Anonymous ID: 3f0e0b Aug. 4, 2020, 4:13 a.m. No.10177672   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7678 >>7683 >>7699

>>10177665

Um, I don't think there's any real sauce for Jesus having sex with women. There's conjecture. But he never mentioned it. There's no wife or children. In fact, he preached becoming a eunuch (which maybe should be translated as becoming celibate, I'm not sure). The Bible does say some of his disciples did leave their wives upon becoming converted though.

Anonymous ID: 3f0e0b Aug. 4, 2020, 4:19 a.m. No.10177693   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7697

>>10177678

It's conjecture and would actually completely contradict what he said about celibacy, so I'm going with no. If anything, it's just as likely he had sex with men in the years before he realized his calling. There are those lost years between his childhood and his 30s when he began to spread his message. Who knows what he did then. He is without sin, but htat doesn't necessarily mean to me that he NEVER sinned, but that he became so enlightened in his mission for God that he repented himself of all son, demonstrating man can become as close to God as he is. That's conjecture too, but more in keeping with what the actual Bible intimates.

Anonymous ID: 3f0e0b Aug. 4, 2020, 4:27 a.m. No.10177718   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7719 >>7724 >>7733 >>7749

>>10177697

>>10177699

 

Hey I know I'm trying to have a theological conversation with shills. But I'm stuck in here with you, so I'm going for it, just for keks. Again, I think Jesus probably did have sex with men before he repented himself of all sin. Again that's conjecture. And no I don't think that necessarily having sex with men was more sinful than any sex at all. Sex is a mystery, but it's definitely carnal. A curse of the flesh, which we're stuck in. The Bible intimates that before the Original Sin there was no sex at all. No shame in nakedness because, I think, there was no lust.

 

But I agree that as a man, Jesus would have had lust. And he would have overcome that lust. Theologians like to say that he was always celibate. But I just don't see anywhere in the Bible where he says that. But he did say that the path to God, for those who could do it, was celibacy. It wasn't for everyone, but for his most devoted disciples (and himself) it was the path.

Anonymous ID: 3f0e0b Aug. 4, 2020, 4:30 a.m. No.10177731   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7748 >>7772

>>10177719

>>10177724

 

Why? I'm enjoying this. And there's a very tiny chance a real human out there will get to see a post that makes them think about something new. I always like when I read something that makes me question everything.

 

Praise God. Who I love with all my heart.

 

And yes meditating is a good idea.

Anonymous ID: 3f0e0b Aug. 4, 2020, 4:35 a.m. No.10177752   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7757 >>7764

>>10177733

Why do you think all the satanic shills post naked chick pics all the time?

 

Because they're filling the bread with carnal lust. Porn is a very powerful way to turn a man into a lusting, flesh-enslaved puppet of satan. I've watched lots of porn, so I never thought I would say that, but I'm pretty sure it's true. So I don't look at it anymore.

Anonymous ID: 3f0e0b Aug. 4, 2020, 4:41 a.m. No.10177775   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7807

>>10177758

Thank you. I agree. Sex is clearly a very important mystery to the pursuit of enlightenment. And it's used for very destructive purposes by the satanic cabal. I mean Epstein Island was all about sex and satan. So I've had to give this a lot of thought. And I'm not 100% clear on any of it. But I don't think it's a slide. I think it's a really hard question for a lot of people. It was for me, as someone who wants to do the right thing.

Anonymous ID: 3f0e0b Aug. 4, 2020, 4:44 a.m. No.10177796   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7809 >>7822

>>10177785

 

Good, I'd be happy to see you leave the bread. Anyhow, when shills start to try to pour water on a discussion (call it a dig, even) then I'm more inclined to push further. Because if I'm aggravating the shills then I know it's an important topic.