>You “deny “ Jesus by fornicating
Having sexual relations with a beloved soul of opposite sex is something Jesus did on Earth and does today as well, as everyone here should too.
>I don't think there's any real sauce for Jesus having sex with women
The real sauce for having sex with women is in my pants right now and I can be near 100% sure that it was present with Jesus as well. Logical thinking does the rest.
The Bible, for what we know, has not been written by Jesus, nor by any reputable historical source. Earliest Bible found already allowed for hundreds of re-writes to happen through the ages. Preaching how something as normal and beautiful as sex has to be shunned is a great way to enslave people more and make them dependent on that one source. No sex for you, but read more Bible. If I was a Cabalist manipulator, that's the first thing I'd write out.
>as a man, Jesus would have had lust. And he would have overcome that lust.
His soul was advanced enough not to be bothered by petty demonic theft of the gift of sex.
Sex is one of the few things that are in fact sacred. It's not a sin, it's not lustful - until you pervert its holiness, and it's 100% not a curse. It gives life.
Satanic inversions sadly exist in the Bible as well.
Always a good idea. I'm still feeling good from my last quality time with the Existence.
Slide from what?
>Put on the full armor of God so that you can take your stand against the devil's schemes. For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms.
This has been posted by Q 10 (ten) times. It is VERY important to find God and remove all lies placed by the Cabal in every facet of our existence.
Would you like to see your partner, mother, daughter's body form posted here?
The reasoning how it wasn't posted today, how it's about an "obvious" shill, how cleaning up Satanic filth is "anti-christian" and equates to burning the west also gave it away.
Here's you not taking your own advice and arguing how someone from your perspective hasn't contributed in a way you see fit, which also includes filtering - something even Q warned against .
>We came here for a reason.
>Freedom of information.
>No filters.
The real question is always - why are you so mad that people are talking about this?
I'm sure there's different degrees of "in the know".
"I know the tripcode" should be <10
"I can see how big this is" should be a bit more.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classified_information
How many people hold the Cosmic Top Secret clearance?
>a member of the Q team runs out of food
>picks up phone
>"<local fast food chain> here, can I take your order please?"
>-"No outside comms."
>-"I'm sorry sir?"
>-"No outside comms past, present or future."
>click