>Apples & oranges
Exactly.
Bet rt had common core or crayola science classes
>So show me the evidence then
Evidence of what?
Science?
Water vapor in the air is condensed by the pressure of the explosion.
[You] see pic related
Hi brit anon
>No show me a pic of a daisy cutter forming the same pattern of vaporizing. It should be easy right?
Not likely to be similar no, but also you wouldn't see the white cloud unless there is enough humidity, in which case ANY explosive with sufficient force will cause it to occur.
>So there's probably like another photo where it's similar right? Since any explosive could do that?
Provided that;
A: Someone took a photo under the right conditions and posted it
B: anyone cared enough to search when it was ground based explosion, not an air strike
>But nothing on the internet that can be found that matches right?
Can't say that with certainty because not going to waste time looking for unnecessary things
>You don't care if a nuke was dropped?
It wasn't a fucking nuke.
Every electronic in the area would be off (even if only 1/2 mile.
>>10218161 (pb) The Effects of Nuclear Weapons - Craters
>>10218366 (pb) EMP History
>VIDEO CAMERAS
What years was that?
Ever taken a really old camera apart?
Was it mechanical or digital?
pic related discussion with an army veteran
(people trained in this)
Just know the milfags are either keking at you or sad
>10220129
>b728d9
You should feel proud you entertained a disabled veteran for a bit tonight.
Laughing at how stupid you are.
No more shekels Schmo
Read those papers they would disagree with your assessment, but regardless it was conventional explosive signature.