Comey wasn't talking about Portland or cops here, was he?

“[T]hey are giving the citizens of Portland —and the rest of us, no matter our politics—what we don’t want: the specter of unconstrained and anonymous force from a central government authority. It has been the stuff of American nightmares since 1776.”

>Hey buddy [Jim Baker], you know those Digital Soldier whackos posting on Twitter all the time on behalf of QAnon? BAN THEM ALL NOW.

Looks like Cornhole's goon squad is still pulling strings after all…but…anons already knew that kek.

https://twitter.com/thejimbaker/status/1272688120794882050

https://twitter.com/Comey/status/1285627020106510338

https://twitter.com/TwitterSafety/status/1285726277719199746

>>10039332

The trick would be for Twatterfags to stop parroting one another with "Q sent me" type shit as to not be found out by algos right quick, but you'll never get anything trending that way. Regardless, any hashtag associated with "us" from this point on will be blacklisted just as soon as they realize, so that's no good either. Memes are the best, because they still can't pick up on the text (that I know), but it would mean we'd have to latch onto to whatever's trending at any given time. That requires coordination, or at least Twatterfags knowing to just include hashtags of current trends at all times. Tedious, but a possibility.

>>10039520

Exactly, and who sets the standard for a Q account? Because I see plenty of MAGA accounts that don't openly endorse Q or any Q-related hashtags (e.g. #WWG1WGA) in their own content, but sometimes retweet obvious Q accounts that do. They could wind up banning people for just liking or retweeting something Q-ish. By that standard, POTUS go bye-bye.

>>10039608

>>10039618

>>10039631

That might work for a bit…POTUS is 45, etc. Get them to ban straight-up numbers, one by one by one…we got infinity at our disposal kek. Or colors, just tweet #GREEN. Or #FROG.

>>10039691

Nailed it.

>>10039711

Kinda.

>Deeper we go, the more unrealistic it all becomes.

>>10039765

This is critical to understand, you can redpill without virtue signalling that you follow Q. A lot of times it can backfire if you do, especially when you're trying to convince the most dyed in the wool sheep. Muh conspiracy…"oh shit, I got banned again."

>>10039849

I have seen this happen, and most replies were confused fuck KEK.

>>10039770

>make @Jack look like a complete tard

BAN EVERYTHING kek!

>>10039917

This afternoon, I thought meh, he thinks he's being cute saying "anonymous," probably wants Q's attention again…then BOOM. Fucker. Kek.

<Throwing in a fresh meme for the day.