Anonymous ID: f0b057 July 21, 2020, 4:15 p.m. No.10037088   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7142 >>7285 >>7420

This seems like a simple thing for Congress to extend – who exactly is blocking the continuation of the extra $600? All Republicans? At this point, what difference does it make, and it could win over some votes since people are blaming Trump (nothing new there). Sure, muh deficit and so on, but it's ruined anyway and regular people should finally get something from this do-nothing, no-good, get-rich-through-graft-and-corruption government!

 

White House confirms in an email that Trump meant 70 percent wage replacement when he spoke about extending unemployment benefits at tonight's briefing.

Anonymous ID: f0b057 July 21, 2020, 4:20 p.m. No.10037142   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7165 >>7428

>>10037088

This is the McClatchy article from today.

 

Senate Republicans seek reduction of $600 unemployment benefits in stimulus package

 

Senate Republicans are seeking to reduce — but not eliminate — unemployment benefits related to the pandemic that are expiring at the end of this month, so that recipients are not making more money from the benefit than they did while working.

 

A $600 weekly benefit that Congress included in a stimulus bill earlier this year will expire next week. Lawmakers are racing to pass a new bill that includes emergency relief for businesses and workers before the fast approaching deadline.

 

Republicans are rallying behind a reduction in the extra federal benefit. One idea under discussion is to lower the $600 weekly benefit to a flat amount. Another proposal gaining traction would make it a percentage of what individuals were earning before they were laid off.“What I would try to do is something as a percentage of wages,” said Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., chairman of the Senate Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee.

 

An extension of the current amount of the pandemic unemployment benefit is not supported by President Donald Trump or his advisers. The Trump administration indicated this week, however, that it wants compromise legislation being negotiated on Capitol Hill to include some additional unemployment benefits.

 

Sen. Lindsey Graham, who helped lead an unsuccessful effort in March to eliminate the $600 a week federal unemployment benefit, said Tuesday that he got a sympathetic ear from Trump at a Monday evening dinner.

 

“We’re gonna have to reduce the benefit, but have a federal benefit but reduce it,” the South Carolina Republican told McClatchy.

 

Graham argued in March that the extra $600, a benefit that is scheduled to end next week, would reduce motivation for unemployed recipients to look for work.

 

“There are some people who can’t go back to work that need some help on top of state benefits. We’ve just made it so that it’s a disincentive. Just some compromise on the number that will make it easier to reopen the country,” Graham said Tuesday.

 

The fate of the $600 benefit is uncertain. The House extended it through January in legislation it passed in May, but Democratic moderates are pushing a plan that would tie the amount of a benefit to a state’s economic conditions.

 

Republicans have been reluctant to support any benefit. But Graham, like some other Senate Republicans, faces a potentially tough reelection challenge.

 

https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/congress/article244383167.html>>10037088

Anonymous ID: f0b057 July 21, 2020, 4:35 p.m. No.10037307   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7332 >>7365 >>7520

>>10037047

I think "arrival" is right because nothing in this tweet from Patriot Dancing seems to indicate they are a "rival" of Anons. But I think this has a clue for us: "Girlfriend of @WWinagain"

 

He makes his name look like a first/last but it's Will Win Again.

 

Will Winagain

Anonymous ID: f0b057 July 21, 2020, 4:52 p.m. No.10037493   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7498

This is the most logical explanation, and when I first looked at it I thought that it was a little joke from Qbut some see (or try to find) all types of hidden meanings in misspelled words, numbers, pen positions, and so on. I want to consider everything, but typically the most reasonable answer is the right one.

Anonymous ID: f0b057 July 21, 2020, 4:59 p.m. No.10037580   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10037428

Okay, good to know. I think a lot of people still out of work (I know many) who are counting on that or you will see more mortgage defaults. When you were making six figures selling plastics and lights and whatnot, plus commissions in this great TRUMP economy, and now you realize you are over 45, white, and male, the entire world looks different.

Anonymous ID: f0b057 July 21, 2020, 5:07 p.m. No.10037673   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10037622

Yea, he combs here frantically for his name because it's the only site that doesn't use crawlers to ping him for any mention of his highness through a Google alert.

Anonymous ID: f0b057 July 21, 2020, 5:14 p.m. No.10037735   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10037714

Surprised he covered that and admitted "we don't know" what was said. I heard it live and only heard the word "bitch" and wondered if I was hearing right. A few hours later, listening to the replay, it's hard to tell, especially since the Al Jazeera gal had time to give an alternate phrase to stick in our minds.