Anonymous ID: 3f5071 July 29, 2020, 10:40 a.m. No.10115416   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Fuud for thawt for anons:

 

How is censoring the medical opinions of licensed physicians not equivalent to practicing medicine without a license?

 

It seems to me the big tech companies are guilty of this (and much more.)

Anonymous ID: 3f5071 July 29, 2020, 11:01 a.m. No.10115648   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Notice that the Dem chairman is focusing on monopoly power of searches and NOT political censorship. I think this is an aircover strategy - distract/deflect/deceive.

Anonymous ID: 3f5071 July 29, 2020, 11:06 a.m. No.10115710   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5726

>>10115693

They switched again - replaying the same Zuck clip.

 

These fuckers are using a video stream switching tactic to cause omission of parts of the stream due to time dilation.

 

Clown tactics.

Anonymous ID: 3f5071 July 29, 2020, 11:18 a.m. No.10115861   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10115797

This is a distraction. This is standard corporate behavior and an antitrust issue.

 

The real issue that they're shitting themselves over is Hydroxychloriquine. Without the fear of Covid, they lose everything because they lose the election.