We have a small group right now. That is power in and of itself in some ways.

We can take on a task as this small group and blow up a narrative.

We don't have many anons and we certainly don't have the shill count.

Let's blow up the MSM narrative of Epstein got massages from 14,15 year olds and jerked off to them shirtless.

Let's show what child sex trafficking really is not! Massages from teens is not what Epstein was in to.

Jessica Tarlov ( Fox News )or whatever her name is, said we should be looking into every man that was associated to Epstein.

Fine look into the men, focus on the gay males.

Expose the females too.

Males 1st and show them as gay therefore the narrative is wrong.

Then show females . Show females who are also gay.

This is the way to teach normies that this child trafficking is not about sexual pleasure of men liking teen girls.

It is about something bigger.

It is about teens, adolescents, toddlers, and infants.

It is not about personal pleasure of sexual desires like what we know pedos to be.

It really has nothing to do with sex. Even though sex is involved.

Find perps who have come out of the closet as gay. Male and female. Show what is known to be straight men and women involved. Blow up the narrative!

Once we blow up the narrative, we can introduce the ritualistic motive by linking some of these same people to covens,cults, or satanic practices.

Allowing the MSM to continue a story that Epstein was so rich and powerful with powerful connections that he never got caught before is like allowing Jimmy Saville.

Memes of what is a MAP? What is a TAP? Does T always mean Teen Attracted Person or does it mean Toddler?

Memes of how many sex predators have you known in your life? ( while showing the Clintons with many )

>>7630 everyone ,is looking for links to Epstein and Raneire, or Epstein and Podesta, or Epstein and ...... whoever! The artists are the link!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>7654 something is not right for sure. Look at the water movement thought. That is being pushed out not coming in.

The strength in the tide is from shore and weakens as it goes out. The water movement twirls in the direction of back to shore

>>7675

that would be too easy! Nothing about this has been easy. I wish I thought you were right though.

2 people filed amicus briefs in the civil case. 1 as John Doe ( we all think is Prince Andrew ) 1 as Jane doe. John Doe got a lawyer from NY as I recall, and Jane got a well known lesbian lawyer from DC.

Filing as John or Jane Doe is rare but happens. They must file gender specific though. I don't know about anyone else , but I am dying to find out who Jane is!. I suspect Prince Andrew is John so it is not that interesting to me. Jane on the other hand is wildly fascinating. The 2 law firms obviously worked in unison with filing the briefs, yet they are located in 2 areas and diametrically different for clientele. The lesbian ( feminist ) aspect is going to be extremely important in this story as the documents get unsealed.

>>7832 not important to the case per se. These 2 people were named in the case as accusers. They were named with others. They filed briefs to keep the documents sealed because it would be embarrassing. They were never charged and having the accusations out there was wrong ( according to their lawyer )

A female who is using a well known lesbian law firm was accused of being a perp on the island

>>7843

not as accusers but by accusers . sorry for typo

>>7860

zactly my point! Someone is coming out as lesbian! Just like Kevin Spacey did when he got caught.

The law firm is a well known lesbian advocate

>>7902

who knows at this time. Could be Duchess of York but I am 60/40 ruling her out so far. Spousal Privilege would suggest they used the same lawyer and not 2 firms in 2 locations. Could be Fergie. Could be HRC who knows her hubby is fried anyway so she could play hero to LGBT and come out as gay. I honestly don't know but these are my top contenders

>>7926

The amicus briefs were Bogus Stuff. They could never have been expected to be successful with a non corrupt Judge. They accomplished stalling though. It will be interesting to get the civil case documents

>>7927

I am c blind. I have similar traits to Asperger's. I see things others can't but don't see things others can. I see patterns and oddities people can't see. I can't see the orange hunter's vest in the woods, but I can show you an underground bunker from an aeriel view in a jungle or desert.

visual perception is equal to cognitive perspective

>>7995

not pure speculation. Jane Doe filing is a female under common law rules.

>>8047 we are all speculating right now about who the female is. The use of John and Jane Doe is common law practice . It stems from original British law. It doesn't mean the defendants are British but it leans towards that heavier. The filing was a hail Mary. Looking for a friendly Judge or buying time to stop the documents some other way. I will probably get shocked and find out John Doe is not Prince Andrew but right now John is less interesting to me. Jane has my interest because of the choice of lawyer. This is about the Court of public opinion and not a Court of law or Court of Equity