but the oceans belong to the anons.
we can be as they are.
we'll just say 'we own this now' and then, magically they will have to follow along.
wait, that doesn't work in the real world.
everyone who goes there eventually becomes a full blown christian. So that's great.
the muslim will all finally be converted.
(tell them this when they discuss it. thta you heard that this is true which why the Slave owners turned into a mueseum.)
is it ethical to tell them something we just made up to make them feel shame for being the pig people?
when they get very offended by being called 'pig people' one can tell them (if they haven't already cut your head off) oh, I'm sorry, it's a translation issue. I only mean the ones that would steal a church to make it into something else by murdering the people who use it.
maybe I should rather not use the phrase 'pig people' but 'tyrannaical slaver invader hypocrite' people. I'm sure that not all people who go to Mosques are like that. Not sure what you mean.
their rage boils.
'you don't mean you think I meant all Muslims? Only the ones who would kill for not being Islamic, or would steal people's properties, or sell them off into slavery, or war monger by breaking generations old agreements due to vanity and false-pride in ancestors.
the marxists have outted themselves by their behaviors. They will pretend to be whaever they think that they can get away with as ethnic imposters.
come one come on,
watch the pod
that way to long
and listen to the endless repeat
of things he thinks are cool and neat.
and when he ask for boons and blessings
because his way impress
if you dare approach to praise
he will feel distress
and if you'd dare to grant a boon
he'll say you are an evil moon
'be gone' he'll yell, 'how would you dare'
imagine that you'd think I'd care.
he say:
"for if someone were to admire me
how pathetic they would have to be"
but he tells everyone he wuvs them and laughter and love.
if you can handle the constant bullying and shaming, then try to, try to be his friend.
but I can see he's good, he's just a bit broken. Can I not advise and help him thrive?
he's like a food vendor machine. The food might be fresh, but if the machine has broken parts, you can see the food, but you can't get at any of it.
(the broken popcorn machine was described in some thin little useful self help book in the 1970s or 80s to describe someone like AG who seems bountious, but is unwilling to trust or be real to others, and lashes out needlessly at others who want to befriend the person. )
If we can't have encryption then we must have a way to secure our legal comms.
it seems to me tht the encryption thing is a canard because (1) it never really works
(2) it makes the ones who use it too much seem as though ya, there has to be something here to see about this person (it makes you glow).
for me it's better to not use it for a site howerver I understand that HTTPS is far superior to HTTP because . . . you can be sure tht the transaction was not spoofed.
so you send the transaction encrypted if there is a purchase or a sale or other necessary transfer of useful data that must be secure.
but then you get to the next part.
what does that even mean 'must be secure'. Who cares if data is withering in a hot room and a tsumani is bout to take it out to sea to flood off to the distant unknown lands . . .
what we want secrue are people.
data is just data.
what we want from data is reliability.
but the trouble is that if you have a 'constant' anyone else can throw a variable at it and thus construct some unknown, that was crafted outside, but doesn't exist on the target.
and so the idea of 'well known static data' also creates an insurmountable obsticle to real security of people and systems.
and when you give out these vectors are you doing too deep a reveal?
the point: any smart dedicated hack, if so inspired, could craft so evil way to do bad stuff on someone else's system and that's still not going to end with the giving the keyes of the encryption kingdom (a swamp, by the way, unsuitable for building castles) to unknown fussy-i-atorri of the cabal quality bullshiitocracy
'the answer'
first what is the question.
I'm going to tenatively suggest that what you are going on about is some kind of rethorical mindfudge.
the ancient temple cults were like amusement parks in some sense, or even dentists offices (if you can believe that) and that had to be seen as magic in a way, to take away pain is such a useful skill.
and the temple would have a franchise and they had to make a profit, and they also did stuff like keep records, banking, ordinary civil stuff.
but they also needed what is technically called a 'schticck' or a seemingly truthful message that is really just a put on that draws you in.
I think that your tablets are a put on to draw in gulible people, into a temple of mean where they don't even do stuff like denistry, or record keeping, but they want your full devotion.
the ancient temple locus would have other venues too. If one group of actors didn't draw your interest (ok, they may have called them priests, or priestesses) you could go to the next one.
and if you like them a lot you might see them perform in the evening at a local theatre.
so, no, the answer to the 'question' is not on some tablet you find in list of archiolgical items.
it might come from some wierdo you meet at a temple, though, if you'd dare to trust him. (most people are good, so that has to apply back in time too)
ya, cause Poland wasn't a Catholic country.
all the millions murdered there, and their cities burned down to ashes.
if hitler hated the jews so much then why was there still a huge Jewish Gettho in Warsaw by the end of the war?
why didn't the Nazis burn all that down?
so you have no idea how to use the board and someone sends you here to report on stuff that you never even read, and you complaign about it?
how much more pathetic can you be?
wait, I bet you do it for compensation!
this is what we put up with here, constant harrassing by people who don't even use the board.
if you didn't see it then you shouldn't report it.
if you were told to report it by someone else, they should have reported it. If they didn't report it you shouldn't bitche here to me about it.
you should tell them that they should do it.
get it?
you'll pretend to be an important oldfag with insider stance.
cool go for it
(actually I have no idea what you will do)
"believe me when I say
I am the most important
oldfag"
"sure, sure you are."
Trust is the real issue.
that is reason for encryption.
one may be an encryptor without knowing the content.
then a reencryptor.
so double independant encryptors who can meet all supeanas and are bonded.
Sounds like a new business.
but no, the big tech can't have independant empowered people holding independant keys.
the stupid thing about those who want to use encryption to 'hide' their sordid content: you don't really think that they know what you watch on your screen by what you send off or call out for on the internet?
you thnk you're not connected. you only know the public and nonclassified networks.
and these crooks of the swamp thought they knew all the networks too.
if you don't study stochastic processes and random variable calculus, or understand communications and all the various ways to modulate and encode, then why are you in charge of regulating it?
they thought they were.
but the network engineers were smart people. They didn't hand the keys to heaven to the do-as-we-sayers.
you archive them on your local machine
because they fall off the server as new content fills up.
someone may have already done this.
you can find a url and maybe someone has their archives on line.
It's too much to archive it all.
I just do select screen shots.
then I have to convert them to jpgs with a low quality or it fills up my storage.
and I've taken to putting them into dated month groupings.
even though the screen caps are all time stamped at the moment of capture, it's too much to keep in one directory.
the convert script I use I couple with an xargs call and it works very nicely by just replacing the file.
and that frees up my harddrives.
"I'm the very mostest important anon"
admits to be being a notables fag.
wow what a worse case shill-profile.
good think you're one of the gaaaoood wons.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_I_of_Castile
is this chap the prototype for the weak Hapsburg female dominated giggillo?
but what if kickkity jams suddenly blare out and everyone just breaks out into spontaneous dancing . . .
maybe it is 12 banks
no one will say it out loud.
they must be having a very bad weekend.
End the [F]uckery
the effects of the expansion of rubber crash test dummy put on a balloon payload up to 120,000 ft above the morning desert?
if the thing were sealed, the body would have bloated out because . . . well that's what happens when you put a balloon into a vacuum.
low presure would have caused that.
but , no, it's a space alien.
my point: Hitler and the Nazis were equal opportunity haters.
they didn't just hate Jews, they hated everyone.
anon, I used to watch them as a teenager in the night time while star gazing as a teenager.
Of course there are satellites.
take a blanket, go out side on a moon free night, and then lay down looking up.
(you might want bug spray too).
and just watch.
you will see them.
and so even though soros was an obvious . . . one (but a fallen one) he was allowed to do whatever he was involved with, and after even became a master of diabolical activism.
so don't you think maybe, in general, the narrative about who the Nazis were, and who the 'hated the most' needs at least a slight modification?
But Soros can't be blamed . . .