Anonymous ID: 58ff16 Jan. 16, 2022, 9:02 p.m. No.121494   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1501

Extended DOJ/Comey decode, all pb: >>115813, >>116087, >>117057, >>118140, >>118638, >>119352, >>120196

 

This anon is replying to my last post re Comey being a white hat and perhaps Q:

>>120198 pb

>Interesting idea. Myself would believe that the Earth is flat (its not) before considering any fucking Fed a whitehat.

 

I think this anon does not mean this literally, but I want to briefly take it literally as a thought experiment.

Like many anons, I find it useful to contemplate seeming crazy ideas (and we see many of them).

I think there is a refutation of the flat earth theory that is difficult to counter.

Suppose that the Earth is really a disk, and the "South Pole" is not a point, but rather an ice wall on the circumference.

(That is what the flat Earth proponents/shills seem to say.)

Then flight times in the Southern hemisphere would be far longer than they are.

Not many people travel to inner Anatarctica, so maybe the elites could keep secret what is there.

And maybe NASA produces fake photos of the Earth, and only a few know, and so on.

But many, many people take flights in the Southern hemisphere (Novak Djokovic, for instance).

Are they are all "in on" the conspiracy?

That doesn't seem very likely, and I don't think the flat earthers address this.

So I don't place much stock in that theory, but I do think it is useful to think about things like that.

 

Here is my question about Comey though: is there any similar "easy" proof that he is not a white hat?

For instance, if he killed an innocent person, then he is not a white hat.

I think I have provided a good deal of positive evidence that he is a white hat, and I have a way to explain, in principle, most of the counter-evidence.

In short, his participation in Russiagate was for the purpose of directing the black hats into a debacle (and gathering evidence on them).

(And of course the biggest chunk of positive evidence accrues around the fact that he screwed Hillary in 2016.)

But I would totally agree that there could exist knockdown evidence against my interpretation.

It is just that I haven't seen it or thought of it.

 

Anyway, my new graphic here is another one that was unplanned, and was spurred by this anon replying with some notes on yet another Comey post:

>>120670 pb

https://twitter.com/Comey/status/1481087771339112454

 

Events seem to be moving fast, so I figured I should put this together and post.

I do not profess to know what the 11.3 marker ultimately means.

I will keep working to develop these ideas and appreciate critical feedback.