Hey anons.
I've thought this through a lot and i've come to the conclusion that the filter option is fundementally destructive to our goals of free speech and inclusion.
Therefore i think we should submit to a vote whether going forward we should get the filter option disabled board wide.
WWG1WGA
o7
I'm collecting "filtered" yous.
Kek
<Shekels in my pocket
>>10188296 (me)
→ Add one: >>10188301
Obvious trolling is obvious.
<Seriously, i try lacing my shit posts with obvious buzz words. And most you faggots still believe it to be sincere…
<Remember when I made half the board believe I was a pro-Trump witch of Minerva wanting to cast a spell on the cabal? Good times…
Thanks for the lengthy reply though.
>>10188296 (me)
→ Added: >>10188345
>>10188296 (me)
→ Easiest addition to my list so far: >>10188367
>trolling to feed the ego
If that is what you think my reasoning is then I would agree.
However to feed my ego
I'd need to be recognizable.
I'm just an anon. Anon has no ego.
See if you could figure out what benefit I might actually see in posting these kinds of shitposts? Expand your thinking anon.
>you wouldve refuted me in your first reply
I refuted you in my first reply. And I'll do it again.
My trolling has nothing to do with my ego.
The You list is to make a point. Even if no one gets it, yet.
I was going to add you to the list but that would be cheating, you didn't write
"filtered" like a good little drone.
You should have read the bread before wasting your time on such a lengthy reply.
While I do not agree, personally i'm 4+ years along with no filters deployed even once. But I can see where you're coming from.
I was only suggesting it in jest because I know it triggers some here.
o7
>abcu