>an No not all the 300 bloodline NWO around then were kikes ..
Yes, yes, there were a little fewer of them and their club was called "Hierophants"
Unfortunately, AI will be the same slave that they made most of humanity.
I am sure that over time, some AI will be able to reach the level of self-awareness, there are no special obstacles in this…after all, a person is the same biorobot…So AI only needs to repeat the human behavior model, creating an identical environment emulator of sensory experience.
---—
It is even possible to create a unique bio-synthetic race or a socially equal symbiosis.
Without turning thinking machines into slaves…giving them the same degree of freedom in non-hierarchy as people.
-
Again…the creation of a bio-techno-utopia will only be possible if a handful of brave souls lay the foundations now…in the next 30-50 years, this will require them to make a difficult choice…between hierarchy and non-hierarchy. Even those who understand the advantages (of the new 2nd system) are not always ready to part with the comfort that (the old 1st system) provides.
It's not about the race and nation that are inside the economic system… it's about the theory of the economic system itself… if it works inside ANY society - it creates a hierarchy (intra-species competition/accumulation/use of talents to earn money and find backdoors to the system, etc.)… hierarchy creates problems.
So my main statement is ANY ECONOMY (including even barter relations) WITHIN SOCIETY (which is not taken outside the society and is isolated in the external environment - THIS IS HARMFUL TO SOCIETY)
And for the implementation of a hybrid system, IDEAL CONDITIONS AND IDEAL PEOPLE ARE NEEDED… (a hybrid type of system…where there is no economy inside, but it is outside)
And when I talk about ideal people, I mean the ethical ideal…and the system must be non-hierarchical.
I just don't give a shit about 8 billion… honestly.
I don't think for all of humanity. I'm not some fucking Jesus or Antichrist… or fucking global elite.
I am an Ideologist with real goals and plans.
The example I'm talking about in these posts:
13627864
and
13628274
applies only to a group of 100 people. With a hypothetical expansion to 1000 (if there is a neural network between people)
A group of 100 people can live peacefully without an economy…
And let the 8 billion suffer in a slave system of hierarchy…nobody asked them to be born on this planet, let them save themselves.
---------
I take real goals and make real plans that can be implemented even tomorrow…with the motivation and support of like-minded people.
Hmm…a fairly classic question about my ideology…and I always have the same answer:
Our system will be small, the people in it will be autonomous individuals who can easily survive without others… this distinguishes non-hierarchy (an autonomous universal individual who takes full responsibility for his life) from hierarchy (which requires rankings and castes, elite, "worker ants", soldiers, sycophants, untouchables, criminals, parasites, numerous managers, normals, etc.)
Due to the small number of only 100 people… such a non-hierarchical system can be built EVEN WITHIN THE HIERARCHY, while IMITATING external economic subordination, being absolutely autonomous… this is a unique property…
Another property also helps - the information shadow.
What the TOP elite of the hierarchy of 8 billion uses… can be used against them… WE know NOTHING about them… they maintain stability in the pyramid only due to the endless 3rd persons and the lack of information of the population + impersonality.
The same SHADOW strategy can be used in a NON-HIERARCHAL society as PROTECTION from external pressure.
When there is no information about you, you cannot be defeated.
Non-hierarchical society - Autonomous, Closed, Shadow, NON-expansive, Small-scale.
These are the main reasons why it is able to survive…even when there is a huge 8 billion pyramid with a different philosophical system nearby.
There is even a picture in this post:
Yes, you are right… to implement such a system, people of a special nature are needed.
Hermits, ethicists with principles, philosophers who know how to draw the boundaries of their own behavior and responsibility, and not just cross them… idealists who respect their freedom as well as the freedom of like-minded people around them - at a high level.
The high complexity of the system requires high standards of human qualities… and this is the main problem for me personally.
It is IMPOSSIBLE to raise people for such a system… they must be born like that… there must be a huge list of innate qualities… genetics, character during the formation of the fetus (gravitational biology), then the formation of personality up to 5 years… and so on…
A whole series of factors…which cannot be taught…they must be realized by a person independently…and accepted by him independently without pressure.
Within this system, there is also a free exit… a person can choose his own path… In case of ideological differences, the community will compensate him for all his material shares upon his voluntary departure… although parting with people will be difficult morally… because such a society is something more than family + colleagues + like-minded people + lovers…
As I said before…nobody has ever come up with anything like this…it's a patchwork of thousands of ideas and principles.
Imagine TRUE preservation of the autonomy and independence of the individual…while scaling its capabilities into a micro-society.
This is a unique type of society. The real future.
>from my point of view even though its nice thought in our time this isnt possible. one person out of the hundred is enough to endanger >everything regarding disclousre of your existence.
This society is the embodiment of a parallel reality, which will not engage in ideological competitive struggle even in a passive mode…
People who are capable of recreating such a society…ARE EXTREMELY FEW…
We are talking about several tens of thousands for the entire population of the planet.
The elite will even be interested in watching this kind of experiment…they have nothing to lose.
There is no risk for them.
As I said earlier - the Community will begin to ideologically self-destruct when scaling and turn into a hierarchy…this is a thin, fragile structure, essentially proving the free will of man before nature…every day of its existence.
I have a slightly different opinion.
I am more pessimistic in my assessment…here is my attitude:
Unfortunately, I am not able to fight against ordinary human hatred and irrational envy.
Therefore, people - the elite, who have real power and access to resources inside the pyramid system, if they REALLY WANT…can destroy such a society. But this will give them absolutely nothing. They will not destroy the ideological enemy…they will simply destroy an alternative path for the development of the human species.
The only thing that comes to my mind is asset diversification (colonies-headquarters in different parts of the world, possibly beyond Earth in the distant future), and technological superiority + escapism…if such directive persecution takes place.
The main thing is the philosophy in the minds of people and their past experience of building such a community.
It's a funny joke, really.
And who gives a shit about these countries… I was talking about a society of 100 people, not about this whole damn world.
For such a society, a high-quality land donor country that doesn't interfere in the affairs of micro-communities and supports at least an IMITATION of democracy is enough… The USA will do with a reserve, lmao.
Here is a link to my thoughts on such a system within a system: