Anonymous ID: 81b314 Aug. 13, 2020, 10:20 a.m. No.10274957   🗄️.is 🔗kun

"we believe it is for the . . ."

that's a use of 'we' that is improper.

if you have a list of who believes that hoax, then provide real names, not a general 'we'.

some use of 'we' is OK, that one is not. (by my estimation).

 

wow they realy think they can run their scams here, don't they.

date fagging earlier, and now the 'oh the reset'

Anonymous ID: 81b314 Aug. 13, 2020, 10:22 a.m. No.10274976   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10274961

you'll solve it all by the end of the bread in shitposts . . .

wow, are you that far behind on your theology that all of this troubles you?

or are you just rambling on without really understanding that the meaning of it all is, and just grasping out at it with methods that are bent of causeing confusing and spurging doubt.

but it's just a futile effort.