Yeadon's a powerful speaker with the creds needed to take down Pfizer and the rest. Pray for his wellbeing, along with Modi and other courageous leaders opposing the genocidal covid narrative.
I'm now listening to the conference from which this Yeadon clip was taken: FIVE HOURS.
(haven't watched FB for years, but this is worth it)
Among the speakers on Day 2:
Sucharit Bhakdi, Reiner Fuellmich, Catherine Austin Fitts.
First speaker is talking about govt's using psychological Tavistock style tactics to see covid lies.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=344631127144043&id=285303174858472
i'm jus runnin around from thing to thing
busy
can listen to conference while i run
so many great doctors and others
it's hard to break down cell biology for lay people like me
incredibly complex, but they are doing their best
i just think in terms of railway cars latching on (spike protein to cell) and lipoproteins being like wd40. not very accurate but works for me - don't think they'll be asking muh opinion
just found out luciferase is isolated from fireflies
enables them to glow in the dark
KEK
hello m'friend - usually run into at nite
good to know 'sinking' was a typo
(hey ron - what about freudian slips??_
https://t.me/CodeMonkeyZ/939
(the one we've been talking about) is the last post i see on telegram
https://t.me/CodeMonkeyZ/940
you are right, his explanation is no longer there
why deleted?
notable
well, getting into the fine points....
"signature" has several meanings
-
can denote an individual's identify ( = literal)
-
can also denote an individual's trademark style or approach - the way they use an image, word, etc. ( = figurative)
-
or can emphasize info (espec when at the start or end of a passage) as critically important, especially when seen as part of an ongoing pattern ("look here, this is important!")
I would say that Q calling Alice & Wonderland ( or Alice in Wonderland) 'signatures' could mean any of these, need not refer to a particular person. The usage could also vary, depending on context.
Not denying any particular possibility but saying to make a definitive case would require more converging evidence, imo. That's all. When baking, i will sometimes ask for more evidence. Or if interesting (but unproven) notable as "Anon's theory on X"
Or post as a question and digg call (if the theory just lacks evidence that may be out there):
"Is X true? Call for a DIG"
But theories are theories - i always tend to be cautious with them.
image not displaying 4 me
says "Website blocked due to trojan"
We strongly recommend you do not continue.
that's fine, was just responding to the 'disputing' part.
<Archiving Fuellmich vids....
they are the best.
i'm trying to note Fuellmich vids whenever possible.
Have you uploaded these to anonfiles.com or anywhere else? Can you add pointers to the
"fake pandemics" thread?
There is so much info now it's hard to keep up.
https://8kun.top/qrb/res/48592.html
excellent
yes, the files would be big - because the sessions are so long. listen to them with working outside or doing other tedious tasks. helps with remembering the different people involved, it gets to be a blur.
i know they do stuff intentionally
MS word - always second-guessing the user
they think we're stupid, only reason they're dominant is MS put out all its early software with lots of bugs ( really'alpha' versions) - better products like wordperfect couldn't keep up because they refused to do that.
I'm not super technical but realized a long time ago that MS doesn't get better because they started with dirty code and never cleaned it up, just built more crap on top of it. you can't write long docs with Word, craps out really quite - and worse with graphics. Can't index past a certain point either, more break down.
have new computer, trying out librewriter. seems ok so far and it's FREE.
ah, then they finally got caught
had a long run
most stuff is still up, last i checked
banning is a funny thing, often not consistent
got to "try harder"
hahahaha
If i need to do serious writing w/images, use InDesign (much more stable but lacks - can u believe it - endnotes).
while shitposting, still listening to Yeadon and other docs talk about vax passports as being the ultimate objective behind everything.
Anons know this, but general public - no.
important to have more and more doctors coming on board with scientific evidence.
And seeing beyond the medical stuff and telling the people about the Great Reset and the planned Medical Technocracy.
Also, they are respected - much harder to discredit than us ordinary mortals (espec "Q followers", kek).
We may not like the idea of medical doctors as a social elite, but might as well exploit it since it's the status quo.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=344631127144043&id=285303174858472
Michael Yeadon:
"The vaccine passports are the ENTIRE objective."
Listen to him paint the picture of how some influential people are being convinced to go along with the plan.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=344631127144043&id=285303174858472
~2 hours, 29 minutes