If HCQ has a better success rate than 35%, then there's no way to argue that it shouldn't be available. This is setting the stage for a later reveal.
>How is this any better than HYDROXYCHLORINE & zinc & arith?
It isn't. But the machine won't complain about it because they can't. The process has been known for 100+ years.
Since HCQ works better, there will be no way to argue against HCQ since they will not argue against PLOZMA.