You know I think we may be overlooking something with the passing of the POTUS' brother. To preface about the POTUS, people can say or claim whatever they want about the man but I doubt anyone would ever argue with the fact he has always shown great loyalty and love toward both his family and/or those he sees as loyal/honorable people. Especially his family of course as Trump has always been very loving and helpful to them, even his ex who he remains on good terms with.

But now his brother passes away and he plans to have a memorial at the WH. On its face that may not sound like a big deal but I tend to think it is something else and actually goes hand in hand with his "you won't see me for a long time" statement. We always thought he meant he would disappear, wouldn't give interviews, etc, but we were wrong and we now know he is giving interviews and doing all his work from… the White House. So him saying "you won't see me for awhile" seems to clearly point to him staying in the secure confines of the WH during this time period.

So let's consider what would keep a man like Trump, a man who clearly and shown for many years his love for family, what would keep him from showing up to his brothers service outside the WH and at the same time still want to honor his brother at the WH? I see this as a security issue and there must be a very serious threat against him at this time to which the SS has suggested, and he agrees, that he needs to remain in the secure WH until the threat is handled.

If that is indeed true, and if that is indeed what is happening here then, and I really hate to say this as this is tin foil land which I really dislike to go down, but I have to wonder if the death of his brother was a means to try to draw him out of the WH security perimeter and into a position where he was venerable. Could be wrong here, likely am, but I just found the lack of him attending his brothers funeral outside the WH and instead having it there is very unlike Donald Trump and the only logical conclusion I have for it is security needs based on a serious threat that the SS identified.

>>10320410

I can't believe I am saying this but I somewhat agree with Stelter on the statement of "… which is USUALLY correct in categorizing the quality of its content". I mean he isn't wrong there as most of our breads are filled with utter bullshit due to the shills and thus many of the discussions are based on those stupid things.

So I can't fully disagree with him on that except I would adjust his statement to say "The quality of discussions by the QAnon can definitely be differentiated and categorized as either high level and excellent research, simple discussion on various topics, ridiculous theories born from ridiculous statements, completely fabricated baloney born from (typically) either shill, complete retarded, or otherwise subhuman intellect, full blown CNN level lies and propaganda, and/or carefully inserted bot controlled racist statements that occur on literally every single bread to make the board appear to be something it isn't."

I am actually kind of shocked that Stelter added the word "usually" as that means he does accept that some content here is very well done and researched. That is very odd for Brian as he normally just reads some script and does what his handler tells him.

>>10320510

Yeah absolutely it has been rather shocking to see the media try to claim that we who are simply researching and enjoying looking into these various topics are some horrible group. We are basically the same thing as any site that covers old and public material and then discusses it to try to figure out meanings, or cold cases, or historical questions, or just about anything. Granted I have no doubt there are people who come here who legitimately want to try to create a situation where violence occurs but for the most part that rarely happens here and when it does it is always met with a lot of real anons going after the person who states it.

It's interesting they constantly try to attach PizzaGate to this forum as that has really never been one of the primary discussions from the anons that I concluded were real. Of course it has been discussed but not even close to the amount it is discussed on half chan and the privchan. We usually just discuss already existing public data and cross reference it to try to see if anything is there worth looking into but we have never been a "OMG PIZZAGATE RAWWWR" board but simply have always identified, discussed, and either further researched or dismissed potential issues related to the PG stuff. You know I always find it odd how they have never brought up how the anons here are quite literally responsible for identifying, exposing, and ultimately making the report to arrest three people who were engaging in sexual deeds with children that they thought they could publicly discuss and get away with. It is because of us that those three were ultimately identified, exposed, and handled by the police so for the media to pretend like we are some cult who focuses on one issue or another merely because QAnon drops a crumb about it rather than being intelligent random people who can critically think, are very good at researching issues, and have personally been responsible for helping to save (at least) three kids is ridiculous. None of us think (I hope not at least) that we are some saviors of the universe and this is just an enjoyable situation where we can feel apart of helping to look into issues that were previously never dug into by the very same people who should be doing it.

So while I know that the media is a complete shitshow and everything is a script passed down to the boneheads like Stelter and the others I still have never truly understood how anyone, regardless of politics, could look at what is discussed and truly claim that the work isn't a good thing from the anons who simply want to help, aren't doing anything violent or harassing anyone, and have shown themselves to be far superior to any media connected research group. If I was in a position to hire people for various research related positions and if I knew who the anons were/could identify who was doing what I am damn sure I would find some stars on this forum given the work I have seen by some which far exceeds the norm.

>>10320653

It's obvious who wrote that given the words used, writing style, patterns, exact statements, timing, and in comparison with previous written statements. There are only three different anons who write in such am explanative way on this forum. One is me, the other is an anon I have a personal name for that consistently kicks out wonderful research and material on two very specific topics of research, and the third is this individual who we all know very well considering there was a recent video release with him being interviewed that I am fairly positive you all have watched.

>>10320746

Your post makes no sense. Rewrite it if you have questions as you clearly didn't read what I wrote if you think I am diminishing that research in any way.

>>10320755

"We". Yet another reason to mistrust that woman. What the hell did she do/could she do to have a persons children not taken away from them based on existing crimes that (if true) a person is accused of? She has no judicial power, no federal power, she has no power at all and yet she is now claiming that she had something to do with the release of someone being charged with four crimes based on a Grand Jury indictment?

Yet another reason to believe Tore is a fraud.

>>10320846

This has always been my concern as some random asshole could throw hundreds of small drones up there and hope to get one in an engine or something to cause a crash.

>>10320949

I understand what you are implying here so you don't need to play games to get your point across any further. But even if what you are saying is accurate it doesn't alter the fact pattern, OH law, previous statements, family track record history, and everything else suspicious surrounding this situation. At this current time there are simply too many questions and the answers are not well stated and appear to be a coordinated effort in some instances.

Frankly though, I honestly don't care about anything related to that group as I have long concluded that anyone/everyone even associated with IW was and is a fraud so I am not the person to convince as my opinion is already concluded based on a mountain of substantiated material. This issue is just another notch to mistrust them in my eyes.

Which is unfortunate by the way since the video presentation was actually well done despite not offering any actual hard evidence. I have no doubt it will attract and convince some of the lesser intellect types into exactly what it intended to do and I would absolutely have no problem admitting I was wrong if later I find out the whole thing was legitimately setup with good intentions but given who is involved, their track records, and recent events I just can't take it seriously