What do you say to people who are personally familiar with being dragged through court on fake/false/fraudulent charges made up by corrupt cops and prosecutors?
Is a ‘court case’ against Austin proof that he’s no-good?
Is the absence of charges against someone proof that they are with the Good Guys?
You trust the plaintiff, prosecutors, and FBI because they brought a case to court against Austin, and because of that your satisfied enough by that to conclude his guilt, and further that proves he has nothing of value to say?
Do I understand you correctly? My worldview depends on your carful assessment of this situation which is too complicated for me to make up my own mind.
Flynn spent a lifetime in uniform, Austin has not.
Is there a difference in behavior you can allow for two such people, and they can still be on the same side?
Wait, just a moment ago youanon were telling me what to think… now you’ve changed your mind.
Now I’m lost, no thanks to you.
It’s really a simple, fair, and honest question with an easy answer on the simple point of differing behavior by two people who could well be on the same side.
Seems like a side you are not on.
Your Great Truth Teller The Mighty Q, also said misinformation is necessary.
Kinda hurts the brain, just a little ami right?
Evidence of a court case is not evidence of wrong doing. Nor especially, that alleged wrong doing was actually wrong.
You tried reeeely hard to try and tell me what to think, trying to allege that allegation is proof of wrong doing.
I have no problem (when weighing against all the other problematic crap in this world) leaving a space open in my mind that Austin is someone trying to make the world a better place, and COULD be working as/with/for this “Q”thingy.
He’s at least done more already in that direction than most I’ve met.
This is a bit skitzo, having trouble getting the gist of your lyst.