>>76512
such an excellent article, here's the english translation - will add to Covid thread too
https://www.meckerseite.de/rechtsanwalt-reicht-erste-pcr-klage-ein/
Reiner Fuellmich submits first PCR lawsuit
'''FOCUS ON POPULAR MISLEADERS--
On November 23, 2020, the first PCR lawsuit was filed in a German court. The application is 54 pages long and should lead to a seminal discussion.
Lawsuit against the people-busters
The lawsuit was filed with the Berlin Regional Court on November 23, 2020. The plaintiff is the pulmonologist Dr. med. Wolfgang Wodarg, who was supported by the lawyer Dr. Reiner Fuellmich is represented.
It is litigated against, among other things, the so-called vermin of the people, who discredit serious scientists. The plaintiff suffered considerable financial damage, which also had an impact on his own creditworthiness. But the damage to reputation, honor and reputation should not be underestimated.
It is the aim of these popular misleaders to discredit all those people who express themselves critically against the Corona measures. This is intended to reduce the credibility in order to support the government's corona measures.
It is interesting that Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg is portrayed as a "liar" in a black and white view. He is assumed to be a corona denier. With this, according to the people-busters, he should be for massive damage to the population.
Neither does Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi deny that Dr. Wodarg the existence of the coronavirus. However, the statements made by the media about the “ national scope ” must be critically scrutinized. The experts say nothing else.
In the meantime, in January 2021, a judge at the Weimar District Court found clear words and described the current Corona policy as a “catastrophic political wrong decision”. This is a sign that criticism of the measures is necessary.
A mass test with PCR lawsuit challenged
Dr. In his statements, Wodarg often refers to the lack of informative value of the PCR tests. But other scientists in very respected circles do the same.
Attorney Dr. Reiner Fuellmich made a very well-founded statement on the PCR test in the application. In doing so, he cites a number of scientific heavyweights who are also very critical of the Drosten test. At least on one crucial point:
The PCR test is not able to detect an infection.In particular, not who it is artificially scaled beyond all dimensions. The Drosten PCR test cannot reliably detect an infection with SARS-CoV-2 either . For this, too, numerous evidence is given in the extensively researched complaint.
It gets even more exciting because Dr. Fuellmich refers to a fundamental judgment of the Portuguese Court of Appeal in Lisbon . On November 11, 2020, the Portuguese judges took the PCR test under fire and declared it to be unsuitable. An important fact that the German judges cannot ignore.
To avoid misunderstandings:
The function of the PCR test is not supported by the Portuguese judges or by Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Fuellmich questioned. However, the test cannot distinguish whether the gene sequence found comes from a living virus or from a dead virus. Everything is displayed. However, a dead virus would mean that the person who tested positive cannot infect other people.
What's next?
The PCR lawsuit is public and can be viewed by anyone. In contrast to numerous other lawsuits that were filed as urgent proceedings, these are so-called " main proceedings ".
Main proceedings take a long time. The advantage lies in the comprehensive taking of evidence so that all arguments are put to the test. The journalist Markus Langemann has already conducted several interviews with the German-American lawyer Dr. Pure fill me.
page 1