ID: e4df68 July 23, 2020, 6:55 a.m. No.10054382   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10053649 (PB)

bloodline breeding practises loosely follow best animal husbandry practise.

 

With racehorses best practise can mean 'taking a nick back."

 

"Taking a nick back" is breeding to first degree of consanguinity - father to daughter, son to mother, brother to sister. This is not all that common is horse breeding because flaws as well as virtues may be selectively amplified

 

A human example from a prominent satanist bloodline family:

 

Robert Wood Johnson not only 'took a nick back' w/ his daughters; when they gave birth to his children/grandchildren

RWJ 'took a nick back' with them too.

 

Objective being the production of a satanic 'double daughter' or +++ daughter or better.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/obituaries/barbara-piasecka-johnson-a-chambermaid-who-married-into-jandj-fortune-dies-at-76/2013/04/03/85c0e95c-9c8e-11e2-a941-a19bce7af755_story.html

 

RWJ was the satanist who left his money to his nurse. The rest of the Johnson family hated the old man, he raped them all as children, and he raped their children. When he grew old and feeble they wouldn't go near him. They hired a nurse. Barbara, the nurse brought him porno tapes and blew him while he watched. RWJ hated his family, and mostly to antagonize them he left 200 m to Barbara for her compassionate nursing.

The Johnson family tried hard was unable to break RWJ's will. Nurse Barbara moved back to Gdansk with 200 million dollars.

 

Breeding practises are family secrets

 

Some purported interviews with satanic bloodline family members shed light on their child rearing practices

 

Hidden Hand Interview:

 

https://www.wanttoknow.nl/wp-content/uploads/Hidden-Hand-full-interview-WantToKnow-info.pdf

 

"Interview with a Rofschild"

 

https://www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/possibly-the-most-interesting-cabal-related-link-you-will-ever-see-an-interview-with-an-architect/

ID: e4df68 July 23, 2020, 7:14 a.m. No.10054544   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4616

>>10054318

Springer has a near monopoly on science publishing.

This is dangerous and bad because publishing determines academic preferment, access to grants etc.

 

Springer uses selective publication to forward cult objective and to suppress non compliant scientists.

 

https://www.springer.com/us