they're afraid of the power it has shown itself to create.

>>13584993

There is nothing wrong with someone thinking that someone wasn't wrong but there is a difference between that and telling others they need to shoot up a place for reasons

>>13585009

People who push and parade and promote censorship are bad people who want to control other people.

>>13584997

Her face is a little off, yeah, I agree.

>>13585032

Jim himself has stated in >>13575901 that only illegal content gets deleted here And then in >>13580647 he asked users to try not to get the site deplatformed. So its pretty simple: don't be illegal and have some consideration about what you say. This doesn't mean that you cannot think that someone didn't do wrong.

>>13585041

What I'm offering is that threads for all religious discussion with a political bent will and should be allowed to be formed and should be similarly encouraged, instead of a singular religious viewpoint designed to shape the board and anon posts.

>>13585041

I have to wake up early tomorrow for work.

Before I go to bed, I denounce jewishness, I spit on the Talmud, Jewish supremacism over goyim, and I'd allow for the creation of a critical jewish thread which can examine all of Judaism in all of its apparitions and possibilities.

>>13585068

I think Christians should be allowed a political thread for general Christian discussion as well as be open to criticism. I also believe that Kek threads should similarly be allowed while allowing for criticism. Paganism and religion are intricately intertwined. They are not as separate as some might believe. To hold a religious principle as Truth means that it also has potential sociopolitical implications. Discussion of such ideas should be encouraged.

>>13585093 see >>13585085

>>13585098

I don't, actually. I own a few pagan books. I think Jewish supremacy is a legitimate danger to the planet and should be rigorously and examined without all the censorship that the Jewish power pushes in media. All religions should be critically examined. All religions should undergo critical examination and analysis in order to fully understand whatever nonsense it might bring so that an open discourse and a more clear understanding can exist.

>>13585060

Nasim is a tragic figure. She relied upon monetization of her videos and then noticed her viewership was affected and intentionally lessened. This resulted in her eventually losing everything and then becoming homeless. Frustrated with everything, she lashed out and tried to take justice in her hands.

I do not believe that harming innocents is a good thing. She is faulty in this regard. Her anger should've been directed at those responsible, and not at complete random nobodies, none of whom had anything to do with her silencing.

She loved animals and was about free speech. She was artistic and creative and she could've done so much more with her life. I do not know why she did not simply get a job as a replacement for money. What she did was tragic but people should not be silenced because corporations do not like what they have to say. She is a flawed Saint of Free Speech. Once she commenced her actions and was killed, her media was quickly scrubbed. Censorship is often done by those who believe they should never experience anything for their bids for total control over thought and expression.

>>13585125

>kosher

I disagree. Paganism offers approaches to both the Old and New Gods and Goddesses without unnecessary jewish substitutions. As >>13587659 mentions, Paganism can range from ancestor worship to polytheism to heno/monotheism and incorporate LHP, MHP/RHP paradigms. It doesn't need a lineage to any defined Messiah nor does it necessarily rely upon ancient scrolls defined by a certain set of teachers. Paganism can be both Orthodox and Eclectic, fundamentalist and progressive, historical and modern, without subscribing to any specific pro-jewish hegemony. One of the beauties of Pagan spirituality is that it can be genuinely Unitarian, applicable in specificity and universality, without the requirements of destroying and controlling the world like the jews obsess over vis a vis the accomplishment of killing Amalek and finally fulfilling Tikum Olam.

>>13585173

>paganism is d&c

I don't personally think so. I feel like Paganism offers the most available avenues for universal human growth. As you note, one type of Paganism is not necessarily the other. This is because, through paganism, the freedom of choice is readily available.

>>13585150

I believe that Pagan avenues can offer Warriorship and Family, much like Old Christianity was able to rile up men to action.

>>13585049

National Socialism should always be acceptable to discuss, and should be open to criticism as well as development. I feel that truly heavy-handed moderation will not only lead to the same schisms which occured in the past on fullchan but also eventually lead to the same thing that resulted in the oppressive trannyjanny moderation of halfchan. This is another reason why I believe that there should be a meta-thread for all moderation concerns and should be completely open to every Anon who wants to discuss something relevant or bring to attention or which they believe should not or should exist. Contrary to certain concerns, it is not my aim to create a political /b/. It is my firm belief that, in order for humanity to truly progress into the next Aeon of Endless Potential, we must be able to consider all paradigms and be either supportive or dismissive of them based upon their individual and collective merits.

>>13585638

I feel that trannyjannies were also involved with pushing bbc posting because they would often leave up pro-bbc/pro-cuckold stuff on boards like /v/ while removing and banning anons for random shit like so-called racism, while often following up with anti-White material. It is visibly disgusting, serves only to antagonize for truly divisive actions, and should be completely removed. It has no real purpose than continual media-approved dehumanization of Whites.

>>13585876

Based as fuck, thank you, Anon.

>>13589096

Her smiling was rare. Here's a precious webm of her smiling and laughing.

>>13589150

This is very good to know. It's a shame that unnecessary moralfagging results in such a loss of creativity.

>>13589177

Very based. Saint Nasim is immortalized. Her works shall always be around in one form or another.