Anonymous ID: b642e4 July 20, 2021, 8:43 a.m. No.74006   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4058 >>4079 >>4102

MTG is back on twitter - and not backing off even one millimeter from attacking evil villains

 

Marjorie Taylor Greene

@mtgreenee

ยท

2m

Heading over to the Senate to see what Dr Fauci is saying now.

 

Itโ€™s always something different.

 

#FireFauci

Anonymous ID: b642e4 July 20, 2021, 9:24 a.m. No.74017   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4018 >>4058 >>4079 >>4102

Enjoy watching Fauci trying to wriggle of the hook when asked "Is the s1 subunit of the spike developed [previously] the same as the one in Sar-Cov-2?"

(as in, is this REALLY a 'new' thing?)

Fauci keeps asking for the q to "be more specific" (hoping the audience will think he's the expert and these 'lay' questions are ignorant)

 

finally admits "yes, but it's irrelevant"

(claiming you have to know the context)

TOTAL BS

but fun to watch

 

one response says it well:

Sagacious Pelican

@Pelicanussagaci

Replying to

@disclosetv

Fauci obfuscates into specificity when answering a non-expert question, dodging a real answer through jargon, and being a disengenuous dickhead.

 

Disclose TV:

 

NOW - Dr. Fauci wouldn't answer the question of whether the spike protein S1 matched a previous spike version created during gain-of-function research.

https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1417511054192648203

 

Tried to find a date for "previously" or for the study Fauci is talking about - no dice. There are many studies it could be (lots of previous work looking at spike proteins and Sars).