>>10053101

>DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH…

>TRUST NO ONE HERE OTHER THAN Q

>THIS SITE HAS BEEN INFILTRATED

If we do our own research, we do not follow anyone, not even Q.

And what you are writing makes no sense.

Yes, this place is obviously infiltrated.

Why does Q not stop it, or go somewhere else?

4chins is comp'd, let's go here.

Oh this place is comp'd too, let's not care about that and stay here.

Why would I 100% trust Q, when he/she/it/they is/are doing that?

Didn't Q even explicitly tell us that he/she/it/they would lie (disinformation)? So which of the drops are lies, and which aren't?

THINK FOR YOURSELF does not equal TRUST $x

>>10053178

infamous 10 days?

>>10053244

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5vinxk9LQ8

>>10053550

I think it's pretty much silly to do that (he was 17 when he did that, after 10 years of Nazi programming), and expecting that person to not follow commands (and get shot in return), MEANWHILE ALMOST ALL SO CALLED JUDGES WERE NOT PUNISHED AT ALL (and these judges used the 'but but but I was just doing my job and applying Nazi law'-excuse).

They were all allowed to continue their job in so called "post-Nazi Germany".

Same shit for politicians.

If you sentence this one, you should sentence every single judge and politician who still lives AS WELL, and at least these people are really responsible. They had enough money to simply walk away, but they stayed in Nazi-Germany.

>>10053576

debt gone is good of course, still it's fucking people who didn't go into debt (either because they knew that debt is bad, or because they didn't earn much) and instead have some money saved at the bank.

People who went into debt to build a house - here you go, now debt is gone and house is yours

People who didn't do that - well fuck you, now your money is gone/worthless and you own nothing, good day sir

Doesn't sound fair to me.

>>10053591

Money system is debt based.

You remove all debt, and all money is flushed down the toilet.

So all suffer who had a positive number in their bank account (higher than their debt record).

>>10053621

>Imagine taking home your whole paycheck, imagine life without central banks (i.e. inflation)

I already said debt gone is good.

Still it's shit for people who saved their income for years and all of that will be gone, you understand that?

I mean the responsible ones, who even saw that going into debt is bad, will be fucked hard, while the ones who were basically stupid and went into debt will be way better off.

The responsible ones will have lost years of their lives for literally nothing in return, while the others at least got something out of it.

And after that the responsible ones may even have to pay rent to the ones who went into debt and got their house(s) for free in the end. Sounds fair? No.

>>10053648

>Why will it be gone?

The current money system is debt based.

Remove all debt, and credit is gone.

>What if all the stolen money you paid to the IRS over the years was returned to you.

So let me repeat what I said:

Person A

• stupid, went into debt, bought 3 houses, would have to pay for them for the next 30 years

• paid tons of money to IRS as well

After debt removed:

now owns 3 houses, gets all money back from IRS too, receives rent payments as well

Person B

• understood the system knew going into debt is bad, didn't buy houses, used rent (which even means paying back debt!)

• paid tons of money to IRS as well

After debt removed:

owns literally nothing, still pays rent, gets all money back from IRS too like everyone else

Tell me that this is fair and good for everyone.

>>10053667

And to make it even more obvious:

Person A

• bank account -50.000 USD

Person B

• saved money over 10 years

• bank account +100.000 USD

• wanted to buy a house, apartment, whatever in 4 years without going into debt / only going a tiny bit into debt

After debt removed

Person A

• bank account 0

• owns 3 houses still

Person B

• bank account 0

• owns nothing

>>10053738

That's not my point.

The point is that both persons wasted centuries on the system, and person A at least gets something out of it, while person B will still be a slave to person A in the end (paying rent).

Person A will be way way better off than person B and thus will not have wasted centuries of his life as much as the other person.

Person A will not have lost basically everything, Person B however will lose everything and will after that still be a slave to person A and will have to work for years again.

>money is an illusion

Even a gold backed dollar is still an illusion and that also will only work when everyone sees value in it - that's what money is.

Still without money good luck with food and having a roof over your head.

>>10053770

>Nature always demands payment eventually for being stupid.

That's actually also my point.

Going into debt IS STUPID.

But these people will now get rewarded for it.

It's in fact the opposite of nature.

Meanwhile someone who pays rent is PAYING someone else's debt. See how ridiculous this is?

Someone who saved for years will get fucked despite that person paying off debt in every single year. It's like someone collecting food so that there is enough to eat and somehow all of that will be gone for good.

Meanwhile a stupid person who ate everything immediately gets rewarded.

That's my problem with that approach.

To be honest I don't have a fair solution to the problem, but this is just bullshit.

In Europe for example in certain countries around 70-80% own their homes.

In other countries only around 30% own their homes, everyone else pays rent.

So what do you do now?

Everyone who owns their home owns it immediately in full, and for everyone else nothing changes at all (primarily low income people)?

This is going to be a big cluster fuck.