>>10259967 (pb)
>I don't think they intend to win the election.
Agree, but screwed up reply here by citing wrong amendment:
>>10260678 (pb)
Cited 25th, but that seems NOT relevant. Read carefully.
The 25th seems ONLY to reply upon REMOVAL of an EXISTING President and NOT to the case where no President has been properly "elected" by Congress.
It seems that the 20th is still in force there, and it seems Congress can basically do ANYTHING to install an ACTING President. Forget about the House voting by states and all that... suppose they DON'T. Then there is need for an ACTING President.
I think Biden/Harris is INTENTIONALLY being set up to "lose" (or actually not win) and to seem too EXTREME, so that when the DS lawfare strikes some Deep State stooge can be brought on the scene and attack the extremes on "both sides" .... Trump AND Antifa.
Think about it.
If I were a DS kingpin, that's probably what I'd shoot for. I sure wouldn't put my life in the hands of Pedo Joe and Cameltoe...