A prayer for the evening:

Dear Father, Name above All Names, our poor powers of praise to You falter, as we can never truly express the magnitude of Truth, Righteousness and Mercy You alone possess. You are the master of all.

Bless those who come here to serve the cause of justice. We humbly ask that You grant us the understanding, perseverance and discernment necessary to advance the cause of real justice among the nations. Be with our leaders, our servicemen, our families, friends and those who need Your merciful blessings and protection, here and around the world. Lift the cauls from our eyes that we may see, and strengthen us to be a comfort and help to those who need it.

Be with the needy and poor, both in spiritual and material needs. We beseech you in the name of Your Son, our Lord and Savior Christ Jesus, to forgive us our sins and iniquities which are ever before us. Grant us victory in Your Name, the Great I AM, and through your Holy Spirit minister to us that we will gain the triumph over those who seek to destroy us.

We are not their servants, Lord. We belong to You. Let Thy Will be done.

In the name of your precious Son, Christ, let Thy Will be done. Deliver us, one and all.

Amen.

>>23804

Amen! Seconded!

>>23769 PB

>>23820

The Federal Aviation Administration, in response to a series of more than a dozen such shootings, recently confirmed that shooting down a drone is a federal crime and cited The Aircraft Sabotage Act, 18 USC 32, a statute that makes it a felony to damage or destroy any aircraft, manned or unmanned.

>>23823

Maximum permitted altitude for unmanned aerial systems is 400 feet

https://www.faa.gov/news/fact_sheets/news_story.cfm?newsId=22615

>>23830

See >>23829

>>23842

FAA is authorized to make regulations and their opinion as to whether taking down a UAS carries a lot of weight with the courts, since courts don't routinely handle air traffic controller duties (which, if you think about it, is pretty darn vital to get right). Fed courts pay attention to stuff like that.

That law hasn't been tested in Federal courts yet, but most are left to the states to prosecute. Here's a very good listing of drone cases. The criminal cases are towards the bottom.

https://jrupprechtlaw.com/drone-lawsuits-litigation

>>23846

Judges make law every day. Why do you think we're trying to get some of them out?

And they darn sure DU interpret laws, that is exactly their job. They interpret everything from evidentiary rulings to arguments about civ/crim procedure to whether the death penalty applies. That's why appellate courts exist, to review whether they interpreted the law properly.

If judges just willy-nilly "if this, then that" applied the law, we might as well have computers on the bench. And since things frequently don't fit existing case law exactly, some judgment (i.e. JUDGE-MENT) has to be made.

>>23846

Derp.

>>23858 meant for >>23844

>>23863

Yeah, ok. I'm sure you'd feel the exact same way if you were in a criminal trial and a judge determined that exculpatory evidence would not be admissible under a hearsay exception that "arguably" might not apply....

But what the heck? It's just "refereeing" the case, not actually interpreting law...

I can show you about 1000 cases per year where judges are interpreting evidentiary laws alone, as well as procedural.

And, since you're probably not aware of this, juries have to be told what laws they are applying in what is called a jury charge. That is where they are given instructions on the applicable law. Who decides what instructions should/shouldn't be given?

Surprise surprise

The Judge

>>23876

Entirely no disagreement on getting rid of activist judges.

It is properly the judge's job to apply equity in extreme cases (which is to make a decision to do right and find a narrow exception to a law, when the application of that law is so unfair that it does injustice in itself).

That's the difference between law and equity. Equity should be VERY RARELY applied, though.

But when you give a person the power to make decisions over others, I have found very few situations in which the people with power will restrain themselves from playing favorites, unfortunately.

>>23883

Yes.

>>23890

Of course.

Sometimes it's the judge's best good faith effort to try and get it right. People are human and make mistakes.

Sometimes it's a question of highest bidder, but most judges avoid outright briberty.

Quite frequently, the issue is qui bono.

>>23891

List looks goofy. It's not GWB, it's GHWB, on that list.

I checked. GHWB was alive when Bohemian Grove 2018 was held, but would he really been in attendance? Guy was 94, he croaked that November.

>>23917

See above. This looks a little stinky to me.

>>23926

No, ya don't say?

I read the list. It does not say GWB. It says GHWB. Cap related.

>>23960

No sweat, and undoubtedly.

I'm wondering if it's a list of "invitees" as opposed to "attendees". That's a long list - 60 pages, I didn't count but it had to be over 1000 names, easy, there were about 25/30 names per page.

>>23969

That had slipped deep into the recesses of my beer-sodden brain, but now that you bring it up I do recall it.

>>23974

I recognize a few of the less well known names as business types and general rich bahstahds, but most are unknowns. I grabbed one at rando near the top of the list and did a quick dig. Here's what I got:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_C._Atkinson

An American professor of psychology and academic administrator. He is the former president and regent of the University of California system, and former chancellor of the University of California San Diego.

Wikipoopia. It sucks but works in a pinch.

>>23900

I'm not judging, just passing info. If I catch one out my window it's coming down. Then I'm gonna pull the serial #, the FAA # (if it has one), smash it with a hammer so the gunshot isn't recognizable, toss it into the street, and track down the miscreant who flew it.

>>23989

Yeah, not a dig I'm gonna make.

I just look at that list in the vague, disinterested way that someone looks at another guy he doesn't know very well and whose butt he's about to kick.

The mil in me comes out sometimes and I don't see people, I see targets.

>>24007

>>24003

>>24005

I'm pretty good with all of the above. Of course, if the drone driver ponies up a video of me shooting his crap out of the sky, I'll just say it's a deep fake

>>24009

No worries. Not about to invest any significant time looking over a bunch of losers like that. I already know some inside dirt about Powell's drunk driving hit-n-run the night GWB was elected, that somehow got "lost" by the Metro PD. I figure all these guys are protected little faggitrons

>>24021

Mebbe the new word for treason?

"Faggitronism" - def. (adv.); the act of betraying one's country in a very new and gay way that is deserving of maximum punishment, or death, whichever is more convenient.

>>24028

I approve. But I'm easy that way.

>>24033

OOH, OOH, MR. KOTTAIR!!!

Oh goodness, anons, I've completely lost track of time.

Due to some upcoming work I'll be changing my wake up time to 4 am for a week or so, and I need to get some sleep. Besides, my dog's cold wet nose is telling me he's ready to get put on the bed (he's too old to jump anymore) so it's off to the land of nod for me.

Good night, wonderful frens. Keep digging and I'll see you betimes.

>>24156

>>24164

Back from sleepytime.

Cocur. NEFAN.

Not Enough For A Notable

>>24253

No. Don't see what you're driving at. Enlighten us, please.

>>24477

Oh dear, the Gyrenes have arrived with the moto poasts...

Just lift weights and clean bores all day, can't do anything useful like drive a swab...

Kek!

Anons, just finished up a look at some cuts from Rusty's latest video. Pics attached with analysis.

Took 'em from >>>/qresearch/7129614

The anon who posted them over there actually asked if that was blood on a rock. Like there wasn't moar to see. Good grief.

These don't look like USGI-quality UGS (Unmanned Ground Sensors) and they aren't particularly well camouflaged, so I question whether it's a recent install or a sign of pilfering.

However, I DID post a couple times lately before this last video drop from Rusty that it would be nice to see some evidence that our Froggish Frens from SOCOM had paid a visit to the place...

And this sorta looks like that kind of handiwork.

Just interdasting on several different levels, no?

>>24513

"Called" as in someone says it happened? I didn't catch that but my -ahem- attendance record here is unfortunately spotty due to irl stuff.

Interdasting to me that I (and others, apparently?) have asked, and possible evidence delivered by Rusty? Hmmmm...makes all the dronery going on much moar curious on a whole knew level, huh?

>>24518

Tanks. Call it sort of a professional hobby.