>>10334955

Sundance:

1) blogger rumored to have been pro-HRC, turned "alt-right"

2) no legal or investigative experience of which to speak

3) based on #2, difficult if not impossible to believe he has the ear of anyone at DOJ

4) of course, claims to have contacts within the Durham team

5) trashes Sarah Carter, Hannity, and many others within the Trump crowd

6) has locked horns with Mark Levin in the past

7) often makes predictions and then ignores them when they don't come true

8) trashes Q

9) obviously steals content from this board

10) claims inside info that will expose the Durham coverup and then physically travels and meets with media contacts to divulge. Huh? What? Why would you need to travel?

11) clearly gets upset when his bullshit gets called

This guy is a clown-shill larping as an insider.

"Be careful who you follow"

>>10335020

Troll? How many years has it been since an anon used the word "troll" on this board?

Try to blend in more.

>>10335084

I'll take a stab:

From reading THIS board, he's learned of the possibility that the small fish will be prosecuted by Durham, and the big fish will go to MIL tribunal for treason, but behind the scenes. So he's carved out a niche calling the Durham probe a "head fake" and pushing it as a coverup which pulls the heartstrings of normie concernfags who will cry that "nothin's happening." Now, he may be doing it b/c he genuinely thinks he can somehow force more disclosure, but I doubt it. He's a larping faggot trying to make himself the story no differently than Acosta at CNN.

>>10335209

>detractors are shills

or they're a group of battle-hardened anons that can spot famefagging paytriots a mile off.

it's simple, really.

when a blogger, tweeter, or youtuber starts making themselves the story, it's a red flag

we might be wrong since it's possible to help the "cause" and line your pockets at the same time

but those people are always going to alienate this board.

why? because disinfo shills ALWAYS start out as "over the target" and appear on the level BEFORE they start the disinfo.

anons know this, so it doesn't matter how right he is, he'll never be trusted 100%