Anonymous ID: 5d4010 Jan. 15, 2022, 11:32 p.m. No.121292   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1295 >>1296 >>1501

Hello QRB, UK bread visiting with a fun half-dig. Am not sure whether I shared this dig with you or not. We’ve dug up and down and sideways upside down and have some odds and ends leftovers hanging about. Here’s another of those half-spun digs but it’s fun to share.

 

I always thot that anon’s speculation in Q post 2800 that the value targets might have arrived at the Embankment by boat was wild speculation, thinking “Oh, come on,” but there remains the fact Q linked to that anon and a couple of others.

With that in mind, I’s like to share this vidcap from a Ytube vid was an accidental find by UK anons for a building lights match with the LISAMI6 building called the MILLBANK BLDG. it was the first such match found by the UK anons.

It presented a conundrum, being found in a vid by a photographer whose Ytube vid was stated to contain photos from a photography event called ‘Photo 24 London’ which according to the photog took place in June 2014. However, UK anons determined the hoarding on that particular tower could not have occurred in June 2014, and by that evidence, could only have occurred between NOV ‘13 and MAR ‘14. By April 2014 the hoarding on the tower of Westminster would be gone. So we figured that the photog had by mistake included that pic in the video by mistake. It would only be later that an anon would find the sunset Getty images from Christmas Day 2013 which would be a match for the building lights seen in LISAMI6. But those Getty images would also be a compelling match for this private photo. We dubbed it 24LONDON.

 

The photo, if taken during the time window of LISAMI6, would show an ‘over the side’ image of TATTERSHALL CASTLE which could have been taken the same night as LISAMI6.

The pic appears to show a vessel alongside TATTS and another dark vessel that has hauled up to the riverside. It is a timelapse photo which appears to show the boat wakes of the two vessels. Noteworthy, is that the boat wakes come from down river toward the sea. We estimate, by looking at the rotation seen on LONDON EYE, that the film exposure was 5 minutes. Here’s why: One revolution of LONDON EYE takes 30 minutes. Look at how far LONDON EYE has moved. It appears LE has moved 1/6th of its circumference.

Do anons recall Q post 2800?

Posting it below:

2800

Feb 18, 2019 4:34:26 PM EST

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI

Feb 18, 2019 4:30:37 PM EST

Anonymous

Feb 18, 2019 4:28:59 PM EST

Anonymous

 

ClipboardImage.png

 

Feb 18, 2019 4:28:43 PM EST

Anonymous

>>5248705

Is the boat dock relevant? Did the people in the photo arrive via boat? I'd assume that's preferable as most points of entry will have lots of security and cameras.

 

I just checked googlemaps (i konw nothing of UK geography) and it looks like yes: you could take a boat from France (or really anywhere on the atlantic) and then mosey on over to the Corinthian. I wonder if the traffic cam is new and nobody knew about it?

 

Also in the photo of "LP" (hard to see, we assert, not known) it looks like they're walking away from the boat dock. Not conclusive that they came from there, but does hint towards that.

Feb 18, 2019 4:26:46 PM EST

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI

 

CH3.PNG

 

>>5248631

 

ClipboardImage.png

 

>>5248788

>>5248780

>>5248728

 

Found the camera

>>5248831

(END OF Q POST)

 

Video with pic showing MILLBANK match with LISAMI6. See 1min:01sec

 

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eDzV7cMRvHM

 

A POST-NOTE: I remember when we were discussing this ‘over the side’ view of TATTS and daring to ask, what if it showed boat activity alongside and near TATTS’ portside on that same night as the Embankment pics. All of a sudden from nowhere we had a double-team of derision shills throwing up some profanity-laced posts in opposition to even the thought.

Anonymous ID: 5d4010 Jan. 16, 2022, 2:40 a.m. No.121297   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>121295

>If you come across him, would you ask him to drop by? Would like to chat. Can also be reached at F4AL@protonmail.com.

>Blessings.

You might’ve read my mind. (I think. Maybe.) It was after he got banned by OSS, I left a note for Boat once on another site that he should give you a ring about baking. Boat is a salt o’ the earth good anon.

Struck up a frenship with him diggin on Alamitos Bay -“1st and 10 on the 40” dig. Drug him over to UK where he became our baker as we had no regular baker back then. I will pass the message to contact you. But until then, you might try Midnight Riders - unless you are being discreet about contacting him. I won’t mention anything there either. Will just tell him to give us a ring first.

Anonymous ID: 5d4010 Jan. 16, 2022, 4:23 a.m. No.121298   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1304 >>1328 >>1501

>>121295

Anon, if it was you who asked for a Statement of purpose and Summary of the UK/London pics digs, I will talk with my fellow anon if he will write that up for you. I must agree, it is necessary to let anons know why the dig(s) were necessary. In short, the digs were necessary for you fellow anons. You are not alone anon. We knew anons were not understanding that there was another facet to all of the London digs. Another time.

Another treason. Related.

Anonymous ID: 5d4010 Jan. 16, 2022, 5:44 a.m. No.121304   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1501

>>121298

>the dig(s) were necessary. In short, the digs were necessary for you fellow anons. You are not alone anon. We knew anons were not understanding that there was another facet to all of the London digs. Another time.

Another treason. Related.

The super duper short reason for why? Once we saw that Piccadilly Circus (pics) did not jibe with a 2015 narrative, we had to know why. Was it only for the Piccadilly pics? Kept pulling that thread. What if some might try to cry ‘larp” and say the pics are not even from 2015 to match the Spygate story. Needed to look moar. Not easy work some of them. But each series was eventually dated to Christmas 2013. That one date makes me comfy. It means that some larper didn’t stupidly post a couple of pics from 2013 by mistake when the larp story is supposed to be from 2015. Therefore, if all the pics are from 2013 it’s much less likely some larper chose the wrong date for multiple series of pictures. So, no coincidence. So, he intended to post those 2013 pics to show us something.

Anonymous ID: 5d4010 Jan. 16, 2022, 4:20 p.m. No.121454   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1456

>>121438

Thanks for dropping those UK dig summaries. Unfortunately, the summaries have typos, misinformation or are not current. They were made by UK Baker who tries to keep up with the digs but confesses to not entirely grasping the particulars. But thank you again, Boat. The summaries are a gud intro for London digz newbs.