Anonymous ID: 740540 April 28, 2021, 4:13 p.m. No.49103   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9105 >>9108

>>49097

>When the former head of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), Dr. Robert Redfield, recently said Covid-19 likely leaked from a Chinese research lab, news headlines called it “shocking."

>

>Dr. Robert Redfield on CNN: “I still think the most likely etiology of this pathogen in Wuhan was from a laboratory— you know, escaped.”

>

>That was followed by a flurry of media reports ridiculing the notion; insisting that Covid-19 probably jumped from bats to people through an unexplained, natural route. But there’s new information that hasn’t been widely reported. A sizable segment of the research community has formed the same opinion as Dr. Redfield: that Covid-19 leaked from experiments at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.

>

>https://sharylattkisson.com/2021/04/video-exclusive-investigation-separating-rumor-from-fact-on-covid-19s-origin/

>

>very detailed, in-depth report from a truly outstanding reporter.

>Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

>

>▶Anonymous 04/28/21 (Wed) 14:48:41 5ea13f (11) No.49046

>

>File (hide): 4a464c59b7f073d⋯.png (130.75 KB, 400x243, 400:243, Rudy_G_thumb_up.PNG) (h) (u)

>

>>>49042

>

>>>49044

>

>tyb

>Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

>

>▶Anonymous 04/28/21 (Wed) 14:48:54 16c3cf (6) No.49047

>

>File (hide): daa4a6196242ea2⋯.png (243.23 KB, 341x379, 341:379, baker_shining.png) (h) (u)

>

>>>49044

>

>tyb

>Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

Why you hijacking anons posts?

Anonymous ID: 740540 April 28, 2021, 4:58 p.m. No.49132   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9140

>>49129

just do digs with other anons research? Nothing worng wit dat, but anons get credit where anons deserve. fucking guy attributed my post to hisself! not cool

Anonymous ID: 740540 April 28, 2021, 5:20 p.m. No.49145   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9149

>>49144

you obviously didn't actually look...it is the exact same post with the exact same wording only several moments later, mine first on qresearch then the other anons later...I am flattered that my post was well received but fuck, credit due because I found it, not that anon!

Anonymous ID: 740540 April 28, 2021, 5:26 p.m. No.49151   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9157

>>49149

What you say is true and I am truly flattered that my original post was reposted here (a place i have never been before). It incensed me that that anon was able to make my post look like their post ... whatever