>>10261687

You can always see the general direction they will likely take by the way they get ahead of the information curve and they do this by using "fact" checking sites such as Snopes. Just yesterday Snopes put out a fact check that you can be jailed if you do not take the WuhanVirus vaccine, not even kidding:

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/states-fine-prison-covid-vaccine/

"It’s clear that the doctrine of state police power, as set out in the Jacobson case and subsequent federal court decisions, means individual states could, in principle, introduce a constitutionally sound mandatory COVID-19 vaccination program, and states could impose criminal penalties for those who, without a recognized exemption, refused to be vaccinated. Fox’s central claim, and KGTV’s reporting of it, were therefore accurate."

>>10262116

I am glad someone brought this up because I noticed that looked odd yesterday but at that point I was too tired/needed sleep and didn't look into it further.

>>10262190

I can't speak for other anons but after that post was made and for months after, many months, I checked to see if any staff from that hospital had died or made some post about being fired and couldn't find any. That doesn't prove anything of course but I would think that leaking such a huge thing would be immediate destruction of that person. Unfortunately they never added anything else and all that we have is that vague post so we will never know the truth of it.

One thing we do know for 100% is that the clock is running out if something is going to happen. The original plan for POTUS had to be to get rid of these internal troublemakers before his first term ended I would think because they would never want to risk an election where they know how the Dems have routinely cheated. So unless something happens very soon I am deeply concerned about how this plays out.

>>10262202

No idea, very odd though. You should archive it first then and then send it since archive has always worked. But you also should stop using those email sites and use a more secure line

>>10262208

>>10262237

That is a very good point, well stated anon.

>>10262195

She needs to be kept safe. You know they will be sending someone after her since she is a serious threat, a massive one.