Anonymous ID: 42e3a0 Aug. 26, 2020, 6:20 a.m. No.10424804   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4815 >>4961

August 26, 2020

Don’t be fooled by the low Nielsen ratings for the RNC’s first night

By Andrea Widburg

The mainstream media and others on the left are happy to report that the television ratings reveal that the RNC’s audience on the first night of its convention was 29% lower than for the first night in 2016.However, this fails to account for something significant, which was that C-SPAN’s audience was almost 600% greater than the DNC’s C-SPAN numbers for the first night of its convention. Put another way, huge numbers of Americans wanted to watch the Republican convention. They just didn’t want to watch the media mediate it

 

Because numbers are involved here, let me make sure everybody is operating from the same set of facts:

 

In 2016, according to Nielsen, on the first night of the Democrat convention, 26 million people watched on television. Nielson’s numbers for the first night of the 2016 Republican convention held that 23 million people watched it on television.

 

Both of those were traditionally run conventions, with everyone gathered in a single venue, and lots of time out for cheering, during which the media talking heads could insert their commentary.

 

 

Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/08/dont_be_fooled_by_the_low_nielsen_ratings_for_the_rncs_first_night.html#ixzz6WEKmPkE6

Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Anonymous ID: 42e3a0 Aug. 26, 2020, 6:25 a.m. No.10424843   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4917

Trump or Obama: Who's the dumb one?

Peggy Noonan is showing that she doesn't care about facts any more than most of the media.

 

She says Obama's statement that Trump is lazy, greedy, and intellectually incapable is true, yet she gives no examples.

 

I saw nothing in Obama's policies and actions that indicated he was smart (intellectually capable), or that he worked hard, and I saw many actions by Obama and those surrounding him that showed he was greedy.

 

Obama was so lazy that he had to lie continuously to get Obamacare and the Iran deal through. He was so lazy that he couldn't get immigration reform passed, so he just dictatorially and unconstitutionally inflicted it on the public.

 

Obama was so dumb that he thought putting on massive mandates, reducing competition, and increasing taxes would lower health care costs.

 

He was so intellectually lacking that he gave us the slowest economic recovery in seventy years. He also had no idea that you could bring manufacturing jobs back to the U.S. He thought it would take magic.

 

He and Hillary were so lazy that they didn't lift a finger to save Americans under attack. Instead, they let them die while concocting a lie about a video because he was so obsessed with power.

 

In Trump's first term, he passed policies that yielded great results on economic growth and wage growth, especially for those at the bottom.

 

Trump reworked trade agreements, not Obama. Trump got criminal justice reform, not Obama. Trump got a peace agreement in the Mideast, not Obama. Obama allowed ISIS to gain power; Trump took them out. Trump gave us energy independence. Obama said you couldn't get there by drilling, another idiotic statement.

 

Trump gave defensive weapons to Ukraine. Obama appeased Putin.

 

Obama was so lazy that he wouldn't even enforce his own red line in Syria. Instead, he appeased Putin. Trump enforced Obama's red line.

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/08/trump_or_obama_whos_the_dumb_one.html

Anonymous ID: 42e3a0 Aug. 26, 2020, 6:30 a.m. No.10424884   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4995 >>5104

What is Gilead’s role in the war on Hydroxychloroquine?

 

Is Gilead, the maker of Remdesivir, waging war on HCQ (hydroxychloroquine)? Attacks on the drug have been continuous ever since Dr. Didier Raoult used this quinine derivative to save the lives of COVID-19 patients last March. The first attempt to discredit HCQ was a hastily compiled Veterans Administration hospital system study last April. Notably, one of the study’s authors had in the past received numerous grants from Gilead, with one grant in 2018 totaling nearly a quarter of a million dollars.

 

After deep flaws in the VA study were exposed, Surgisphere came to the rescue in May with a “15,000 patient” megastudy allegedly compiled from hospitals all over the world. This strategy succeeded: Following its publication in the Lancet and the NEJM, all outpatient use of HCQ was severely restricted in the U.S., Australia, and most of Europe.

 

When the Surgisphere scam was exposed, both articles were quietly retracted and the editor-in-chief of the Lancet tried to wash his hands of this embarrassing incident by denouncing Surgisphere’s “monumental fraud.” However only a few days earlier, Lancet editors played a major role in persuading WHO to suspend all trials for HCQ. Who put them up to it?

 

The study’s main author, Mandeep Mehra, also apologized for his reliance on a third party for the data. He may not have known the data was fabricated, but the hospital he directed was conducting two trials for Remdesivir. Was he under pressure from his sponsors?

 

These are the stakes: A five-day treatment with Remdesivir costs around $3,000. A five-day supply of generic HCQ costs around $10. Drug companies have every right to recoup their cost of research and development, but lobbying to suppress access to a lifesaving treatment that is both cheaper and more effective is a crime against humanity.

 

Progressives mistakenly believe that socialized medicine protects patients from the abuses of big pharma, but the first nation to severely restrict access to HCQ was France. This policy compelled Dr. Raoult to testify against Gilead’s disproportionate leverage over the medical community during a meeting of the French National Assembly last June.

 

Notably in the U.S., a third of the FDA’s budget comes from pharmaceutical user fees, and according to the NIH’s website, eight out of 55 members of the panel responsible for COVID-19 treatment guidelines are currently affiliated with Gilead. These government ties to Gilead more than triple when you include panel members with past associations.

 

Paradoxically, most opposition to HCQ in the U.S. comes from the left, but conservatives who know the ways of crony capitalism regard this as par for the course. After all, big pharma has given more to Democrats ever since the passage of Obamacare and up to now, Gilead employees donated three times more to the Biden campaign.

 

Sooner or later there will be a reckoning for everyone who colluded in this disinformation campaign.If you are among the policymakers or physicians participating in this charade, you may want to dissociate yourself while you can credibly plead ignorance for tens of thousands of preventable deaths

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/08/what_is_gileads_role_in_the_war_on_hydroxychloroquine.html