Anonymous ID: 121283 July 30, 2020, 3:36 p.m. No.10130695   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0707 >>0735

In the IT world, it's well know that defending against assumed infection works far better than perimeter defense.

 

HCQ is a defense against assumed infection.

Masks are perimeter defense.

 

Take this further, and explore what is a more effective deployment strategy:

HCQ is one pill taken every 2 weeks. Done.

 

Masks need to be refreshed when their filters are clogged up (Remember that surgical masks are designed to be used IN A SURGICAL ENVIRONMENT [HEPA Filtered air, increased oxygen], and will clog up quickly with dust/pollen/humidity in our daily environments)

They need to be fitted well

They need to be touched infrequently

They only reduce the chance of infection, and do not boost the bodies ability to reduce viral load once infected

 

The choice is obvious

 

Now the sad details, far more systems are affected by this virus than our immune systems.

The ability to put food on your families table

The ability to maintain your outlook on the future

The physical/emotional pain thresholds we're capable of enduring…

 

THERE ARE MORE DEATHS DUE TO ROCKET INCREASES OF OVERDOSES AND SUICICDES, THAN CHINAS VIRUS ITSELF

THE 'CURE' OF QUARANTINE HAS OFFICIALLY BECOME WORSE THAN THE VIRUS

 

There's an insidious reason why 'social distancing' + Masks are pushed / enforced…

Ideas between people transmit less effectively, if you're already in a state of 'stay away from me'