Anonymous ID: 01aec0 July 14, 2019, 6:42 p.m. No.7635   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7652

>>7618

Got to be honest, we can't afford to lose /qresearch/.

It's been "established" at this point in time. Too many people who don't even visit will still associate it.

A fight still needs to be held on the other board, especially if Q continues to post there, which I'm certain will continue.

Anonymous ID: 01aec0 July 14, 2019, 6:57 p.m. No.7692   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7697 >>8168

>>7652

I replied directly to Q's last post. Probably do nothing, but I let it be known there are clearly enough of us having an issue with the current state of the board.

And I refuse to believe mil intel would think removing notables would be a good idea, even if they had become a little "tested". It'd be like never briefing/updating an operator and telling them to go figure out everything they missed throughout the day/overnight by themselves.

Anonymous ID: 01aec0 July 14, 2019, 7:01 p.m. No.7705   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7724

Ah, shit. Everything's coming to a head...

"Last posts will cause self-destruct etc." Q post.

"A second resort to /qresearch/ will be needed etc." post.

The QR voat being cut down/out last month.

The Epstein arrest, the house of cards beginning to fall...

/qresearch/ is going to get nuked soon. BO will probably get exposed, shuts the fucker down, arrests etc. are happening or about to.

Voat was probably gonna be the intended refuge but that's fucked...

Anonymous ID: 01aec0 July 14, 2019, 7:13 p.m. No.7747   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8037

>>7656

About moving on to "advanced training"; changes my opinion on what happened to the massive wave of anons that just seemingly vanished over a week back in early 2018.

Considered many a thing and now back to this...