Anonymous ID: 194673 Aug. 3, 2020, 12:31 p.m. No.10171341   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1387 >>1865

The imagery it uses it vile and shocking, and it was clearly intended to be an attack on the virtue of motherhood, showing that a growing fetus is a cancer to cut out, the short hair on the…thing… is indicative of the sheering off of all feminine qualities. There is also a hint of innocence lost to it with the blood staining the white clothes, it also brings to mind the child sacrifices of moloch, but instead of divine favour, the offerer is receiving nothing more than freedom from responsibility, but, ironically, that very freedom leads to their enslavement to the bestial instincts. The figure is a surreal charicature of a woman, an ugly simulacra, it shows the state of modern women who engage in abortion and debauchery: that they are not real women at all, but merely take the shape of one. The are post-woman, some kind of half-human demonic beast that takes part in the holiest of all rituals, that of conception, child making, or simply put sexual union, it enjoys the pleasure of this action but then casts off all meaning, all feeling, and all consequence. It shows they are immature children who want to eat all the sugar in the world but don't understand that their teeth will rot and bellies bloat with fat. But their is a silving lining to this, this thing is visibly disgusting, and no sensible person would want to imitate it, sure, the already "adult" women (women are never truly adults) will laud this display as empowering and all that spiel, but that is because they are already lost, they've already given themselve to countless men and killed countless children, they egg this thing on because they see themselve in it. The young, virignal girl, yet to be ruined, will look at this thing and, because her innocence and femininity is still intact, she will, with luck and proper guidence, thing "i do not what to became that." Because being pure, and therefore beautiful, the young girl will be drawn to like beauty.