>>10186051 (pb)
Underrated post.
I'd suggest that you consider whether this is the best you can achieve as a man, and whether this is a desire that while superficially pleasurable might nonetheless lead you into a life of degradation.
Serious question…
I'm seeing many chemical/physical speculations regarding what might have caused the Beirut blast.
But has anyone constructed a coherent narrative regarding how this might be something other than corrupt and/or evil morons disregarding public safety who got caught by reality? Is there an actual narrative that could explain why this might have been sparked intentionally?
Fail.
Literally NO ONE thinks 9/11 was simply due to prior negligence, no matter how culpable the perps.
The only question there is who the underlying perps were.
By contrast, in Beirut, there is a reasonable story (or more than one) regarding how GROSS NEGLIGENCE could have led to the given outcome.
You seem to be suggesting that OUR TEAM set off this huge blast in a major city, despite the fact that it certainly killed many innocents.
Innocents die in war, for sure, but this DOES NOT fit with the way this particular "unconventional war" has played out. If "our side" did not give a shit about innocent lives, there would have been many more arrests by now.
I can totally believe that Hezbollah would store this shit for evil purpose in the middle of Beirut, possible consequences be damned.
And I can totally believe that Israel would blow it up, consequences be damned.
But why would Israel do that right now?
They haven't struck at an actual nation-state in a long time.
Actually, not necessarily disagreeing with you, since you don't claim that Israel did it.
I'm actually finding it fairly plausible that Hezbollah is just a bunch of evil fucktards and reality caught up with them.