no need for panic. we've known this since NOVEMBER 2.

carry on.

>Nov 2 2017 18:07:54 (EST) Anonymous ID: WBXFv1gI 147680054

>Please refer back and collect my crumbs.

<As discussed, we've anticipated the Twitter and other social media blackouts.

<Rogue agents/programmers.

<Per sealed Federal orders, we quickly tracked and reinstated.

<Expect outages periodically (infiltrated).

>If this doesn't signal what I've been saying I don't know what will.

>Q

>>1025304

>I can’t figure out how

you figured out how to post, so technically you could.

but if you didn't yet, maybe it's better you don't.

for those that can:

New Bakers Please Go To Cooking Class >>>/comms/154

Bakers Manual also available at >>1010064

or read

pastebin.com/aY5LyDPY

dough 1278

https:// pastebin.com/gW8bnniq

hey witchhunteranon, you around?

they're back on a Roseanne slide now, so i won't feel to guilty to repost:

so, was Rosemary's Baby mostly a documentary, as i've long suspected?

(all of them witches…)

Were the Tate murders pushback from the cult against Polanski for exposing them?

Or a sacrifice and Roman was just going along?

Weird how he was "exposed" and long stood out as a scapegoat for fuckery in Hollywood, yet stills runs free and is celebrated by celebrities, can't tell where he stands/comes from, if he was with them but went too public and got them mad, or it was all part of their PR/social control ops…

>>1025406

well then, seems we need to toughen you newfags up.

you're still waaaay too mushy to be the calm before and during the storm.

grow thicker skin.

some discernment.

and you could at least learn what the fuck baking is, you don't have to do it yourself.

>>1025469

weak and unnecessary, but still better.

>>1025503

thanks (can't watch video now but will look later), very interesting read on it, makes sense.

Wasn't the Manson family's Brows Aquino's pet project? I also highly doubt they were expected to do the job alone/anything other than a front/patsies

>>1025715

i guess @kill_rogue's t-shirt sales weren't going well

>>1025821

look, "alternate" info sauces are ok if you just post it and move on. That's appreciated, we get to see the chatter, you get to post your things.

But like Dilley, you can't help but mix it up with Q and want us all to join in your fun: no thanks.

This is the nice version, keep it to a minimum please.

>>1025823

>>1025882

now do you see why?

you will never not get a reaction like that.

The Dilleys found a solution: they made their own thread. Post aaaaaaaaaaalll the twatter info you want there. If anything solid comes up, come back here. Simple.