Anonymous ID: 32bb18 Oct. 10, 2021, 9:49 a.m. No.100113   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0114 >>0118 >>0120

wow, new type of fuckery.

Now they combine notables of different threads, which are in fact ignored by me.

 

See

>>>/qresearch/>>14758611

 

>>14757675 QClock October 9, 2021 Look up every now and then >>14755109 pb, >>14755110 pb, >>14755131 pb, >>14755111 pb, >>14755120 pb Red Iowa Sky in October, hivemind alive tonight

 

That's 2 different notables from 2 different threads, wtf.

Anonymous ID: 32bb18 Oct. 10, 2021, 10:18 a.m. No.100125   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0129

>>100118

Ahhh, that is a problem, because I mark all posts as notable that are mentioned on one line, and right now I'm checking if they are all from the same thread.

Will have to think this over.

 

In this case it's worse because it's really 2 different notable lists and the latter ones were already mentioned in a thread before that.

Anonymous ID: 32bb18 Oct. 10, 2021, 10:23 a.m. No.100129   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0131

>>100125

>>100126

What's a problem is this:

 

[post from lb] [post from bread before lb] this is a notable

 

What's okay is:

[post from lb] this is a notable

[post from bread before lb] this is a notable

 

Maybe I will check in such a case if the other posts were already marked as notable and then ignore these.

Anonymous ID: 32bb18 Oct. 10, 2021, 10:30 a.m. No.100132   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0135

>>100130

Yes, that's why I do it.

Once notable'd and it can get removed.

The only way would be if I step in, and I would only step in if someone created a bread that mentioned all posts as notables or some other nonsense. I never had to do that.

 

As I said, new notables can get added.

I myself never remove anything, even when it's factual bullshit, because I'm first of all against censorship. You can't stop fuckery using censorship anyways also who am I pretending to know what's a fact and what not. I'm not facebook kek.