Vaccine trial whistle blower says the vax trials didn't show what Pfizer said it did
UK Dr John Campbell
https://youtu.be/THv33zWykJc
NEJM article showing Pfizer vax was safe - that paper that NOT been retracted at this point.
Pfizer’s pivotal covid-19 vaccine trial,
raise questions about data integrity and regulatory oversight
This was the original paper
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056...
Autumn 2020
Pfizer’s chairman and chief executive, Albert Bourla: "As I’ve said before, we are operating at the speed of science"
Ventavia Research Group
https://www.ventaviaresearch.com
Researchers were testing Pfizer’s vaccine at several sites in Texas
As a regional director, Brook Jackson has told The BMJ that the company
-
falsified data
-
unblinded patients
-
employed inadequately trained vaccinators
-
was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial
-
Staff who conducted quality control checks were overwhelmed by the volume of problems they were finding.
US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were informed about this, did that act on it?
Ventavia fired Miss Jackson for reporting this to the FDA later the same day.
The BMJ (Brit Med Journal) has been provided with dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails.
She repeatedly informed her superiors about
-
poor laboratory management
-
patient safety concerns
-
data integrity issues
-
that drug assignment confirmation printouts were being left in participants’ charts, accessible to blinded personnel (later corrected)
-
company wasn’t able to quantify the types and number of errors they were finding when examining the trial paperwork for quality control
-
ICON, the contract research organisation:
ICON then highlighted over 100 outstanding queries older than three days
https://www.iconplc.com/services/clin...
Concerns raised in BMJ article:
-
Participants placed in a hallway after injection and not being monitored by clinical staff
-
Lack of timely follow-up of patients who experienced adverse events
-
Protocol deviations not being reported
-
Vaccines not being stored at proper temperatures
-
Mislabelled laboratory specimens
-
Targeting of Ventavia staff for reporting these types of problems.
-
FDA advisory committee meeting held on 10 December 2020
-
Problems at Ventavia not mentioned
The next day the FDA issued the emergency use authorisation of the vaccine
Results:
-
In August this year, after full FDA approval of Pfizer’s vaccine
-
FDA published that 9 of the trials 153 sites were inspected (so 144 were NOT inspected)
-
FDA, full trial swabs were not taken from 477 people with suspected cases of symptomatic covid-19 (what group were they in - experimental or placebo?)
-
Other employees’ accounts - agreed with Miss Jackson, they feared reprisal if they spoke out. Two former Ventavia employees spoke to The BMJ anonymously for fear of reprisal and loss of job prospects in the tightly knit research community. Comments:
-
I don’t think it was good clean data
-
It’s a crazy mess
Pfizer has hired Ventavia as a research subcontractor on four other vaccine clinical trials. They looked at
This is the video that amazing polly looked at here - she does NOT like Dr. John Campbell extremely neutral attitude - all pb
>>107275, >>107276, >>107282 Amazing Polly: Shocking Cover-Up of Severe Vaccine Reactions & Fraudulent Clinical Trials
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Szi5AcqpqEhz/