https://twitter.com/RealMattCouch/status/1441485564168056832
tanks cakes
Vaccine Effectiveness Drops Further in the Over-40s, To as Low as Minus 53%, New PHE Report Shows – And That’s a Fact
https://dailysceptic.org/2021/09/24/vaccine-effectiveness-drops-further-in-the-over-40s-as-low-as-minus-53-new-phe-report-shows-and-thats-a-fact/
PHE = Public Health England
It’s official: I am spouting misinformation about the Covid vaccines. Full Fact – the Google, Facebook and George Soros-funded outfit that Ofcom has said it relies on to tell it what to censor regarding COVID-19 – has ‘fact checked‘ my recent piece on PHE data showing negative vaccine effectiveness in August and branded it “incorrect”.
Writer Leo Benedictus – henceforth to be known as the Oracle – takes particular issue with the headline, which he says “falsely claims that a report from Public Health England (PHE) shows the COVID-19 vaccines having ‘negative effectiveness’ in the over-40s”.
“This is not true about the COVID-19 vaccines – nor is it true that the PHE report shows this,” the Oracle declares. Except it is. The data contained in the report is completely clear, and the calculation of unadjusted vaccine effectiveness from that data is straightforward.
According to the Oracle, however, this is not a valid way of estimating vaccine effectiveness. Benedictus quotes the PHE report stating as much – “The vaccination status of cases, inpatients and deaths is not the most appropriate method to assess vaccine effectiveness and there is a high risk of misinterpretation” – and notes that I too quote this. What he fails to acknowledge, though, is that I also examine the reason PHE gives for this claim and counter it.
The only substantive reason PHE gives that vaccine effectiveness might be underestimated in its data is that “vaccination has been prioritised in individuals who are more susceptible or more at risk of severe disease”. In other words, the high-risk are over-represented in the vaccinated and this skews the sample. I countered that the large majority of the older age groups are now vaccinated so this bias should be very much reduced. Of course, we also need to ask why, if this is supposedly the key confounder of the data presented, we are not also provided with the necessary data on risk categories so that it can be duly quantified and accounted for....
Dr. Shiva Results
did signature verification with a very low (liberal) threshold and found lots of anomalies & diferences from Maricopa stats
-
Shiva's crew found many more dups that Maricopa
-
more duplicaties came in at the end - Nov 4 - 9.
-
"stamped and approved" - all came in after Nov 4
hahahahaha
Concusion
-
The EVB return envelope is very important
-
There are significant opportunities to improve 5 attibutues
-
EVB's are currently Unverifiable
-
We have far more dups that are in the system
We need to do a full signature verification audit
I gotta go
-out
Process
• Over 100.000 man hours were pul into processing 2.1 million ballots by hand.
• Each ballot went through an examination under a High Quality DLSR camera along with microscopic images of the fronts and backs of the ballots
• Completed so far: I land-counting of all federal races, image and microscope capture of each ballot, review and comparison of official results, and the analysis of the voter rolls
• We arc soon expecting the review of splunk logs and routers and final paper examination report
Findings
• Canvass showed over 3.400 more ballots were castcd than recorded
• Over 9.000 more mail-in ballots were received and recorded than the official number of mail-in ballots sent out by the county
• Precincts show more ballots casted on election day than people who showed up to vote. 1.551 extra votes.
• Approximately 2.500 ballots were shown in the Early vote returns that do not have a voter listed as casting them.
• Over 255,000 early votes shown in the county’s final vote file that do not have a corresponding entry in the early voting returns file
• Over 23.000 voted by mail after moving after the October 5,h cutoff
• 2.382 voters castcd votes in Maricopa county, in person, after moving out of the county
• Over 2.000 voter who moved out of Arizona during the 29 days before the election were given a full ballot instead of a presidential-only ballot.
• Close to 300 deceased voters potentially voted
• There are an unprecedented number of discrepancies in the vote total. This could only happen through malicious actions or severe incompetence from Maricopa county officials.
back from appt
tbh, wasn't really expecting a tsunami
hence - "chop wood, carry water"
that deal made with supervisors made me uneasy
not so much that 'the fix is in'
but that these traditional politicians keep expecting the system (somehow) to work - they just gonna present the evidence and 'justice will be done'
they can still find the evidence needed to DECERTIFY
but they gonna hafta PUSH
Need the kind of fuggen PASSION u see in a Flynn, Sidney, Lin Wood or Mike Lindell
Mike might not be perfect, but he has the fire needed to throw the tea into the bay
How many times did Q say "military"?
Many layers to the "process." People fall back into old habits very easily - takes a 9/11 or something like it to wake em up.
>all this we do daily is fun, guud info and mostly info warfare that has no effect on the outcome what so ever accept for peeps to understand
The understanding does matter, tho. We keep up on 'sup so we can answer questions once they're finally asked. Example - stuff on HCL/IVM and other covid/covid vax - that info is already wanted by some, have helped direct people to resources.
Lots of smoking guns that provide a place to start - need cooperation from others to move forward. Dat's always been the sticking point.
Meanwhile, we stick together and hold the line.
do either of u remember seeing this?
din know about it
can't ck qresear.ch right now, it's a new version - says it has 600 refs but points nowhere, will have to tell RA about it....
UBS looks to raise stake to 67% in mainland China joint venture
By Reuters Staff
HONG KONG, March 12 (Reuters) - '''UBS Group is moving to increase ownership in its Chinese securities joint venture to 67%, as two local partners put their stakes up for sale, an exchange filing shows.==
Guangdong Provincial Communication Group and China Energy Investment Corp, which currently owns 14.01% and 1.99% of the joint venture, will auction their entire holdings, filings on the China Beijing Equity Exchanges showed.
The exchange did not name the potential bidders, but UBS said the auctions will result in UBS holding 67% of the JV if the deal is done.
“China is a key market for UBS. The further opening up of China’s financial sector represents great opportunities for all of our China businesses, including wealth and asset management, and investment bank,” UBS said in an emailed statement to Reuters.
“We are committed to the China market and will continue to invest strategically. Our further stake interest in UBS Securities demonstrates such commitment.”
UBS was the first bank to move to majority control of 51% in November 2018 after foreign banks were allowed to take larger stakes in their joint ventures.
Majority or full ownership could make it easier for foreign banks to expand their operations in the multi-trillion-dollar Chinese financial sector.
Goldman Sachs has applied for 100% ownership of its operations and JPMorgan owns 71% of its operations.
Morgan Stanley has been touted as the buyer of a 39% stake that its joint venture partner Shanghai Chinafortune Co will sell in Morgan Stanley Huaxin Securities that would take the U.S. bank’s ownership to 90%. (Reporting by Scott Murdoch in Hong Kong and Samuel Shen in Shanghai; editing by Jason Neely)
https://www.reuters.com/article/ubs-group-china/ubs-looks-to-raise-stake-to-67-in-mainland-china-joint-venture-idUSL4N2LA2G1
Until at least 2018, UBS has more going on in China than this - finding more stuffs, see this article. Looks like it's a coupla years old.
And we know about UBS AG transaction last Oct that involved $400mil from Staple Street.
https://irvinejournal.com/News/2908
SO
Are they really pulling out of China?
This was NEVER covered afaik when Lin Wood was tweeting stuff out last Dec. about UBS and Dominion ownership. Don't think this has been mentioned, either. Seent?
>>10312
UBS in China
https://www.ubs.com › linklist › china-factsheet
China is a key market for UBS. In 1964, UBS was the first Switzerland-based bank to establish a presence in the Asia Pacific
region, primarily through its wealth management business. UBS has provided corporate finance advice to Chinese enterprises
since 1985. UBS invested early in mainland China. Since 1989, its operations have expanded and now include a multi-entity domestic platform with a broad range of licenses. Its China strategy is to broaden the leadership position held by its investment bank and expand the wealth and asset management businesses by taking advantage of the opportunities that come from the
ongoing wealth creation, market reform and globalization in China. UBS is well-positioned to grow its domestic wealth management business by levering on both UBS (China) Limited and UBS Securities. As a leading asset manager, UBS offers a broad range of onshore and offshore investment products and capabilities.
UBS consistently ranks top among international investment banks operating in China. In December 2018, UBS increased its
shareholding in UBS Securities, its investment banking arm, to 51%, to become the first foreign financial institution to raise its
stake and take majority control of a securities joint venture in China.
never saw that 67% figure - only 24.99% (everyone repeating Lin Wood, but it was 51% by 2018 Dec).
yes, talked to a friend who's a lawyer and good at finance about that. He said the same - China's not worried, their much more powerful than any one company. Of course, they may not be quite a powerful as they think when it comes to the DS banking interests. Out on a leash?
Don't think so.
It's in the new resource thread but not the only one, i don't think.
Can be confusing, they make it that way - UBS this, UBS that (LLD, Ltd, slight variations in company names on purpose). But think i woulda remembered the spiffy chart.
I'll figure it all out in the next few days.
Can't post it on the main thread bc i'm doing things sort of in order - i'm not to the part where Dominion ownership gets discussed yet. Just throwing Dominion ownership material into the Resource thread atm.
not the *old one (the one on QRB)
good point
but investors have influence, although what kind and how much depending upon the nature of the business, contracts made, etc.
and most of that is hidden when it comes to election systems
they're big on PR but short on transparency
more shell companies than u can shake a stick at
there's some stuffs around that time -
gotta sort it out, too much material
>where UBS puts it's money is where it has control
bingo.
true of all the mega-DS enterprises?
It would appear so. But bc they're ebil, they have achilles heel - always. like Goliath never watching out for little david.....little guy(s) with God to back them.
how would this work financially?
(I trust that God's a better financier than the DS - but how they would fall - idk....)
>Does HSBC assume control if D goes bankrupt?
How much are those patents worth?
>Bain Capital
ah, yes - that's coming back
I'm rusty now - why i was having a hard time when graphics disappeared, coz i was in the thick of digging and then away from it for 3 weeks. Dunno if everyone's like this, but the absence of imagery was disorienting. Why i have to reconstruct the thread, like having a warp with no weft.
there's many election companies, but dominion was not one of the big boys until around 2010 - even diebold din have much going (except prolly for JEFF DEAN's fraction magic) - now i think soros and malloch brown use Dominion to do their dominate-the-world thing (with smartmatic and other companies acting as hand maidens). And now they got all the SoS orgs, NASED, NASS, CISA, EISCC (etc) in their pocket. Devolution part 5 has a noice writeup - it wasn't CISA saying 'elections are fine', it was EISCC.
yeah, u got canadian dominion, canadian HSBC w/ties to China and London, and Soros tides foundation in the office next to dominion in Toronto. Cozy. Just remembered yesterday that Malloch Brown is closely tied to the UN - Un Foundation and lots of other ties. Think he's frens with any of those WHO fellas?
wonder what Trudeau gave up to get them back....a coupla provinces?
gotta get off for a while
will try to make it back, health still a little rough so i'm wingin it
it's the weekend anyway, we always catch as catch can
works out, one way or the other
appreciate everyone's efforts, always thought (somehow) qrb was around for a purpose - didn't die when 8bit left, our fren picked it up and he we are now
Gratitude
-
OUT
will take a look 'fore i leave
Excellent.
Don't worry bout tomorrow, things work out.
we'll all peek in a little, sometime they'll be a bread.
NIGHT for naow.
'thanking you in advance'
o7